Search bioRxivSearch

bioRxiv · 10.1101/447987

Reciprocal carbon subsidies between autotrophs and bacteria in stream food webs under stoichiometric constraints

Abstract

O_LISoils are currently leaching out their organic matter at an increasing pace and darkening aquatic ecosystems due to climate and land use change, or recovery from acidification. The implications for stream biogeochemistry and food webs remain largely unknown, notably the metabolic balance (biotic CO2 emissions), reciprocal subsidies between autotrophs and bacteria, and trophic transfer efficiencies.\nC_LIO_LIWe use a flow food web approach to test how a small addition of labile dissolved organic matter affects the strength and dynamics of the autotrophs-bacteria interaction in streams. Our paired streams whole-ecosystem experimental approach combined with continuous whole-stream metabolism and stable isotope probing allowed to unravel carbon fluxes in the control and treatment streams.\nC_LIO_LIWe increased the natural supply of dissolved organic matter for three weeks by only 12% by continuously adding 0.5 mg L-1 of sucrose with a {delta}13C signature different from the natural organic matter. Both photosynthesis and heterotrophic respiration increased rapidly following C addition, but this was short lived due to N and P stoichiometric constraints. The resulting peak in heterotrophic respiration was of similar magnitude to natural peaks in the control observed when soils were hydrologically connected to the streams and received soil derived carbon.\nC_LIO_LICarbon reciprocal subsidies between autotrophs and bacteria in the control stream accounted for about 50% of net primary production and 75% of bacterial production, under low flow conditions when stream water was hydrologically disconnected from soil water. The reciprocal subsidies were weaker by 33% (autotrophs to bacteria) and 55% (bacteria to autotrophs) in the treatment relative to the control. Net primary production relied partly (11% in the control) on natural allochthonous dissolved organic carbon via the CO2 produced by bacterial respiration.\nC_LIO_LIMany large changes in ecosystem processes were observed in response to the sucrose addition. The light use efficiency of the autotrophs increased by 37%. Ecosystem respiration intensified by 70%, and the metabolic balance became relatively more negative, i.e. biotic CO2 emissions increased by 125%. Heterotrophic respiration and production increased by 89%, and this was reflected by a shorter (-40%) uptake length (SwOC) and faster (+92%) mineralisation velocity of organic carbon. The proportion of DOC flux respired and organic carbon use efficiency by bacteria increased by 112%.\nC_LIO_LIMacroinvertebrate consumer density increased by 72% due to sucrose addition and consumer production was 1.8 times higher in the treatment than in the control at the end of the experiment. The trophic transfer efficiencies from resources to consumers were similar between the control and the treatment (2-5%).\nC_LIO_LISynthesis. Part of the carbon derived from natural allochthonous organic matter can feed the autotrophs via the CO2 produced by stream bacterial respiration, intermingling the green and brown webs. The interaction between autotrophs and bacteria shifted from mutualism to competition with carbon addition under nutrient limitation (N, P) increasing biotic CO2 emissions. Without nutrient limitation, mutualism could be reinforced by a positive feedback loop, maintaining the same biotic CO2 emissions. A small increase in dissolved organic carbon supply from climate and land use change could have large effects on stream food web and biogeochemistry with implications for the global C cycle under stoichiometric constraints.\nC_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Demars, B., Friberg, N., Kemp, J., Thornton, B.. 2018-10-20. Reciprocal carbon subsidies between autotrophs and bacteria in stream food webs under stoichiometric constraints. https://doi.org/10.1101/447987

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Beyond Single-Metric Assessments: Uncovering Masked Butterfly Declines via Multi-Scalar Analysis in Central Alberta

