Search bioRxivSearch

bioRxiv · 10.1101/514216

Perceptions and Prospects in Life Sciences in a Heterogenous Latin American Population

Abstract

Particular challenges exist for science education in the developing world, where limited resources beget curricula designed to balance state-of-the-art knowledge with practical and political considerations in region-specific contexts. Project-based biology teaching is particularly difficult to execute due to high infrastructural costs and limited teacher training. Here, we report our results implementing short, challenging, and low-cost biology courses to high school and college students in Bolivia, designed and taught in collaboration between scientists from developed nations and local science instructors. We find our approach to be effective at transmitting advanced topics in disease modeling, microscopy, genome engineering, neuroscience, microbiology, and regenerative biology. Importantly, this approach was unaffected by the students backgrounds, education level, socioeconomic status, or initial interest in the course, and increased participants interest in pursuing scientific careers. These results demonstrate efficacy of participatory learning in a developing nation, and suggest that such techniques could drive scientific engagement in other developing economies.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ferreira, L. M. R., Carosso, G. A., Lopez-Videla, B., Vaca Diez, G., Rivera-Betancourt, L. I., Rodriguez, Y., Ordonez, D. G., Montellano Duran, N., Alatriste-Gonzalez, D. K., Vacaflores, A., Bohorquez, S., Gonzalez Auza, L., Schuetz, C., Alexander-Savino, C., Gandarilla Cuellar, O., Mostajo Radji, M. A.. 2019-01-07. Perceptions and Prospects in Life Sciences in a Heterogenous Latin American Population. https://doi.org/10.1101/514216

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education

Assessing metadata and curation quality: a case study from the development of a third-party curation service at Springer Nature

Since 2017, the publisher Springer Nature has provided an optional Research Data Support service to help researchers deposit and curate data that support their peer-reviewed publications. This service builds on a Research Data Helpdesk, which since 2016 has provided support to authors and editors who need advice on the options available for sharing their research data. In this paper we describe a short project which aimed to facilitate an objective assessment of metadata quality, undertaken during the development of a third-party curation service for researchers (Research Data Support). We provide details on the single-blind user-testing which was undertaken, and the results gathered during this experiment. We also briefly describe the curation services which have been developed and introduced following an initial period of testing and piloting. This paper will be presented at the International Digital Curation Conference 2019, and has been submitted to the International Journal of Digital curation.

scientific communication and education

Postdoc X-ray in Europe 2017: work conditions, productivity, institutional support and career outlooks

1.Executive SummaryThis survey and data analysis were conducted by the European Network of Postdoctoral Associations (ENPA) with the aim of assessing the current research and work conditions, aspirations and support received by postdoctoral researchers working in Europe. The Results section is structured into three main parts. The first one describes the study sample of European postdoctoral researchers, including participants demographics, funding sources and income, research outputs, and teaching opportunities. The second section focuses on their professional aspirations and institutional support provided. The third part describes the level of engagement of postdoctoral researchers and their institutions in working towards better research conditions and career development, and what initiatives are emerging within this community. Our Conclusions section pulls together this comprehensive analysis, highlighting some of the most concerning issues currently affecting postdoctoral researchers in Europe. We also make a number of recommendations that would significantly improve the career expectations and aspirations of postdoctoral researchers. These are listed below. Conclusions and recommendationsO_LILonger postdoctoral periods in Southern Europe despite higher publication metrics Recommendation Institutions in Southern Europe should develop clear criteria to support postdoctoral researchers career progression. C_LIO_LISouthern and Eastern Europe pay the lowest salaries and have the lowest number of foreign postdoctoral researchers Recommendation The salary differences across European countries should be addressed as this could be a barrier to mobility and knowledge exchange from higher to lower pay regions. C_LIO_LILack of access to funding is a significant concern of postdoctoral researchers Recommendation Discrepancies in access to funding should be minimized across the different European areas. C_LIO_LIPostdoctoral researchers in Europe work longer hours than required by contract Recommendation The culture of overwork in the research environment should be addressed in order to protect researchers against the risks associated with long hours at work. C_LIO_LIThe majority of full-time postdoctoral work contracts includes an exclusivity clause Recommendation Inclusion of exclusivity clauses in contracts for postdoctoral researchers should be optional in order to allow them to enhance their employability outside academia. C_LIO_LIPostdoctoral researchers career development is poorly supported by their institutions Recommendation Postdoctoral researchers career prospects and career management should be much more supported by institutions in coordination with postdoctoral associations. C_LIO_LILack of postdoctoral representation in governance is linked to unclear institutional duties and rights Recommendation Institutional governance bodies should include postdoctoral researcher representatives. This would ensure that the views of this vital staff group are heard, as well as making postdoctoral researchers feel more engaged with their own institutions. A flexible and proactive communication strategy at the institution and research group level should be developed, taking into account the sometimes transient nature of postdoctoral researchers posts. C_LIO_LIResearchers show higher engagement with their local postdoctoral associations than with workers unions Recommendation Postdoctoral associations are an essential way to advocate for postdoctoral researchers at the governance level. Institutions should engage with, promote and support the work of postdoctoral associations. C_LI

scientific communication and education