Search bioRxivSearch

bioRxiv · 10.1101/465013

A Double-Blind Pilot Dosing Study of Low Field Magnetic Stimulation (LFMS) for Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)

Abstract

Low Field Magnetic Stimulation is a potentially rapid-acting treatment for depression with mood-enhancing effects in as little as one 20-minute session. The most convincing data for LFMS has come from treating bipolar depression. We examined whether LFMS also has rapid mood-enhancing effects in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, and whether these effects are dose-dependent. We hypothesized that a single 20-min session of LFMS would reduce depressive symptom severity and that the magnitude of this change would be greater after three 20-min sessions than after a single 20-min session. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 30 participants (age 21-65) with treatment-resistant depression were randomized to three 20-minute active or sham LFMS treatments with 48 hours between treatments. Response was assessed immediately following LFMS treatment using the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-6), the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and the Visual Analog Scale. Following the third session of LFMS, the effect of LFMS on VAS and HAMD-6 was superior to sham (F(1, 24) = 7.45, p = 0.03, Holm-Bonferroni corrected; F(1,22) = 6.92, p = 0.03, Holm-Bonferroni corrected, respectively). There were no differences between sham and LFMS following the initial or second session with the effect not becoming significant until after the third session. Three 20-minute LFMS sessions were required for active LFMS to have a mood-enhancing effect for individuals with treatment-resistant depression. As this effect may be transient, future work should address dosing schedules of longer treatment course as well as biomarker-based targeting of LFMS to optimize patient selection and treatment outcomes.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dubin, M. J., Ilieva, I., Deng, Z.-D., Thomas, J., Cochran, A., Kravets, K., Brody, B. D., Christos, P. J., Kocsis, J. H., Liston, C., Gunning, F. M.. 2018-11-09. A Double-Blind Pilot Dosing Study of Low Field Magnetic Stimulation (LFMS) for Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). https://doi.org/10.1101/465013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Effects of daily L-dopa administration on learning and brain structure in older adults undergoing four weeks of cognitive training: a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BackgroundCognitive aging creates major individual and societal burden, motivating search for treatment and preventive care strategies. Behavioural interventions can improve cognitive performance in older age, but effects are small. Basic research has implicated dopaminergic signaling in plasticity. We investigated whether transient enhancement of dopaminergic neurotransmission via administration of L-dopa improves effects of cognitive training on performance. MethodsParticipants for this randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were recruited via newspaper advertisements. Inclusion criteria were: age of 65-75 years, Mini-Mental State Examination score >25, absence of serious medical conditions. Eligible subjects were randomly allocated to either receive 100/25mg L-dopa/benserazide or placebo prior to each of twenty cognitive training sessions administered during a four-week period. Participants and staff were masked to group assignment. Primary outcomes were latent variables of spatial and verbal fluid intelligence. This trial was preregistered at the European Clinical Trial Registry, EudraCT#2016-000891-54. FindingsBetween January 1st and October 10th 2017, we screened 235 people from the population in Stockholm, Sweden and randomly assigned 63 eligible subjects to receive L-dopa (n=32) or placebo (n=31) during cognitive training. Compared to the placebo group, subjects receiving L-dopa improved less in spatial intelligence (-0{middle dot}267 SDs; 95% CI [-0{middle dot}498, -0{middle dot}036]; p=0{middle dot}024). Change in verbal intelligence did not significantly differ between the groups (-0{middle dot}081 SDs, 95% CI [-0{middle dot}242, 0{middle dot}080]; p=0{middle dot}323). Adverse events occurred for 10 subjects (31%) in the active and for 7 participants (23%) in the control groups. InterpretationThe results speak against early pharmacological interventions in older healthy adults to improve cognitive functions by targeting the dopaminergic system and provide no support for learning-enhancing properties of L-dopa supplements. The findings warrant closer investigation about the cognitive effects of early dopamine-replacement therapy in neurological disorders. FundingEuropean Research Council (ERC Grant agreement #617280-REBOOT), Wallenberg Clinical Scholars, and Stiftelse Stockholms Sjukhem. RESEARCH IN CONTEXTO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWhilst pharmacological treatments have so far been largely unsuccessful in making an impact on age-related cognitive decline, recent findings have suggested small improvements of cognitive performance in older people by combining cognitive training with a healthy diet and aerobic exercises. Both exercise and dietary factors may exhibit plasticity-enhancing properties, and therefore increase effectiveness of cognitive training. In related basic research, dopaminergic signaling has been implicated in brain plasticity. An extensive PubMed search was conducted during the preparatory stage of the study (September 2014-July 2016) to investigate the role of dopamine signaling in neural plasticity and learning, as well as the effects of its deterioration on these characteristics in aging and neurodegenerative disorders. As a result, we found a substantial number of studies reporting acute improvements in cognitive performance and learning by administration of exogenous dopamine precursor L-dopa. A similar search was conducted specifically for this drug to evaluate its pharmacological and safety profile. We found a large body of basic research on both animal models and humans that supported the role of dopamine signaling in learning and plasticity. In addition, two smaller studies reported promising effects of repeated L-dopa administration on learning in the healthy younger population. In all studies, standard small-dose (100mg) L-dopa interventions were safe and well-tolerated. Added value of this studyOur study is the first of its kind to evaluate effects of repeated pro-dopaminergic medication on learning during cognitive training and cognitive performance in healthy older adults. Our results do not support the hypothesis of plasticity- and learning-promoting effects of enhanced dopaminergic neurotransmission by administration of exogenous dopamine precursor L-dopa in the healthy older population. The findings indicate that L-dopa treatment may in fact be detrimental to learning and cognitive performance and lead to structural brain changes within the dopaminergic circuit. Implications of all the available evidenceThe results put constraints on the hypothesis of a key role of the deteriorated dopaminergic system in age-related decline of learning abilities, and speak against early pharmacological interventions in older healthy adults to improve cognitive functions by targeting the dopaminergic system. Our findings also raise concerns about usefulness of novel L-dopa-containing supplements that claim to have neuroprotective and learning-enhancing properties, and present an urgent need to carefully investigate the cognitive outcomes of early pro-dopaminergic interventions in clinical populations often receiving substantially larger doses of L-dopa.

