Shared understanding is correlated with shared neural responses in the default mode network

Abstract

Humans have a striking ability to infer meaning from even the sparsest and most abstract forms of narratives. At the same time, flexibility in the form of a narrative is matched by inherent ambiguity in the interpretation of it. How does the brain represent subtle, idiosyncratic differences in the interpretation of abstract and ambiguous narratives? In this fMRI study, we scanned subjects watching a 7-min original animation that depicts a complex narrative through the movement of simple geometric shapes. We additionally scanned two separate groups listening to concrete verbal descriptions of either the social narrative or the physical properties of the movie. After scanning, all subjects freely recalled their interpretation of the stimulus. Using an intersubject representational similarity analysis, we compared the similarity of narrative interpretation across subjects, as measured using text analysis, with the similarity of neural responses, as measured using intersubject correlation (ISC). We found that the more similar two peoples interpretations of the abstract shape movie were, the more similar their neural responses were in the default mode network (DMN). Moreover, these shared responses were modality invariant: despite vast differences in stimulus properties, we found that the shapes movie and the verbal interpretation of the movie elicited shared responses in linguistic areas and a subset of the DMN when subjects shared interpretations. Together, these results suggest that the DMN is not only sensitive to subtle individual differences in narrative interpretation, but also resilient to large differences in the modality of the narrative.\n\nSignificance statementThe same narrative can be both communicated in different ways and interpreted in different ways. How are subtle, idiosyncratic differences in the interpretation of complex narratives presented in different forms represented in the brain? In this fMRI study, we show that the more similarly two people interpreted an ambiguous animation composed of moving shapes, the more similar their neural responses were in the Default Mode Network. In addition, by presenting the same narrative in a different form, we found shared responses across modalities when subjects shared interpretations despite the vast differences in modality of the stimuli. Together, these results suggest that the DMN is at once sensitive to individual differences in narrative interpretation and resilient to differences narrative modality.