Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.09.19.677263

NanoDel: a long-read sequencing pipeline for identifying large-scale mitochondrial DNA deletions validated in patient samples clinically diagnosed with mitochondrial disease and evaluated in glioblastoma.

Abstract

MotivationTraditional methods for detecting large-scale mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions (LSMDs) in cells present challenges, i.e. a priori information, high DNA inputs, poor sensitivity and are not always quantitative. Mitigation can be achieved through high throughput DNA sequencing using e.g. Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), in combination with LSMD breakpoint identification and quantification using bioinformatic tools. Splice-aware RNA alignment tools increase the sensitivity for detecting LSMD breakpoints compared with DNA aligners. Long-read sequencing (LRS) also offers potential advantages over short read sequencing, e.g. greater read lengths and capturing variants on single reads. No existing pipelines capture the benefits of both a splice-aware alignment tool and LRS. ResultsWe developed "NanoDel", a LRS pipeline, to sensitively and accurately detect cellular LSMDs. Using artificial datasets, "NanoDel" was more sensitive and accurate than other pipelines. In samples diagnosed with mitochondrial disease, it identified both known and previously uncharacterised (including mixtures) of LSMDs, without a priori information. LSMD breakpoints were found in mt-co1, mt-cyb, mt-nd6 and mt-nd5 genes. Analysis of selected LSMDs revealed proximity to repeat and putative G-quadruplex motifs, and occurrence in a range of healthy and pathological tissues, indicating potential for a shared vulnerability landscape in mtDNA, shaped by sequence motifs and structural constraints. "NanoDel" combined with one-amplicon, not two-amplicon, LR-PCR offers a robust strategy with clinical application for detecting LSMDs across a variety of cell/tissue samples, and its application across a broader range of samples, will yield new mechanistic insights into LSMD formation, and further our understanding of mtDNA instability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fearn, C., Oliva, C., Griguer, C., Poulton, J., Fratter, C., McGeehan, J., Baldock, R., Robson, S., McGeehan, R.. 2025-09-21. NanoDel: a long-read sequencing pipeline for identifying large-scale mitochondrial DNA deletions validated in patient samples clinically diagnosed with mitochondrial disease and evaluated in glioblastoma.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.19.677263

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