Search bioRxivSearch

bioRxiv · 10.1101/238543

Catching up to a fast-moving target: Evaluation of a health system strengthening intervention in rural Rwanda 2005-2010 using data from repeated cross-sectional surveys

Abstract

IntroductionAlthough Rwandas health system underwent major reforms and improvements after the 1994 Genocide, the health system and population health in the southeast lagged behind other areas. In 2005 Partners In Health and the Rwandan Ministry of Health began a health system strengthening intervention in this region.\n\nMethodsCombining results from the 2005 and 2010 Demographic and Health Surveys with those from a supplemental 2010 survey, we compared changes in health system output indicators and population health outcomes between 2005 and 2010 as reported by 21,338 women living in the intervention area and similar rural areas, controlling for potential confounding by economic and demographic variables.\n\nResultsOverall health system coverage improved similarly in both regions between 2005 and 2010, with an indicator of composite coverage of child health interventions increasing from 57.9% to 75.0% in the intervention area and from 58.7% to 73.8% in other rural areas. Despite experiencing poorer health outcomes in 2005, the intervention area caught up to or exceeded other rural areas on 23 of 25 indicators. Most notably, under-five mortality declined by an annual rate of 12.8% in the intervention area, from 229.8 to 83.2 deaths per 1000 live births, and by 8.9% in other rural areas, from 157.7 to 75.8 deaths per 1000 live births. Improvements were most dramatic among the poorest households.\n\nConclusionWe observed dramatic improvements in population health outcomes including under-five mortality between 2005 and 2010 in rural Rwanda generally, and in the intervention area specifically.\n\nSUMMARY BOXO_ST_ABSWhat is already known about this topic?C_ST_ABSO_LIMuch of the evidence that health system strengthening in rural Africa has improved health outcomes comes from studies of targeted regional interventions such as performance based financing or community health worker programs, rather than integrated interventions that encompass multiple components including infrastructure and supply chain investments, health management information system, workforce training and incentives at all levels, community health workers, and free services for poor patients.\nC_LIO_LIIn addition to these experimental or quasi-experimental studies, a series of case studies have documented individual nations, pathways to achieving millennium development goal 4 target, the reduction of under-five mortality by two thirds between 1990 and 2015.\nC_LIO_LIThese reports suggest that improvements in coverage of reproductive, maternal and child health indicators explain some, but not all, of the decline in child mortality and that these successes occurred in the context of national gains in health, nutrition and food security, sanitation, poverty reduction, and access to clean water.\nC_LI\n\nWhat are the new findings?O_LICoverage of most maternal and child health care interventions improved at a similar pace in our rural intervention area and other rural areas.\nC_LIO_LIDespite experiencing poorer health outcomes in 2005, our rural intervention area caught up to or exceeded other rural areas on 23 of 25 population health indicators by 2010.\nC_LIO_LIInfant and under-5 mortality declined in our rural intervention area even more precipitously than in other rural areas of Rwanda between 2005 and 2010.\nC_LI\n\nHow might this influence practice?O_LIThe process of strengthening national health systems often involves trade-offs between a focus on first testing individual programs that distributed widely, as is often practiced by pilot programs with multilateral institutions, or implementing multiple simultaneous programs locally. Our results show that integrated health system strengthening interventions can be locally adapted to enable the rapid expansion of health care coverage as well as dramatic improvements in population health outcomes.\nC_LIO_LIIntegrated multi-level interventions can also help narrow the health care coverage and outcome gap between richer and poorer members of a society.\nC_LIO_LINational governments can leverage nongovernmental partners to achieve the health related sustainable development goals through joint implementation of national health policy.\nC_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Thomson, D., Amoroso, C., Atwood, S., Bonds, M. H., Rwabukwisi, F. C., Drobac, P., Finnegan, K. E., Farmer, D. B., Farmer, P. E., Habinshuti, A., Hirschhorn, L. R., Manzi, A., Niyigena, P., Rich, M. L., Stulac, S., Murray, M., Binagwaho, A.. 2017-12-22. Catching up to a fast-moving target: Evaluation of a health system strengthening intervention in rural Rwanda 2005-2010 using data from repeated cross-sectional surveys. https://doi.org/10.1101/238543

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Translating surveillance data into incidence estimates

Monitoring a population for a disease requires the hosts to be sampled and tested for the pathogen. This results in sampling series from which to estimate the disease incidence, i.e. the proportion of hosts infected. Existing estimation methods assume that disease incidence is not changing between monitoring rounds, resulting in underestimation of the disease incidence. In this paper we develop an incidence estimation model accounting for epidemic growth with monitoring rounds sampling varying incidence. We also show how to accommodate the asymptomatic period characteristic to most diseases. For practical use, we produce an approximation of the model, which is subsequently shown accurate for relevant epidemic and sampling parameters. Both the approximation and the full model are applied to stochastic spatial simulations of epidemics. The results prove their consistency for a very wide range of situations.

epidemiology

The Swiss Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia registry: objectives, methods and first results

Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare hereditary, multi-organ disease caused by defects in ciliary structure and function. It results in a wide range of clinical manifestations, most commonly in the upper and lower airways. Central data collection in national and international registries is essential to studying the epidemiology of rare diseases and filling in gaps in knowledge of diseases such as PCD. For this reason, the Swiss Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Registry (CH-PCD) was founded in 2013 as a collaborative project between epidemiologists and adult and paediatric pulmonologists.\n\nThe registry records patients of any age, suffering from PCD, who are treated and resident in Switzerland. It collects information from patients identified through physicians, diagnostic facilities, and patient organisations. The registry dataset contains data on diagnostic evaluations, lung function, microbiology and imaging, symptoms, treatments, and hospitalizations.\n\nBy May 2018, CH-PCD has contacted 566 physicians of different specialties and identified 134 patients with PCD. At present this number represents an overall 1 in 63,000 prevalence of people diagnosed with PCD in Switzerland. Prevalence differs by age and region; it is highest in children and adults younger than 30 years, and in Espace Mittelland. The median age of patients in the registry is 25 years (range 5-73), and 49 patients have a definite PCD diagnosis based on recent international guidelines. Data from CH-PCD are contributed to international collaborative studies and the registry facilitates patient identification for nested studies.\n\nCH-PCD has proven to be a valuable research tool that already has highlighted weaknesses in PCD clinical practice in Switzerland. Development of centralised diagnostic and management centres and adherence to international guidelines are needed to improve diagnosis and management--particularly for adult PCD patients.

epidemiology

Perfect Counterfactuals for Epidemic Simulations

Simulation studies are often used to predict the expected impact of control measures in infectious disease outbreaks. Typically, two independent sets of simulations are conducted, one with the intervetnion, and one without, and epidemic sizes (or some related metric) are compared to estimate the effect of the intervention. Since it is possible that controlled epidemics are larger than uncontrolled ones if there is substantial stochastic variation between epidemics, uncertainty intervals from this approach can include a negative effect even for an effective intervention. To more precisely estimate the number of cases an intervention will prevent within a single epidemic, here we develop a single world approach to matching simulations of controlled epidemics to their exact uncontrolled counterfac-tual. Our method borrows concepts from percolation approaches prune out possible epidemic histories and create potential epidemic graph that can be realized to create perfectly matched controlled and uncontrolled epidemics. We present an implementation of this method for a common class of compartmental models, and its application in a simple SIR model. Results illustrate how, at the cost of some computation time, this method substantially narrows confidence intervals and avoids non-sensical inferences.

epidemiology