1. This study analyzed 21 years (2000-2025) of butterfly count data from Central Alberta, integrated with intensive 5-year (2021-2025) high-resolution intra-seasonal sampling. 2. Long-term macro-scale analysis revealed a significant decline in Shannon Diversity, a change that remained obscured when relying solely on traditional metrics of species richness and evenness. 3. This diversity decline was primarily driven by the severe, long-term collapse of the native Common Ringlet (Coenonympha tullia). 4. Four other dominant species--Cabbage White (Pieris rapae), Clouded Sulphur (Colias eriphyle), European Skipper (Thymelicus lineola), and Common Wood Nymph (Cercyonis pegala)--maintained long-term population stability, though their abundances were significantly constrained by extreme winter minimum temperatures and rapid spring warming. 5. High-resolution intra-seasonal analysis (2021-2025) demonstrated that community indices and species-specific abundances were strongly limited by daily weather, particularly wind velocity and temperature. 6. These findings illustrate that while traditional metrics like richness and evenness are fundamental to community ecology, they provide incomplete insights when applied in isolation; they are most effective when utilized as part of a complementary, multi-scalar framework. 7. This study highlights the necessity of coupling multi-decadal historical datasets with high-frequency, fine-scale sampling to accurately identify the mechanisms of community turnover that simpler metrics may overlook. 8. The results underscore the critical importance of standardized citizen science monitoring in quantifying environmental impacts and establishing conservation priorities for terrestrial insect groups.

ecology

From concentration to export: resource contrasts and bee traits shape pollinator spillover to crops

Floral plantings can either concentrate bees or export them to adjacent crops, yet the ecological conditions influencing these outcomes remain unclear. Here, we develop a mathematical model as proof of concept for our previous integrative hypothesis: concentrator and exporter outcomes can arise as alternative, context-dependent outcomes of the same underlying resource-selection process. Using bees as a model and focusing specifically on spillover from floral plantings to crops, we identified resource-specific thresholds separating concentration- and export-favoring conditions. Our model translates differences in relative patch attractiveness into context-dependent concentration and export outcomes and generates resource-specific, testable predictions about the conditions favoring pollinator movement into crops. In our simulations, the concentrator-exporter transition occurred at a lower flowering-intensity contrast than at pollen or nectar contrasts, which suggests that flowering intensity may provide an initial cue for bee movement, whereas nectar and pollen rewards refine or sustain bee responses once crops are perceived as attractive. Spillover thresholds differed among resource contrasts, whereas response steepness varied across bee-trait and community scenarios. Under the model's trait-sensitivity formulation, predicted spillover probability responded more strongly to flowering contrast for specialists than for generalists; colony size amplified this response, whereas bee richness dampened it. Together, these patterns show how flowering and resource contrasts interact with bee traits and community context to shape predicted spillover. Our results confirm that the concentrator and exporter hypotheses can be understood as context-dependent outcomes of the same ecological process rather than as mutually exclusive alternatives. Experimental tests of the predicted thresholds conducted in the field could reveal when and where floral plantings are most likely to promote bee spillover to crops, potentially supporting crop pollination.

ecology

A Computational Re-evaluation of Spatial Trials for Zoonotic Tuberculosis Control: Model Misspecification, Diagnostic Miss-classification, and the Illusion of Wildlife Culling Efficacy

1. Wildlife reservoir management frequently relies on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial's (RBCT) trade-off hypothesis, which posits that reductions in cattle herd infections are offset by a perturbation effect driven by disrupted host dispersal. This paper evaluates the computational and epidemiological robustness of this historical trial, which serves as the foundational empirical experiment guiding zoonotic tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) control policies. 2. Using generalized linear mixed models with a generalized Poisson error distribution to explicitly address historical data overdispersion, this study contrasts traditional parametric inference against exact cluster-constrained permutation tests across distinct operational definitions of disease incidence. 3. Non-parametric diagnostics reveal that previously reported treatment and perturbation effects render as statistical artifacts under exact non-parametric permutation. Inside culling zones, parametric significance fails to withstand exact permutation verification due to extreme data leverage in localized cluster blocks. 4. Crucially, when diagnostic misclassification biases are eliminated by analysing total reactor datasets, all apparent culling effects disappear, and information criteria overwhelmingly favour nested null architectures. Unconfirmed reactors likely represent true biological infections missed by low-sensitivity post-mortem macro-necropsy, proving that host removal tracks observation noise rather than genuine zoonotic transmission pathways. 5. Finally, empirical scaling conducted in this study identifies a novel mathematical saturation effect, demonstrating that this sub-linear scaling is an operational artifact of unmodelled herd-level disease recurrence over time. 6. Policy implications. Because current zoonotic tuberculosis intervention frameworks are built upon a structurally misspecified statistical model, they have driven large-scale veterinary policies resulting in substantial, unevidenced ecological and economic interventions while failing to provide genuine public health, animal health, or disease control benefits.

ecology