What is known about modified insects for disease prevention?: a systematic review

Nazareth, T.; Craveiro, I.; Moutinho, A.; Goncalves, C.; Goncalves, L.; Teodosio, R.; Sousa, C. A.

doi:10.1101/494849

Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/494849

What is known about modified insects for disease prevention?: a systematic review

Nazareth, T.·Craveiro, I.·Moutinho, A.·Goncalves, C.·Goncalves, L.·Teodosio, R.·Sousa, C. A.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The modification and release of insects to suppress or replace natural insect vectors constitutes a promising tool for vector control and disease prevention, facing the unprecedented global emergence of vector-borne diseases. Little is known regarding these innovative modification strategies and available evidence is not standardized turning it difficult to reflect on their actual efficacy and eventual effects.\n\nThis work conducted a systematic review, gathering and analyzing research articles from PubMed and Biblioteca Virtual em Saude databases whose results directly report efficacy and effects of the use of modified insects for disease prevention until 2016. Within more than 1500 publications that were screened a total of 349 where analyzed.\n\nA total of 12/3.4% reported field-based evidence, and 41/11.7% covered modification stretagies efficacy after insects release, their epidemiology impact or its long-term efficacy. Examples of successful results were the replacement of natural field populations by wolbachia-infected mosquitoes in 5 weeks, and the elimination of a population in laboratory cages after transgenic mosquitoes release over 10-20 weeks. Variability in the effective results were described (90/25.7%) questioning its reproducibility in different settings. We also found 38/10.9% publications reporting reversal outcomes, such as an increase of vector population after release. Ecological effects such as horizontal transfer events to non-target species (54/15.5%), and wolbachia-induced worsening pathogenesis on mammal filarial diseases (10/2.9%) were also reported.\n\nPresent work revealed promising outcomes of both suppressing and replacing approaches. However, it also revealed a need of field-based evidence mainly regarding epidemiologic and long-term impact of insect modification strategies. It pointed out some eventual irreversible and important effects that must not be ignored when considering open-field releases, and that may constitute constraints to generate the missing field evidence. Moreover, the level of variability of existing evidence suggests the need of local/specific evidence in each setting of an eventual release.\n\nAuthor summaryInnovative strategies are needed to arrest the unprecedented increase of vector-borne disease incidence, distribution and severity. Several modification techniques are being tried all over the world. However this is still an emergent topic with scarce available information and of complex understanding.\n\nPresent work is the unique structured review regarding the use of modified insects for vector-borne disease prevention, bringing neutral and robust evidence that will contribute with critical insights regarding these approaches.\n\nHere we explored more than 1200 publications and analyzed 349 publications on this subject, describing the actual efficacy and reported effects of several modification strategies. More than 30 categories were reported such as, the type of modification, the year of the publication, the species were results were tested, the type of study, and also type of Efficacy Outcome (from modification to long-term) and/or the type of Effects Outcome (from physiologic to ecologic effects). Analysis revealed promising outcomes regarding vector-control and disease prevention. However insects modification strategies still lack field-based evidence mainly regarding epidemiological and long-term efficacy. Eventual reversal outcomes on disease transmission, or irreversible biological effects (including horizontal transfer to non-target species or worsening pathogenesis in particular diseases in mammals), were also described. These effects need to be explored, dispelled or resolved before field trials occur in human residential areas. Some of these questions could only have a robust answer if these strategies would be implemented, needing to take the risk to observe reversal outcomes and/or irreversible effects. These findings reflect the big dilemma that is under the use of modified insects to prevent vector-borne diseases. Findings could support health authorities in decision-making and regulatory committees during advisory processes, by evaluating the pros/cons of each modifying technique for a particular setting. Moreover they could also summarize what is crucial to inform to communities if planning open field releases in residential areas.

Explore related subjects

ecology Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Nazareth, T., Craveiro, I., Moutinho, A., Goncalves, C., Goncalves, L., Teodosio, R., Sousa, C. A.. 2018-12-12. What is known about modified insects for disease prevention?: a systematic review. https://doi.org/10.1101/494849

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Human-caused ignitions and plant invasion drive fire-regime change in a dryland biodiversity hotspot

