Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.09.11.675542

Perfect imperfections: seeking molecular and cellular asymmetries in the mouse brain

Abstract

Although perfect symmetry is a mathematical ideal, many Bilateria exhibit left-right asymmetries of body, brain and behavior that are adaptive 1-3. In the human brain, various aspects of cognition are lateralized, including language 4 and handedness 5, which rely on left hemisphere dominance in most people. Brain hemispheric specialization can support parallel processing, neural efficiency, and action selection 3,6, while atypical structural or functional asymmetries are often found in neuropsychiatric disorders 7-10. Mice may be useful models for studying brain asymmetry because they show hemispheric differences of structure 11,12 and neurophysiology 13, but the extent to which molecular and cellular differences are involved remains unknown. We applied spatial transcriptomics with single molecule resolution to coronal sections from 31 adult mouse brains, to assess left-right differences of gene expression and cell types. Sections were chosen to capture the hippocampus and auditory cortex, as these two regions have shown the most prior evidence for functional asymmetry 13-15. In the hippocampus, Crhr1 (Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor 1) was more highly expressed in the pyramidal layers of CA1, CA3 and the dentate gyrus of the left hemisphere compared to the right. In the auditory cortex, three principal components capturing transcriptomic variation showed hemispheric differences, including prominent contributions from genes that have shown associations with human brain asymmetry. Overall cellular density and cell type proportions generally showed no significant hemispheric differences, with Car3 cortical excitatory neurons showing the most laterality. The transcriptional left-right differences that we found may relate to functional asymmetries for learning, memory and hearing. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=195 SRC="FIGDIR/small/675542v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (119K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1530502org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16dd244org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@107950corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ca52a3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LIMolecular and cellular basis of functional brain asymmetry is barely known C_LIO_LISpatial transcriptomics with cellular resolution applied to mouse brain coronal sections C_LIO_LIGenes implicated in human brain asymmetry showed hemispheric differences in mice C_LIO_LINo hemispheric differences of cell type abundances C_LI

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Houwing, D. J., Wang, M.-Y., Silberfeld, A., van Hulten, J. A., Lütje, L., Homberg, J. R., Fisher, S. E., Grandjean, J., Francks, C.. 2025-09-11. Perfect imperfections: seeking molecular and cellular asymmetries in the mouse brain. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.11.675542

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A Mechanistic Account of Dedifferentiation in the Aging Visual System

To uncover the mechanisms of age-related dedifferentiation, we simulated neural degradation in a computational model of the ventral visual stream. Severing connections or adding noise, whether in inferotemporal cortex (IT) or upstream, reduced IT differentiation, indicating that dedifferentiation need not originate locally. Degrading peripheral V1, which preferentially drove place-selective IT neurons, selectively reduced place differentiation, a candidate mechanism for the stronger place dedifferentiation reported in aging.

neuroscience↗

Reusing pipettes in Patch-seq: a foundation for automated multimodal profiling

Patch-seq is a technique for single-cell multimodal characterization. It combines whole-cell electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, and morphological reconstruction in single neurons. Patch-seq morphologies are a critical bridge among cell types, genes, physiology, and large-scale connectivity platforms such as EM connectomes and single-cell-resolution projectomes. However, patch-seq experimental complexity and operator dependence limit throughput. Automation could enable scalable Patch-seq but requires procedural adaptations, including detergent-based pipette cleaning, robotic nucleus extraction and collection. The impact of these automations on Patch-seq quality has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we show that each of these modifications preserves or improves key Patch-seq outcomes. Automated nucleus extraction performs comparably to, or better than, expert manual operation, preserving key RNA and morphological metrics. Detergent-cleaned, reused pipettes supported a viable sealing success rate across multiple cleaning cycles and preserved electrophysiological quality and transcriptomic yield without introducing excess contamination. Sonication effectively allows collection of nuclear material without damaging RNA and supports subsequent pipette cleaning and reuse. Enhanced automated sealing and break-in procedures increased throughput regardless of brain region, cell type or species. Together, these results validate the core procedural adaptations required for automated Patch-seq and establish a foundation for high-throughput, standardized multimodal single-cell characterization.

neuroscience↗

Development of direction selectivity in the Xenopus tadpole optic tectum and midbrain tegmentum

Detecting motion direction is a fundamental function performed by direction selective (DS) neurons. DS neurons in the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) enable the tracking of moving objects. DS neurons of the accessory optic system support reflexive eye / head movements that stabilize gaze during self-motion. By developmental stage 48 (10 days postfertilization), Xenopus tadpoles display visually guided behaviors that require both types of DS neurons. Our previous work has shown that these two regions are not only functionally distinct but also follow different developmental programs. Here we characterized and compared how direction selectivity develops in both visual processing centers. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings during moving bar visual stimulation, we measured DS synaptic inputs and spiking outputs in both regions across three key developmental stages of the retinotectal projection. Tegmental neurons were direction selective ab initio, and both input and output tuning remained stable across development. Tectal neurons were observed to receive DS inputs early, and their input selectivity also remained stable across development. However, their spiking output grew substantially more DS at the later developmental stage. This was due at least in part to a naturally occurring decrease in intrinsic excitability which preferentially dampened overall spike rates, but especially in response to the non-preferred direction of motion, thereby increasing direction selectivity. These results reveal distinct developmental trajectories in parallel visual pathways. Tegmental direction selectivity is established early and stays stable, whereas tectal output tuning sharpens during development through a decrease in intrinsic excitability.

neuroscience↗