Comprehensive analysis of RNA-seq kits for standard, low and ultra-low quantity samples

Palomares, M.-A.; Dalmasso, C.; Bonnet, E.; Derbois, C.; Brohard-Julien, S.; Ambroise, C.; Battail, C.; Deleuze, J.-F.; Olaso, R.

doi:10.1101/524439

bioRxiv · 10.1101/524439

Comprehensive analysis of RNA-seq kits for standard, low and ultra-low quantity samples

Palomares, M.-A.·Dalmasso, C.·Bonnet, E.·Derbois, C.·Brohard-Julien, S.·Ambroise, C.·Battail, C.·Deleuze, J.-F.·Olaso, R.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

High-throughput RNA-sequencing has become the gold standard method for whole-transcriptome gene expression analysis, and is widely used in numerous applications to study cell and tissue transcriptomes. It is also being increasingly used in a number of clinical applications, including expression profiling for diagnostics and alternative transcript detection. However, despite its many advantages, RNA sequencing can be challenging in some situations, for instance in cases of low input amounts or degraded RNA samples. Several protocols have been proposed to overcome these challenges, and many are available as commercial kits. In this study, we comprehensively test three recent commercial technologies for RNA-seq library preparation (TruSeq, SMARTer and SMARTer Ultra-Low) on human reference tissue preparations, using standard (1g), low (100 and 10 ng) and ultra-low (< 1 ng) input amounts, and for mRNA and total RNA, stranded or unstranded. The results are analyzed using read quality and alignment metrics, gene detection and differential gene expression metrics. Overall, we show that the TruSeq kit performs well with an input amount of 100 ng, while the SMARTer kit shows degraded performance for inputs of 100 and 10 ng, and the SMARTer Ultra-Low kit performs relatively well for input amounts < 1 ng. All the results are discussed in detail, and we provide guidelines for biologists for the selection of a RNA-seq library preparation kit.

Explore related subjects

genomics Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Palomares, M.-A., Dalmasso, C., Bonnet, E., Derbois, C., Brohard-Julien, S., Ambroise, C., Battail, C., Deleuze, J.-F., Olaso, R.. 2019-01-18. Comprehensive analysis of RNA-seq kits for standard, low and ultra-low quantity samples. https://doi.org/10.1101/524439

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Long-read DNA sequencing reveals global hypomethylation and focal hypermethylation in SDHx-deficient pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL) are highly heritable neuroendocrine tumors of the autonomic ganglia. Genomic DNA in most cancer cells is hypomethylated. However, DNA in PPGLs secondary to mutations in succinate dehydrogenase complex (SDHx) genes is reportedly hypermethylated due to succinate-mediated inhibition of DNA demethylases. We used nanopore long-read sequencing to characterize the methylome of tumor and white blood cell DNA from SDHx and non-SDHx PPGL patients, alongside normal adrenal medulla. We find that both SDHx and non-SDHx PPGLs are globally hypomethylated, particularly at centromeres. In normal adrenal medulla, CpG islands marked by H3K4 methylation are hypomethylated, whereas CpG islands lacking H3K4 methylation are hypermethylated. In SDHx-related PPGL, some H3K4me-marked CpG islands are hypermethylated, but most are not. We propose that DNA methylation in SDHx-related PPGL reflects the global hypomethylation generally observed in tumors, partly offset by succinate-mediated inhibition of TET DNA demethylases. Opposing effects of succinate may alter the balance between DNA methylation (indirect inhibition of the DNMT3A/B DNA methylases via inhibition of H3K4me demethylases) and DNA demethylation (inhibition of TET DNA demethylases) at active CpG islands.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2026

High piRNA abundance is a hallmark of evolutionarily persistent piRNA-producing loci.

PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) silence transposons in the germline, and the loci that produce them diverge rapidly between species. Yet, some loci retain both their genomic location and their piRNA production across large evolutionary distances, and the basis for this conservation is unclear. To identify the features that distinguish these persistent loci, we compared piRNA production at orthologous loci in three closely related mouse species, contrasting loci that produce piRNAs in all three species with those that do so in only one. Transposon content and UTR features, often linked to piRNA production, did not distinguish the two groups. Transcription extending beyond gene ends (readthrough) was more frequent at conserved loci, but did not explain conservation once the amount of piRNAs produced was taken into account. Instead, we found that the conserved loci are those that produce the most piRNAs. The same association holds true in human and two other primate species. We speculate that most piRNAs expressed in testis are tolerated molecular noise, and that only the highly expressed minority are likely to be functional.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2026

Epigenome-informed Polymer Modeling Reveals Chromosome Folding Landscapes across Distinct Genetic and Epigenetic Contexts

Three-dimensional (3D) genome organization is critical for gene regulation, enabling long-range interactions between genes and distal regulatory elements. Genomic structural variations and epigenetic differences can perturb this organization, contributing to phenotypic variation and tissue-specific gene regulation. Prior studies have assessed the impact of these genetic and epigenetic changes on 3D genome folding, primarily using population-averaged features such as topologically associating domains and loops. However, growing evidence from single-cell and live-imaging studies indicates that chromosomes are highly dynamic and exist as heterogeneous ensembles of conformations. Here, we applied an epigenetic-state-informed polymer modeling framework to generate chromosomal conformational ensembles directly from cell- and tissue-specific epigenomic data. The resulting ensembles reproduced experimental Hi-C maps across cell lines and tissue types. Comparison of these conformational ensembles revealed that, although polymer dynamics were conserved across cell lines, their folding landscapes diverged. These differences arose primarily from cell-line-specific chromatin-state interaction networks and were concentrated in rare, long-lived contacts. Furthermore, modeling a TAD-boundary-disrupting deletion without re-optimizing the model parameters indicated a shift in the chromatin conformational ensemble from predominantly insulated to predominantly fused states. The modeled deletion also selectively strengthened active chromatin contacts and differentially disrupted enhancer contacts involving neighboring genes. Finally, comparison of two tissue types from the same donor revealed epigenetically driven rewiring of chromatin-state interaction networks. These findings establish chromosomal conformational ensembles as a sensitive readout of genome reorganization across distinct genetic and epigenetic contexts.

genomics↗