Dryland ecosystems cover much of Earths terrestrial surface and are increasingly affected by climate warming, land-use change, and biological invasion. The Sonoran Desert of western North America, a biodiversity hotspot that historically experienced infrequent fire, exemplifies how these global-change processes are driving ecosystem transformation through the emergence of novel disturbance regimes. Using records of more than 73,000 wildland fire events, we quantified anthropogenic and environmental controls on fire ignition, size, and spread across the Sonoran Desert. Human-caused ignitions accounted for 95.5% of all recorded fires since the early 1990s and were concentrated near roads, buildings, and other areas of human activity, particularly during late spring. In contrast, lightning-caused ignitions were rare within the Sonoran Desert and occurred primarily in adjacent montane forests during late summer months. Consistent with broader trends across the western United States, fires were typically largest when they ignited far from roads, where access is limited, and fire management often relies on indirect attack strategies. Pre-fire annual and perennial herbaceous vegetation both promoted fire spread, with detectable effects at cover values as low as 5%, while bare ground reduced fuel connectivity and constrained fire growth. Rather than exhibiting a distinct threshold response, fire spread increased linearly with herbaceous cover, suggesting that even modest increases in fine fuels can alter fire behavior in this historically fuel-limited ecosystem. Together, our results illustrate that human ignitions determine where fires occur, whereas herbaceous fuels determine whether those ignitions spread, driving fire-regime transformation across an iconic North American desert. Managing and adapting to this novel fire regime will require coordinated efforts to reduce human-caused ignitions, limit invasive herbaceous fuels, maintain bare-ground interspaces, and rapidly suppress fires. More broadly, our findings identify the mechanisms controlling fire regime change in dryland ecosystems and provide a framework for anticipating ecosystem transformation under ongoing global change.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2026

Hidden infections: Linking parasite ecology, fish health and stakeholder perceptions in Nile tilapia aquaculture in central Kenya

Parasite infections in farmed fish may remain unrecognised when fish-health assessment relies mainly on visible signs. We investigated metazoan parasite occurrence, parasite diversity and community composition, associations between gill-parasite burden and histological alterations, and stakeholder recognition of fish-health problems in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) aquaculture in central Kenya. We examined 157 fish from 20 farms, assessed gill histology in 137 fish, measured water quality once per farm, and collected questionnaire and interview data from 48 stakeholders. Five metazoan parasite groups were recorded, with monopisthocotylans the most prevalent (36.3%). Higher monopisthocotylan burden was associated with a greater cumulative number of gill lesion types (odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.43-2.42, p < 0.001), whereas copepod burden was not. Parasite diversity was higher in the larger operational pond category across all three Hill-number orders (p = 0.006-0.008), and parasite-community composition differed between categories (PERMANOVA, p = 0.034), although these comparisons were exploratory because only four farms were in the larger category and farm category overlapped with county. Single-time-point water-quality measurements showed no clear associations with parasite burden, diversity or community composition after multiple-testing correction. Farmers and fisheries or extension officers recognised signs of poor fish health but rarely identified parasites as a specific cause, and routine diagnostic confirmation was uncommon. The findings reveal a gap between laboratory detection of parasite-associated gill alterations and farm-level recognition and diagnosis.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2026

Habitat degradation destabilizes complex metacommunities by disrupting dispersal

Habitat loss and fragmentation are rapidly reshaping ecosystems worldwide, yet their consequences for ecological stability remain unresolved. Classical theory, pioneered by Robert May, established rigorous criteria for stability; however, these apply to spatially well-mixed communities, limiting their relevance to habitat degradation. Here, we develop a metacommunity framework that integrates classical stability theory with spatial dynamics to determine how anthropogenic habitat degradation reshapes ecosystem stability. We show that metacommunities exhibit three distinct dynamical regimes following a perturbation (e.g., drought or forest fire): stable regime (perturbations decay and species persist), reactive regime (perturbations are transiently amplified, which increases extinction risk under repeated disturbances), and unstable regime (perturbations grow, causing extinctions even after a single disturbance). Dispersal fundamentally reshapes these stability transitions, converting unstable communities into reactive ones and reactive communities into stable ones. While homogeneous dispersal progressively stabilizes communities, heterogeneous dispersal maximizes stability at intermediate strengths. We further show that habitat loss and fragmentation can be comparably effective at driving species extinctions by shifting metacommunities from stable to reactive and ultimately unstable regimes, demonstrating that fragmentation per se can be as important as habitat loss. Our findings reveal that reactivity is both an early-warning signal of impending instability and a state of elevated extinction risk under recurrent disturbances. By linking stability transitions to changes in population persistence under nonlinear dynamics, our results bridge classical stability theory with spatial ecology and provide a general framework for predicting how ecological complexity and dispersal jointly govern both ecosystem stability and population persistence under habitat degradation.

ecology↗