Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.11.01.685890

Differential Control of HIV-1 Replication by IFN-α14 Compared to IFN-α2 Relates to Differences in the Modulation of Host Antiretroviral Restriction Factors

Abstract

Type I IFN, including IFN-, induces the expression of antiviral restriction factors that can interfere with multiple steps of the HIV-1 replication cycle. Humans have 13 IFN- genes which encode 12 different IFN- subtypes. Our previous work in HIV-1 infected humanized mice showed that IFN-14 treatment more potently controlled HIV-1 than treatment with the clinically approved IFN-2 subtype. However, the mechanisms behind the more potent control of HIV-1 by IFN-14 are unknown. The IFN-14 subtype is known to more potently induce the expression of the restriction factors MX2 and ISG15 and increased APOBEC3G signature mutations in vivo compared to IFN-2. To study the importance of each of these restriction factors in mediating the potent control of HIV-1, we used a CRISPR-Cas9 lentivirus system to create stable knockouts in the MT4C5 cell line that is susceptible to HIV-1 but does not produce measurable amounts of endogenous IFN-. Knock out of ISG15, but not MX2, eliminated differences in viral suppression after IFN-14 and IFN-2 treatment. Similarly, APOBEC3G deletion eliminated differences in viral suppression and the number of infectious particles produced after IFN-14 and IFN-2 treatment. Furthermore, APOBEC3G deletion resulted in significantly fewer GG[->]AG mutations in viral DNA isolated from target cells incubated with supernatant from IFN-14 treated groups. However, APOBEC3G knock out did not result in significant increases in vDNA compared to the wild type in any experimental group. Overall, elimination of APOBEC3G and ISG15 impaired IFN-14-mediated suppression of HIV-1, highlighting them as downstream effectors of IFN-14s more potent anti-HIV-1 activity. IMPORTANCEThis study uncovers the molecular basis for the more potent antiviral activity of IFN-14 compared to the clinically used IFN-2 subtype against HIV-1. Although interferons are known to induce numerous restriction factors, the mechanisms underlying subtype-specific antiviral potency remained unclear. By using CRISPR-Cas9 knockout MT4C5 cell lines, the study identifies ISG15 and APOBEC3G as key effectors mediating IFN-14s enhanced suppression of HIV-1 replication. Loss of either ISG15 or APOBEC3G abolished the differential antiviral effect between IFN-14 and IFN-2, demonstrating their essential roles in IFN-14 driven viral restriction. These findings highlight that individual IFN- subtypes engage distinct downstream pathways and that subtype diversity encodes functional specialization rather than redundancy. Overall, this work advances our understanding of innate immune control of HIV-1 and provides a foundation for developing targeted interferon-based therapies that exploit the unique mechanisms of potent subtypes like IFN- 14.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rout, S. S., Stewart, M. T. E., Seidel, N. B., Dittmer, U., Sutter, K., Lavender, K. J.. 2025-11-03. Differential Control of HIV-1 Replication by IFN-α14 Compared to IFN-α2 Relates to Differences in the Modulation of Host Antiretroviral Restriction Factors. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.01.685890

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Common viral infections seed regionally distinct resident memory T cells in the human CNS

T cells persist in the central nervous system (CNS) and can drive both protection and neurological disease. How these cells are organized in humans and what they recognize is largely unknown. Here, we profiled CD8 T cells across anatomically distinct CNS regions, obtained through on-site autopsies and temporal lobe resection surgeries, using single-cell RNA sequencing, paired T cell receptor sequencing, and DNA-barcoded tetramers. Resident memory T cells (TRM) specific for Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2 were identified across CNS compartments. Anatomical location was the strongest correlate of TRM cell state, with leptomeningeal cells adopting a cytokine-poised TRM program, whereas brain TRM cells were transcriptionally restrained. Cells of the same clonotype spanned tissues yet adopted local transcriptional states. Viral specificity added another layer of TRM heterogeneity with GZMK/GZMA-expressing EBV-specific populations and interferon-stimulated gene signatures in SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A-specific cells. The human CNS thus harbors regionally distinct CD8+ TRM shaped by common viral exposures.

immunology↗

A regulatory T cell signature provides a shared molecular basis for the therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatic disease

Rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and osteoarthritis (OA), show distinct phenotypes yet respond to overlapping therapies, implicating shared immune mechanisms. In the Transimmunom cohort, we profiled peripheral blood from 240 individuals (47 healthy, 44 OA, 91 RA, 58 SpA) across deep immunophenotyping, immunoproteomics and Treg-Teff transcriptomics. Single-layer analyses revealed broader Treg than Teff remodeling, along with a shared pattern of reduced activated Tregs and expanded Helios+ Tregs across all diseases, alongside a decrease in functional Treg subpopulations, including CTLA4+ and CD45RA- Tregs. In RA specifically, LAG3+ Tregs were also expanded. Combining omics layers outperformed single-layer approaches for disease classification. Among individual layers, Treg transcriptomes were most discriminative, and integration uncovered disease-specific programs. Unsupervised clustering identified a cross-disease cluster independent of activity, treatment and age, mapping to early disease (<= years) and dominated by a Treg dysfunction-associated program. These results provide a biological rationale for the therapeutic "window of opportunity" concept and duration-stratified Treg-directed trials.

immunology↗

Inhibitory Fc Receptor sets a time limit on macrophage response to IgG

Antibodies engage both activating Fc Receptors and the inhibitory receptor Fc{gamma}RIIB. Why macrophages need a dedicated inhibitory receptor rather than simply tuning activating receptor signaling is unclear. Using DNA-based chimeric receptors and in silico modeling, we independently controlled activating and inhibitory Fc Receptors. We found that Fc{gamma}RIIB imposed a time limit on macrophage phagocytosis and ERK signaling. The time limit is due to activating Fc Receptors converting PI(4,5)P2 to PI(3,4,5)P3, which is subsequently converted to PI(3,4)P2 by Fc{gamma}RIIB. This leads to a pulse of active signaling, which is sufficient for phagocytosis of small bacteria-sized targets but not phagocytosis of large targets and TNF secretion. Unlike engaging Fc{gamma}RIIB, reducing activating Fc Receptor signaling decreased initiation of phagocytosis, the speed of PI(3,4,5)P3 generation, and the amplitude of ERK signaling. Our results demonstrate that Fc{gamma}RIIB controls the duration of IgG signaling, while the activating Fc Receptors control sensitivity.

immunology↗