Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/382051

An Ishihara-style test of animal colour vision

Abstract

O_LIColour vision mediates ecologically relevant tasks for many animals, such as mate choice, foraging and predator avoidance. However, our understanding of animal colour perception is largely derived from human psychophysics, even though animal visual systems differ from our own. Behavioural tests of non-human animals are required to understand how colour signals are perceived by them.\nC_LIO_LIHere we introduce a novel test of colour vision in animals inspired by the Ishihara colour charts, which are widely used to identify human colour deficiencies. These charts consist of dots that vary in colour, brightness and size, and are designed so that a numeral or letter is distinguishable from distractor dots for humans with normal colour vision. In our method, distractor dots have a fixed chromaticity (hue and saturation) but vary in luminance. Animals can be trained to find single target dots that differ from distractor dots in chromaticity. We provide Matlab code for creating these stimuli, which can be modified for use with different animals.\nC_LIO_LIWe demonstrate the success of this method with triggerfish, Rhinecanthus aculeatus, and highlight behavioural parameters that can be measured, including success of finding the target dot, time to detect dot and error rate. Triggerfish quickly learnt to select target dots that differed from distractors dots regardless of the particular hue or saturation, and proved to use acute colour vision. We measured discrimination thresholds by testing the detection of target colours that were of increasing colour distances ({Delta}S) from distractor dots in different directions of colour space. At least for some colours, thresholds indicated better discrimination than expected from the Receptor Noise Limited (RNL) model assuming 5% Weber fraction for the long-wavelength cone.\nC_LIO_LIThis methodology seems to be highly effective because it resembles natural foraging behavior for the triggerfish and may well be adaptable to a range of other animals, including mammals, birds, bees and freshwater fish. Other questions may be addressed using this methodology, including luminance thresholds, sensory bias, effects of sensory noise in detection tasks, colour categorization and saliency.\nC_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cheney, K. L., Green, N., Vibert, A., Vorobyev, M., Marshall, J. N., Osorio, D. C., Endler, J. A.. 2018-08-01. An Ishihara-style test of animal colour vision. https://doi.org/10.1101/382051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Behavioral divergence across replicated predation regimes is species-specific in two sympatric poeciliid fishes

Predation is a potent driver of behavioral divergence across prey populations, yet whether shared predation regimes generate similar responses in coexisting prey species remains unclear. Species differences in reproductive and foraging traits may alter vulnerability to predators, generating species-specific responses. We compared behavior and cognition of two poeciliid fishes (Gambusia affinis and Poecilia latipinna) that differ in body size, the presence of male ornamentation, and mating tactics. We sampled both species across replicate high- and low-predation regimes and measured exploration, shyness, boldness, social motivation, and detour solve latency (N = 509). Multivariate behavior and cognition differed between predation regimes, and the magnitude of divergence varied with species but not body size. Consistent with the multivariate pattern, the more conspicuous P. latipinna exhibited higher boldness and overall lower exploration under high-predation, while high- and low-predation populations of G. affinis did not differ. These findings suggest either that the more conspicuous species experiences greater predation risk or that the less conspicuous species reduces its predation risk through alternative phenotypic responses. More broadly, species differences in reproductive phenotypes associated with sexual selection may help explain why shared predation regimes generate variable patterns of behavioral divergence across taxa.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Capturing the rhythm: methodological choices shape inference from circadian activity data

Abstract 1. Statistical tools and analytical decisions for analysing animal activity data are often limited and poorly justified, particularly with respect to model choice, sampling design and temporal aggregation. These shortcomings can constrain our ability to draw accurate and biologically meaningful inferences about behaviour. 2. We interrogated 24 h activity data taken from individual males and females derived from five Drosophila melanogaster populations to generate a general framework for collecting and analysing activity data that systematically compares common model classes, continuous verses fragmented sampling strategies, and alternative temporal aggregation choices (time-bin sizes). 3. Our analyses identified generalised additive mixed models (GAMMs) applied to high-frequency continuous data with small-moderate bin sizes (1-5 minutes) as providing the most robust and interpretable inference for our complex, high-frequency activity data. 4. However, our interrogation of the data set confirmed that analytical and sampling decisions need to be tailored to the study species, the timing of activities and the nature of the behaviour of interest. Accordingly, polynomial and cosinor generalised linear models, increased but biologically targeted snapshot sampling, and bin sizes smaller than one hour yielded adequate analyses with similar biological conclusions when appropriately matched to the system. 5. Our approach provides an accessible decision-making framework for activity analyses that allows researchers across behavioural, ecological and evolutionary studies to justify and optimise choices about data collection and modelling. Such an approach improves the biological relevance of inference and supporting the use of modern tracking and analytical technologies.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Greylag geese (Anser anser) initiate group flight based on the number and identities of callers

Social animals need to maintain cohesion when they move, and movement decisions are influenced by social organization and ecological or individual needs. To maintain synchrony during collective movement, the use of signals, including vocal signals, is often necessary. Greylag geese are gregarious and vocal before and during flight. We observed instances of naturally occurring flight initiation attempts in a free-living population of greylag geese -n = 133 birds- to investigate the decision-making process in this species, including the role vocalisations play in flight decisions. We recorded the number of participants in flight-initiation attempts, their vocal behaviour -using two call types specific to flight initiation signalling: Locomotion and Pre-flight calls-, the outcome of those attempts, in addition to the resulting flying group size and composition. We found that the identities and number of flock members joining in the calling chorus predicted both the probability of successful flight and the resulting flying group size. The number of Locomotion callers was associated with an increased probability of success, as well as larger flying group size, including both family and non-family fliers. The number of Pre-flight callers was also associated with a higher probability of successful flight, but its effect on the increase in flying group size was marginal. Successful departures were more probable when the family members of the initiator responded vocally. Overall, our findings are consistent with a system where the decision to fly is made individually using two distinct vocal signals to estimate the number of voters and at least the identities of social partners and progeny. In species where temporal and spatial group cohesion varies both seasonally and diurnally, individuals priorities appear to be maintaining proximity to mates and family members, followed by maximizing the size of flight groups.

animal behavior and cognition↗