Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/538728

SuperCRUNCH: A toolkit for creating and manipulating supermatrices and other large phylogenetic datasets

Portik, D.·Wiens, J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

O_LIPhylogenies with extensive taxon sampling have become indispensable for many types of ecological and evolutionary studies. Many large-scale trees are based on a "supermatrix" approach, which involves amalgamating thousands of published sequences for a group. Constructing up-to-date supermatrices can be challenging, especially as new sequences may become available almost constantly. Additionally, genomic datasets (composed of thousands of loci) are becoming common in phylogenetics and phylogeography, and present novel challenges for constructing such datasets. C_LIO_LIHere we present SuperCRUNCH, a Python toolkit for assembling large phylogenetic datasets. It can be applied to GenBank sequences, unpublished sequences, or combinations of GenBank and unpublished data. SuperCRUNCH constructs local databases and uses them to conduct rapid searches for user-specified sets of taxa and loci. Sequences are parsed into putative loci and passed through rigorous filtering steps. A post-filtering step allows for selection of one sequence per taxon (i.e. species-level supermatrix) or retention of all sequences per taxon (i.e. population-level dataset). Importantly, SuperCRUNCH can generate "vouchered" population-level datasets, in which voucher information is used to generate multi-locus phylogeographic datasets. SuperCRUNCH offers many options for taxonomy resolution, similarity filtering, sequence selection, alignment, and file manipulation. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate the range of features available in SuperCRUNCH by generating a variety of phylogenetic datasets. Output datasets include traditional species-level supermatrices, large-scale phylogenomic matrices, and phylogeographic datasets. Finally, we briefly compare the ability of SuperCRUNCH to construct species-level supermatrices to alternative approaches. SuperCRUNCH generated a large-scale supermatrix (1,400 taxa and 66 loci) from 16GB of GenBank data in [~]1.5 hours, and generated population-level datasets (<350 samples, <10 loci) in <1 minute. It outperformed alternative methods for supermatrix construction in terms of taxa, loci, and sequences recovered. C_LIO_LISuperCRUNCH is a modular bioinformatics toolkit that can be used to assemble datasets for any taxonomic group and scale (kingdoms to individuals). It allows rapid construction of supermatrices, greatly simplifying the process of updating large phylogenies with new data. It is also designed to produce population-level datasets. SuperCRUNCH streamlines the major tasks required to process phylogenetic data, including filtering, alignment, trimming, and formatting. SuperCRUNCH is open-source, documented, and available at https://github.com/dportik/SuperCRUNCH. C_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

bioinformaticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Portik, D., Wiens, J.. 2019-02-02. SuperCRUNCH: A toolkit for creating and manipulating supermatrices and other large phylogenetic datasets. https://doi.org/10.1101/538728

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Deducing splicing events from transcript sets with splicelogic

Long-read RNA sequencing captures a greater proportion of full-length transcripts, enabling more accurate isoform identification, discovery of novel isoforms, and more precise differential transcript usage analysis. However, comparing transcripts, whether between conditions or between sets such as novel and annotated isoforms, yields complex isoform changes that are hard to manipulate, summarize, and visualize. This is compounded by vertical integration of some tools, where downstream analysis depends on the specific output of a particular upstream tool. To address this gap, we have developed splicelogic, an R/Bioconductor package that makes transcript-set comparisons biologically interpretable by turning them into discrete splicing events, such as exon skipping, alternative splice sites, intron retention, and alternative transcription start and end sites. We designed splicelogic to integrate easily with existing RNA-seq workflows and tools. The splicelogic functions are modular, readable, and extensible, making it easy for users to adapt core logic to their own custom scientific questions or novel splicing definitions. By obtaining interpretable splicing events from transcript changes, splicelogic enables downstream analyses, including annotation of RNA-binding protein recognition sites, alongside summary statistics and visualization. The splicelogic package is publicly available and distributed through Bioconductor.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Contrastive Learning Improves Generalization on M2OR Olfactory Binding Dataset

Olfaction-based biosensors stand to have profound impacts in fields such as medical diagnostics, national security, and drug discovery. A promising mode of vapor phase biodetection mimics volatile organic compound-olfactory receptor (VOC-OR) interactions with target-specific protein or peptide probes; however, lack of experimental coverage remains a core bottleneck. Current computational approaches aim to improve prediction of VOC-OR binding to reduce experimental burden, and current machine learning approaches fail to demonstrate a level of generalization that addresses current engineering challenges. Here, using the Molecular to Olfactory Dataset (M2OR) and Insect Olfactory Binding Protein Database (iOBPdb) datasets, data partitioning methods and their performance are evaluated on a neural network and contrastive learning framework on such VOC-OR binding datasets, varying: model training, architecture, and structure of the input data distribution. It was found that holding out certain chemical or proteomic motifs from the training data diminished model performance with a two layer neural network model. The model was able to generalize to state of the art performance (0.88 AUCROC) on every data split by applying a contrastive learning objective defined by shared molecular constituents and a stochastic sampler. This suggests the contrastive objective provides a strong inductive bias for neural networks to predict novel VOC-OR pairs. These findings highlight that model performance on pairwise biological interaction datasets can be inflated through identity leakage from constituent overlap, and emphasize the need for more robust evaluation protocols. Furthermore, we show contrastive regularization mitigates dataset degeneracy through enforcement of compatibility in the models latent geometry that may extend to other binder target-datasets where identity leakage confounds evaluation.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Plate design confounds donor variation and model evaluation in single-cell perturbation screens

Single-cell screens of immune cells from many donors are used to study why individuals respond differently and to benchmark response models. Each donor-perturbation combination typically occupies one well, controls are grouped, and donors share one layout, so technical effects can look biological. Using a 90-cytokine screen, two compound screens, four cohorts and simulations, we show that well effects explain most replicate-control variation in abundant cell types, controls carry a shared offset, and identical control wells differ by hundreds of differentially expressed genes at a standard threshold, about as many as two receptor-negative proteins do. Negative controls, design-aware estimators and perturbation-specific evaluation change the interpretation of four recent analyses. A deep-learning model that scores below a perturbation-agnostic predictor under standard evaluation outperforms a simple baseline on perturbation-specific differences in two of three cell types (significantly in one with stricter controls), but predicts less well the component shared with inert wells.

bioinformatics↗