Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/328245

Revealing biases in the sampling of ecological interaction networks

Abstract

The structure of ecological interactions is commonly understood through analyses of interaction networks. However, these analyses may be sensitive to sampling biases in both the interactors (the nodes of the network) and interactions (the links between nodes), because the detectability of species and their interactions is highly heterogeneous. These issues may affect the accuracy of empirically constructed ecological networks. Yet statistical biases introduced by sampling error are difficult to quantify in the absence of full knowledge of the underlying ecological networks structure. To explore properties of large-scale modular networks, we developed EcoNetGen, which constructs and samples networks with predetermined topologies. These networks may represent a wide variety of communities that vary in size and types of ecological interactions. We sampled these networks with different sampling designs that may be employed in field observations. The observed networks generated by each sampling process were then analyzed with respect to the number of components, size of components and other network metrics. We show that the sampling effort needed to estimate underlying network properties accurately depends both on the sampling design and on the underlying network topology. In particular, networks with random or scale-free modules require more complete sampling to reveal their structure, compared to networks whose modules are nested or bipartite. Overall, the modules with nested structure were the easiest to detect, regardless of sampling design. Sampling according to species degree (number of interactions) was consistently found to be the most accurate strategy to estimate network structure. Conversely, sampling according to module (representing different interaction types or taxa) results in a rather complete view of certain modules, but fails to provide a complete picture of the underlying network. We recommend that these findings be incorporated into field sampling design of projects aiming to characterize large species interactions networks to reduce sampling biases.\n\nAuthor SummaryEcological interactions are commonly modeled as interaction networks. Analyses of such networks may be sensitive to sampling biases and detection issues in both the interactors and interactions (nodes and links). Yet, statistical biases introduced by sampling error are difficult to quantify in the absence of full knowledge of the underlying networks structure. For insight into ecological networks, we developed software EcoNetGen (available in R and Python). These allow the generation and sampling of several types of large-scale modular networks with predetermined topologies, representing a wide variety of communities and types of ecological interactions. Networks can be sampled according to designs employed in field observations. We demonstrate, through first uses of this software, that underlying network topology interacts strongly with empirical sampling design, and that constructing empirical networks by starting with highly connected species may be the give the best representation of the underlying network.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

de Aguiar, M., Newman, E. A., Pires, M. M., Yeakel, J. D., Hembry, D. H., Boettinger, C., Burkle, L. A., Gravel, D., Guimaraes, P. R., O'Donnell, J. L., Poisot, T., Fortin, M.-J., Ecological Network Dynamics Working Group at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological,. 2018-05-22. Revealing biases in the sampling of ecological interaction networks. https://doi.org/10.1101/328245

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Validating static food web model diet matrices using stable isotope simulation

End-to-end ecosystem models, such as Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE), are valuable tools for resource management. Within these frameworks, trophic interactions, typically derived from stomach contents analyses, govern system-wide energy flow via consumption. However, stomach contents data may be unrepresentative of long-term average diets and assimilated consumption due to factors including differential digestion rates and identifiability of prey, introducing model uncertainty. Because trophic interactions define model structure, variation in modeled diets can alter predictions and management conclusions. Consequently, evaluating and reducing uncertainty in diet matrix compositions is critical for operational acceptance of ecosystem models. Stable isotope analysis provides complementary, time-integrated insight into average diets, but its application for EwE validation has largely been limited to evaluating trophic levels and isotopic niche space. Here, we present a quantitative framework for simulating consumer stable isotope signatures across food webs from parent ecosystem models using a matrix-based mixing model. Using a published Northern Gulf of Mexico EwE model as a case study, we demonstrate Monte Carlo simulation to propagate uncertainty from basal source signatures and trophic discrimination factors. Comparison of predicted signatures with empirical {delta}13C and {delta}34S measurements enables validation of primary carbon sources and benthic-pelagic pathway contributions, revealing agreement in isotope space alongside mismatch in energy pathways. Diagnostic residuals identify discrepancies in diet composition. Model scoring provides a reproducible framework for ranking alternative diet configurations. Redundancy analysis further identifies within-group species coverage differences between stomach contents and isotope datasets as a primary driver of mismatch, highlighting an important consideration for sampling design.

ecology↗

Enhancing Germination and Assessing the Longevity of Native Plants' Seeds with Dormancy through Different Priming Techniques

Vachellia pachyceras and Convolvulus oxyphyllus are native species of arid and semi-arid desert regions, including Kuwait. They are inherently adapted to extreme conditions characterized by high temperature, prolonged drought and limited rainfall. They contribute significantly, to restore the ecosystem by providing food and shelter for wildlife. Despite their ecological importance, seed germination in both species is constrained by dormancy, and natural recruitment of seedlings is limited by narrow and unpredictable rainfall windows, severely restricting opportunities for establishment. In this context, seed priming is an effective pre-sowing technique that enables uniform and rapid germination within the short window of favorable conditions. This study aims to identify the optimal seed-priming techniques for these two keystone native species and to assess the effect of priming on seed longevity. The seeds were scarified to remove the physical dormancy prior to priming treatments. Relative seed longevity was measured for primed seeds through artificial ageing and analyzed using probit analysis and analysis of variance. Results showed that hormonal priming [(mechanical scarification + 100 ppm gibberellic acid (GA3)] for six hours and hydropriming (mechanical scarification + soaking in water) for 8 hours (h) were effective treatments among the tested priming treatments for V. pachyceras. The estimated p50 value (i.e., number of days to lose seed viability to 50%) was 22 days for hormonal priming and 21 days for hydropriming. Mechanical scarification followed by one and half hour of hydropriming was the most effective in C. oxyphyllus (p50 = 74 days). Based on these results, the longevity of V. pachyceras and C. oxyphyllus could be considered medium. Further studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of seed priming on additional ecologically and economically important native species to achieve success in revegetation programs.

ecology↗

Restoration decisions in highly variable systems: Whether, when, and how to enhance kelp

In highly variable ecosystems, natural variability can obscure signals of decline that warrant intervention, as there is often a lack of long-term data needed to distinguish between declines that are transient and likely to recover naturally and those that would be permanent without intervention. Implementing restoration for a species involves deciding on a threshold condition at which to intervene, duration that this threshold needs to be met before intervening, life stages at introduction, and amounts to introduce. Current bull and giant kelp restoration efforts in California were spurred by persistent kelp loss that started in 2013 following a disease outbreak among predators of the primary herbivore and a marine heatwave. We asked how decisions about intervention cue, threshold, wait time, life stage at introduction, and amount affect population outcomes against a backdrop of environmental variability. We analyzed additional context-dependencies on grazing and climate intensity. To address these questions, we built and parameterized a stochastic stage-structured model for bull and giant kelp, in which we simulated kelp enhancement approaches under a range of grazing and climate scenarios. In a global sensitivity analysis of kelp enhancement decisions, we found that grazing intensity and life stages at introduction were the most influential determinants of kelp biomass and persistence outcomes. The kelp enhancement approach involving temporarily introduced juveniles restored the germ banks of bull and giant kelp, but the two species differed in their responses to that intervention, highlighting that optimal intervention approach is species-dependent. Waiting longer for natural recovery before intervening reduced total intervention effort but also reduced biomass recovery potential. These results support empirical findings from kelp enhancement pilot projects in California and highlight context-dependencies that inform restoration decision-making in kelp forests and other highly variable ecosystems.

ecology↗