Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/488734

Poly-Enrich: Count-based Methods for Gene Set Enrichment Testing with Genomic Regions and Updates to ChIP-Enrich

Abstract

Gene set enrichment (GSE) testing enhances the biological interpretation of ChIP-seq data and other large sets of genomic regions. Our group has previously introduced two GSE methods for genomic regions: ChIP-Enrich for narrow regions and Broad-Enrich for broad genomic regions, such as histone modifications. Here, we introduce new methods and extensions that more appropriately analyze sets of genomic regions with vastly different properties. First, we introduce Poly-Enrich, which models the number of peaks assigned to a gene using a generalized additive model with a negative binomial family to determine gene set enrichment, while adjusting for gene locus length (#bps associated with each gene). This is the first method that controls for locus length while accounting for the number of peaks per gene and variability among genes. We also introduce a flexible weighting approach to incorporate region scores, a hybrid enrichment approach, and support for new gene set databases and reference genomes/species. As opposed to ChIP-Enrich, Poly-Enrich works well even when nearly all genes have a peak. To illustrate this, we used Poly-Enrich to characterize the pathways and types of genic regions (introns, promoters, etc) enriched with different families of repetitive elements. By comparing ChIP-Enrich and Poly-Enrich results from ENCODE ChIP-seq data, we found that the optimal test depends more on the pathway being regulated than on the transcription factor or other properties of the dataset. Using known transcription factor functions, we discovered clusters of related biological processes consistently better modeled with either the binary score method (ChIP-Enrich) or count based method (Poly-Enrich). This suggests that the regulation of certain processes is more often modified by multiple binding events (count-based), while others tend to require only one (binary). Our new hybrid method handles this by automatically choosing the optimal method, with correct FDR-adjustment. Author SummaryAlthough every cell in our body contains the same DNA, our cells perform vastly different functions due to differences in how our genes are regulated. Certain regions of the genome are bound by DNA binding proteins (transcription factors), which regulate the expression of nearby genes. After an experiment to identify a large set of these regions, we can then model the association of these regions with various cellular pathways and biological processes. This analysis helps understand the overall biological effect that the binding events have on the cells. For example, if genes relating to apoptosis tend to have the transcription factor, Bcl-2, bind more often nearby, then Bcl-2 is likely to have a vital role in regulating apoptosis. The specifics of how to best perform this analysis is still being researched and depends on properties of the set of genomic regions. Here, we introduce a new, more flexible method that counts the number of occurrences per gene and models that in a sophisticated statistical test, and compare it to a previous method. We show that the optimal method depends on multiple factors, and the new method, Poly-Enrich, allows interesting findings in scenarios where the previous method failed.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lee, C. T., Cavalcante, R. G., Lee, C., Qin, T., Patil, S., Wang, S., Tsai, Z. T., Boyle, A. P., Sartor, M. A.. 2018-12-06. Poly-Enrich: Count-based Methods for Gene Set Enrichment Testing with Genomic Regions and Updates to ChIP-Enrich. https://doi.org/10.1101/488734

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Contrastive Learning Improves Generalization on M2OR Olfactory Binding Dataset

Olfaction-based biosensors stand to have profound impacts in fields such as medical diagnostics, national security, and drug discovery. A promising mode of vapor phase biodetection mimics volatile organic compound-olfactory receptor (VOC-OR) interactions with target-specific protein or peptide probes; however, lack of experimental coverage remains a core bottleneck. Current computational approaches aim to improve prediction of VOC-OR binding to reduce experimental burden, and current machine learning approaches fail to demonstrate a level of generalization that addresses current engineering challenges. Here, using the Molecular to Olfactory Dataset (M2OR) and Insect Olfactory Binding Protein Database (iOBPdb) datasets, data partitioning methods and their performance are evaluated on a neural network and contrastive learning framework on such VOC-OR binding datasets, varying: model training, architecture, and structure of the input data distribution. It was found that holding out certain chemical or proteomic motifs from the training data diminished model performance with a two layer neural network model. The model was able to generalize to state of the art performance (0.88 AUCROC) on every data split by applying a contrastive learning objective defined by shared molecular constituents and a stochastic sampler. This suggests the contrastive objective provides a strong inductive bias for neural networks to predict novel VOC-OR pairs. These findings highlight that model performance on pairwise biological interaction datasets can be inflated through identity leakage from constituent overlap, and emphasize the need for more robust evaluation protocols. Furthermore, we show contrastive regularization mitigates dataset degeneracy through enforcement of compatibility in the models latent geometry that may extend to other binder target-datasets where identity leakage confounds evaluation.

bioinformatics↗

Plate design confounds donor variation and model evaluation in single-cell perturbation screens

Single-cell screens of immune cells from many donors are used to study why individuals respond differently and to benchmark response models. Each donor-perturbation combination typically occupies one well, controls are grouped, and donors share one layout, so technical effects can look biological. Using a 90-cytokine screen, two compound screens, four cohorts and simulations, we show that well effects explain most replicate-control variation in abundant cell types, controls carry a shared offset, and identical control wells differ by hundreds of differentially expressed genes at a standard threshold, about as many as two receptor-negative proteins do. Negative controls, design-aware estimators and perturbation-specific evaluation change the interpretation of four recent analyses. A deep-learning model that scores below a perturbation-agnostic predictor under standard evaluation outperforms a simple baseline on perturbation-specific differences in two of three cell types (significantly in one with stricter controls), but predicts less well the component shared with inert wells.

bioinformatics↗

LinearRaccess: linear-time approximation of RNA accessibility without base-pair span limits

Motivation: RNA accessibility is the probability that every nucleotide in a contiguous interval is simultaneously unpaired; it is widely used to predict binding sites for RNA-binding proteins and other RNA-RNA interactions, often in the form of the opening energy, an equivalent measure on a logarithmic scale. Existing tools restrict the maximum base-pair span, discarding long-range base pairs that matter biologically. Others sample structures, introducing statistical variance, or compute accessibility exactly without a span limit, at cubic time cost. No existing method computes the accessibility of windows longer than one nucleotide deterministically in linear time while preserving long-range base pairs. We present LinearRaccess, which computes accessibility directly in linear time via beam-pruned inside-outside dynamic programming with a difference-array aggregation step, without restricting base-pair span. Results: For a sequence of length N and a fixed beam width b, LinearRaccess runs in O(N) time and O(Nb) memory. Against exact accessibility on 12,872 bpRNA-1m(90) sequences of 100-1,000 nt, its median opening-energy error is below 0.001 kcal/mol (0.14 kcal/mol for 700-1,000 nt), and it distinguishes windows of very small accessibility, including 35-nt windows, below the resolution of sampling-based estimates. LinearRaccess analyzes the full 29,903-nt SARS-CoV-2 genome in 419 seconds. Conclusion: LinearRaccess is the first method to compute the accessibility of windows longer than one nucleotide deterministically (without sampling) in linear time without restricting base-pair span. Availability: https://github.com/TakumiOtagaki/LinearRaccess, archived at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23598502).

bioinformatics↗