Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/423103

Boundaries support specific long-distance interactions between enhancers and promoters in Drosophila Bithorax complex

Georgiev, P.·Postika, N.·Metzler, M.·Affolter, M.·Müller, M.·Schedl, P.·Kyrchanova, O.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Drosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) is one of the best model systems for studying the role of boundaries (insulators) in gene regulation. Expression of three homeotic genes, Ubx, abd-A, and Abd-B, is orchestrated by nine parasegment-specific regulatory domains. These domains are flanked by boundary elements, which function to block crosstalk between adjacent domains, ensuring that they can act autonomously. Paradoxically, seven of the BX-C regulatory domains are separated from their gene target by at least one boundary, and must \"jump over\" the intervening boundaries. To understand the jumping mechanism, the Mcp boundary was replaced with Fab-7 and Fab-8. Mcp is located between the iab-4 and iab-5 domains, and defines the border between the set of regulatory domains controlling abd-A and Abd-B. When Mcp is replaced by Fab-7 or Fab-8, they direct the iab-4 domain (which regulates abd-A) to inappropriately activate Abd-B in abdominal segment A4. For the Fab-8 replacement, ectopic induction was only observed when it was inserted in the same orientation as the endogenous Fab-8 boundary. A similar orientation dependence for bypass activity was observed when Fab-7 was replaced by Fab-8. Thus, boundaries perform two opposite functions in the context of BX-C - they block crosstalk between neighboring regulatory domains, but at the same time actively facilitate long distance communication between the regulatory domains and their respective target genes.\n\nAuthor SummaryDrosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) is one of a few examples demonstrating in vivo role of boundary/insulator elements in organization of independent chromatin domains. BX-C contains three HOX genes, whose parasegment-specific pattern is controlled by cis-regulatory domains flanked by boundary/insulator elements. Since the boundaries ensure autonomy of adjacent domains, the presence of these elements poses a paradox: how do the domains bypass the intervening boundaries and contact their proper regulatory targets? According to the textbook model, BX-C regulatory domains are able to bypass boundaries because they harbor special promoter targeting sequences. However, contrary to this model, we show here that the boundaries themselves play an active role in directing regulatory domains to their appropriate HOX gene promoter.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

geneticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Georgiev, P., Postika, N., Metzler, M., Affolter, M., Müller, M., Schedl, P., Kyrchanova, O.. 2018-09-20. Boundaries support specific long-distance interactions between enhancers and promoters in Drosophila Bithorax complex. https://doi.org/10.1101/423103

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Cellular context shapes the transcriptomic impact of somatic variants

Somatic SNVs are commonly prioritized by recurrence or sequence annotation, leaving the molecular consequences of private variants unresolved. We developed PrismSNV and Ligo-Seq, a single-cell full-length transcriptome sequencing platform, to quantify transcriptomic displacement associated with within-cell SNV-state toggling. Across 26 samples from three cancer types, more than 60% of candidate SNVs showed significant cell-type-specific displacement with over 30% variation in magnitude. Sequence-based deleteriousness was poorly aligned with cellular displacement, and fewer than 3% of top-displacement SNVs across six tumor types were catalogued in ClinVar. Displacement was strongest in transcriptionally plastic, less differentiated states. Analysis of 655,349 CD4+ T-cell transcriptomes further showed that SNV-gene associations changed in magnitude and sometimes direction during activation. Lack of recurrence or clinical annotation does not imply transcriptomic inertness; variant impact is shaped by cellular context rather than sequence alone, establishing the variant-cell pair as a critical unit for interpreting somatic variation.

genetics↗
bioRxiv2026

Genetic and Epigenetic Landscape of Self-Identified Hispanics/Latino in All Of Us

Human genetic studies still underrepresent many populations, limiting discovery and interpretation of medically relevant variation. Extensive admixture in self-identified Hispanic/Latino populations increases the need for representative reference data and ancestry-aware interpretation of medically relevant variation. We used long-read sequencing to analyze genetic variation, ancestry, and DNA methylation in 1,490 self-identified Hispanic/Latino participants from the All of Us Research Program. We identified 10 million novel variants and more than 100 candidate phenotype associations, with fine-mapping prioritizing structural variants over nearby single-nucleotide variants in more than half. We linked 3,329 tandem repeats to DNA methylation, resolved widespread allele-specific methylation, and identified ancestry-linked regulation across paralogous genes. These results reveal previously inaccessible genetic and regulatory variation and show the value of long-read sequencing for diverse populations.

genetics↗
bioRxiv2026

The genetic architecture of human DNA methylome variation

Population DNA methylome analyses remain largely confined to reference-defined genomic space despite extensive human genetic diversity. A central challenge is therefore to define comparable methylation phenotypes across diverse genomes and map the genetic architecture of methylome variation. Here, using 460 haplotypes from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium Release 2, we develop two complementary pangenome-based frameworks: one compares methylation within homologous regions while retaining haplotype-specific structural configuration and CpG content; the other represents CpG island (CGI) variation at homologous loci as sequence-resolved alleles. We identified 47,039 CGI alleles, including 8,040 absent from CHM13; 62% were attributable to structural variants and 31% to small variants. Through local genealogies, we reconstructed CGI gain, loss and turnover, revealing how present-day methylation differences align with CGI evolutionary trajectories. We found that genome-wide, methylation variability was buffered against genetic diversity across more than 90% of the genome, with exceptions at extreme nucleotide diversity and locally around structural variants. Our methylation framework enabled population-scale allele-aware methylation quantitative trait locus (mQTL) mapping into non-reference and structurally complex sequence, where mQTL-associated intervals were enriched. mQTLs linked methylation to transcriptomic phenotypes, population differentiation and complex traits, supporting 8% of population differentially methylated regions and colocalizing with more than half of genome-wide association study loci. Together, our study redefines human methylome analysis and our findings reveal a genome-wide architecture of genetic-epigenetic coupling, reshaping how methylation variation is interpreted across human development and disease.

genetics↗