bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.11.08.687368
Comparison of volumetric dynamic optical coherence tomography with biological methods for evaluation of radiation effects in prostate tumor spheroids
Abstract
Significance3D tumor spheroids are more physiologically representative of in vivo patient tumors compared to 2D monolayer culture. However, their 3D nature challenges the use of conventional biological techniques like proliferation assays, fluorescence microscopy, and the clonogenic assay, which is the gold standard method for assessing cell survival following radiation. However, clonogenic assay requires spheroid disaggregation. AimNon-invasive volumetric imaging with dynamic optical coherence tomography (dOCT) enables cellular activity to be visualized with spatial resolution within 3D tumor spheroids. Cellular activity observed via dOCT in irradiated prostate tumor spheroids was quantified for comparison with conventional biological techniques. ApproachA Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator was used to irradiate spheroid and monolayer cultures with a 6 MV beam. Cellular activity was estimated from dOCT images generated via frequency banding and compared to clonogenic assay, proliferation assay, fluorescence microscopy, and 3D cell simulation. ResultsProstate cancer cells cultured as spheroids demonstrated improved radio-resistance via clonogenic assay compared to monolayer culture. The dOCT method demonstrated quantitative and qualitative agreement with proliferation assay and fluorescence microscopy, respectively. ConclusionsA longer duration of repeated dOCT measurement in tumor spheroids following radiation treatment could offer a non-invasive alternative to the clonogenic assay.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Swanson, S., Chen, K., Cheraghi, E., Osei, E., Bizheva, K.. 2025-11-10. Comparison of volumetric dynamic optical coherence tomography with biological methods for evaluation of radiation effects in prostate tumor spheroids. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.08.687368
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.