clinical trials

The effect of dietary intervention on inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes. An analysis of the Lifestyle Over and Above Drugs in Diabetes (LOADD) study

Ninety-three participants with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes despite optimized drug therapy were randomised to receive intensive dietary advice or usual care for six months. Following dietary intervention a significant reduction in interleukin-18 levels was observed, with a ratio of change (95% CI) of 0.90 (0.82-0.99); p = 0.033. Changes in IL-18 correlated with changes in neopterin, r = 0.299 (p = 0.009)

clinical trials

Brain volumes of very low birth weight infants measured by two dimensional cranial ultrasonography, a prospective cohort study

BackgroundCranial ultrasonography is the main neuroimaging technique for very low birth weight infants. Brain volume is a very important information about central nervous system of preterm babies.\n\nThis study aimed to evaluate brain volumes of preterm infants with two dimensional measurements of cranial ultrasonography.\n\nMethodsIntracranial height, anteroposterior diameter, bi-parietal diamater, ventricular height, thalamo-occipital distance and ventricular index measured with routine cranial ultrasonographic scanning. Brain considered a spheric, ellipsoid model and estimated absolute brain volume (EABV) calculated by substracting two lateral ventricular volumes from the total brain volume.\n\nResultsOne hundred and twenty one preterm infants under a birthweight of 1500 g and 32 weeks of gestational age included in this study. Mean gestational age of study population was 27,7 weeks, and mean birthweight was 1057 grams.\n\nTwenty two of 121 infants had dilated ventricle, in this group EABV was lower than normal group (202 {+/-} 58 cm3 vs 250 {+/-} 53 cm3, respectively, p<0.01). Advanced resuscitation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and late onset sepsis found to be independent risk factors for low brain volume in our data.\n\nConclusionsEstimated absolute brain volume could be calculated and estimated by two dimensional measurements with transfontanel ultrasonography.

clinical trials