Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.11.24.690117

Eduomics: a Nextflow pipeline to simulate -omics data for education

Abstract

Moving past learning just algorithms and code is a key challenge of bioinformatics education: the ideal goal is for students to acquire higher-order knowledge such as the ability to solve biological problems with the appropriate tools, and more importantly learn to interpret the results in the broader context where bioinformatics is needed. To design such a teaching and learning experience, data simulations play a key role: however, there is a massive barrier to adoption. Different data types are produced by different tools, requiring educators to learn each of them and adapt their workflow to the necessary dependencies, requirements and input files. Additionally, most existing data simulation solutions are meant for benchmarking and methods development rather than education and cannot provide the context needed to teach students the critical interpretation skills they need to move beyond problem-based learning to what we call storyline-based learning. A significant effort must be placed also when many datasets with the same characteristics are needed, such as in tutoring or assessment in higher education. Here, we present eduomics: a Nextflow pipeline meant to automate the simulation workflow for both genomic and transcriptomic next-generation sequencing data, and to produce realistic clinical scenarios to provide students with clues and a biomedical story necessary for the interpretation of their results. Eduomics removes barriers to adoption, by requiring the user to just decide which chromosome datasets should be simulated on, and which type of data they would like to simulate. There is no need to learn specific tools and resolve their dependencies. The use of Gemini API provides an innovative approach to generate plausible clinical scenarios, consistent with the genes where either a pathological mutation or differential expression has been simulated. With eduomics, we offer an accessible and scalable solution to design comprehensive learning experiences and innovate bioinformatics education. Author SummaryModern bioinformatics education faces a dual challenge: students must learn how to analyse data and interpret results within the biological problems they aim to solve, while instructors who wish to design such a comprehensive learning experience should introduce appropriately simulated data in their teaching. However, the complexity of existing simulation tools is an often daunting barrier to overcome: current solutions require different software for different data types and provide no support for teaching interpretation skills. Most available simulators were designed for benchmarking and method development, not for education: therefore they lack the biological and clinical context needed to move beyond the traditional problem-based learning. To address these challenges, we developed eduomics, a Nextflow-based end-to-end pipeline that automates the simulation of genomic and transcriptomic data in a fully automated manner for educational use. Educators only need to choose the type of data to simulate, while the pipeline handles all underlying tools and dependencies. As a groundbreaking element, we integrated the Google Gemini API to generate patient-inspired clinical scenarios that gives students realistic clues and a biomedical narrative in which to interpret the results. This approach complements the traditional problem-based learning by offering a more complete, storyline-based learning experience. By combining automated data simulation and clinical storytelling, eduomics provides an accessible and scalable solution that support an engaging and immersive learning experience for both educators and students.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sola, L., Bagordo, D., Carpanzano, S., Santorsola, M., Lescai, F.. 2025-11-27. Eduomics: a Nextflow pipeline to simulate -omics data for education. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.24.690117

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