Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.09.11.675379

Reducing the environmental footprint of laboratory research using visual communications: A pilot study in Spain

Marco-Ferreres, R.·Ayora, S.·Cela, C.·Sahun-Espanol, A.·Lopez-Sanz, M.·Izquierdo, P.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Addressing the environmental impact of laboratory research provides a meaningful opportunity for workplace-level mitigation. However, in Spain, the importance of sustainability in research is only starting to be recognised at a national level. We developed a scalable, visual-oriented communications strategy that was designed with input from scientific staff and included a live seminar and a coherent set of graphic materials. Five pillars were targeted: three key areas of consumption (energy, water, and plastic use), procurement, and colleague engagement. The scheme was piloted in two of the largest biomedical research centres in Spain: the Severo Ochoa Molecular Biology Centre (CBM) and the Spanish National Centre for Biotechnology (CNB). The pilot engaged 50 laboratories and services across both centres, of which 34 were followed up for 5 months. The results indicate engagement with sustainability measures and shifts toward best practice across metrics, including equipment switch-off, water use, plastic item reuse, and purchasing decisions. During the follow-up period, 23% of participants adopted new measures related to freezer maintenance, decluttering, or sample organization, 55% removed old data from storage to save energy, 100% reduced their use of lifts, and 94% discussed research sustainability with their laboratory/group. The findings also revealed key areas for improvement, including the management of shared resources and resistance to change protocols. These results offer a wide range of quantitative and qualitative insights to guide further efforts and scaling at regional and national levels. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=114 SRC="FIGDIR/small/675379v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (37K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b50baeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11ccdeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a13b46org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13a9b0b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Sustainability spotlightThis paper describes a scalable, visual-oriented communications strategy that can be used to promote sustainable behaviours in research laboratories. We present pilot results indicating engagement in sustainability and shifts toward best practice across metrics. Our work contributes to UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9 (industry and infrastructure) and SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production).

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marco-Ferreres, R., Ayora, S., Cela, C., Sahun-Espanol, A., Lopez-Sanz, M., Izquierdo, P.. 2025-09-12. Reducing the environmental footprint of laboratory research using visual communications: A pilot study in Spain. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.11.675379

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Multi-Lab Testing of Early Preclinical Discoveries Identifies Promising Treatments

A fundamental challenge in drug development is the frequent failure of early laboratory research to translate into clinical benefit. One promising solution is to confirm findings from exploratory single-laboratory studies across multiple laboratories before clinical testing. We investigated this approach following the conduct of preclinical multi-laboratory studies across different fields of medicine. For this, we evaluated effect sizes, experimental rigor, and a set of criteria to identify determinants of confirmation success. When tested under increased rigor, only a fraction of multi-laboratory studies confirmed the initial results. The underlying effect size reduction was associated with outcome-relevant experimental differences between exploratory and confirmatory stages. In summary, multi-laboratory studies proved highly informative and served as an effective filter for promising treatments.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2026

Technology-enhanced learning in undergraduate neuroscience education: tractography-based virtual dissection in psychology

Background: Neuroanatomy poses a significant challenge for Psychology students due to its spatial and conceptual complexity. Educational approaches that enhance the relevance and visualization of neuroanatomical content may improve students learning experiences. This study implemented a tractography-based activity focused on the virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus, a major white matter pathway, in undergraduate Psychology students and examined the relationships between perceived learning and students perceptions of utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Methods: First-year undergraduate Psychology students participated in a two-session tractography-based activity combining instruction on white matter anatomy and diffusion tractography with a hands-on virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus using research-grade software routinely employed in neuroscience research. Following the activity, students completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing perceived learning, utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Pearson correlations, multiple regression analyses, and relative importance analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-eight students completed the questionnaire. Students reported generally positive perceptions of the activity across the evaluated dimensions, with perceived learning receiving the highest mean score (M = 3.44, SD = .85). Perceived utility showed the strongest association with perceived learning (r = .64, p < .001). The regression model explained 41% of the variance in perceived learning (R2 = .41, adjusted R2 = .38, p < .001). Perceived utility was the only significant predictor in the model ({beta} = .59, p = .001), accounting for 67.9% of the explained variance. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of integrating authentic neuroimaging tools into undergraduate neuroanatomy teaching. Students who perceived the activity as more useful also reported higher perceived learning outcomes, with perceived utility emerging as the strongest predictor of perceived learning. In contrast, perceived difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects did not make significant independent contributions. These results suggest that students perceptions of educational relevance may play an important role in technology-enhanced STEM learning experiences.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2026

A randomized trial of grant writing coaching groups: Qualitative interviews revealing key elements of intervention efficacy

Background Training in grant proposal writing is an essential component of professional development for academic scientists in the biomedical and behavioral sciences. Despite the expansion of inter- and intra-institutional grant writing coaching groups as an approach to honing these skills, specific features that enhance or limit coaching group effectiveness have not been rigorously studied. Methods Qualitative inerviews were conducted with a subset of early-career investigators (n=204 and coaches (n=36) engaged in a national, U.S. based, group-randomized trial of grant writing coaching groups to test the effects of two variables on submission and funding of national-level proposals: (1) coaching duration (regular/extended dose) and (2) mode of engaging a scientific advisor (someone with content-aligned expertise) in the coaching process. This report focuses on interviews conducted upon completion of the regular coaching dose - 5 months of biweekly, group-based coaching sessions to support active proposal writing. Interviews were designed to identify which coaching group elements were perceived to be the most critical. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using deductive (participants) or open (coaches) coding to identify themes. Results Triangulation of results from participant and coach interviews showed strong concordance that coaches, peers, and scientific advisors all played key roles in supporting intervention efficacy. Sufficient alignment of scientific fields and/or methodologies among group members was important, although breadth of perspectives was also valued. Other critical group features were skilled and well-organized coaches, detailed feedback, peer-to-peer support (technical and psychosocial), and clear expectations for group functioning. Factors attenuating impact included variation in participants' engagement and "readiness to write," within-group mismatches of expertise or grant mechanisms, and limited research support at some participants' home institutions. Conclusion This study identified key elements of successful grant writing coaching groups and potential barriers to their effectiveness, while yielding insights about tailoring this approach for individuals at different stages of proposal development.

scientific communication and education↗