Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.08.15.670609

Defensive mutualisms affect plant and ant island biogeography at a global scale

Abstract

AimMutualism can shape biogeographic patterns at macroecological scales. Recently, Delavaux et al. (2024) found that plant mutualisms with mycorrhizae, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and animal pollinators limit island colonization, weakening the latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG) on oceanic islands. Here, we revisit their analysis and examine whether ants and plants engaged in a common defensive mutualism mediated by extrafloral nectaries (EFN) are similarly under-represented on oceanic islands, and whether this defensive ant-plant mutualism also weakens the LDG on islands. LocationGlobal. Time periodPresent-day species distributions and traits. Major taxa studiedVascular plants and ants. MethodsWe used global trait and occurrence databases to compare ant and plant species richness between oceanic islands and their likely source mainlands for taxa that do and do not interact mutualistically via EFNs. When analyzing the factors that determine whether a plant species occurs on oceanic islands, we also included the mutualism types studied by Delavaux et al. (2024), namely biotic pollination, mycorrhizal fungi, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and added plant habit, life history, and phylogeny as covariates. ResultsBoth plants with EFNs and EFN-visiting ants are significantly over-represented on islands. The species richness of EFN-visiting ants and EFN-bearing plants also positively covary across islands. In ants, engaging in mutualisms mediated by EFNs significantly strengthens, rather than weakens, the LDG on islands, while for plants, EFNs have no effect or strengthen the LDG on islands, depending on data filtering. After accounting for plant habit, life history, and phylogeny, only biotic pollination significantly limits plant colonization of islands, whereas mycorrhizae and nitrogen-fixing bacteria now have positive or non-significant effects, respectively, on island colonization. Main conclusionsEFNs facilitate rather than limit plant and ant colonization on islands. Mutualism does not ubiquitously limit island colonization, and some mutualism types strengthen rather than dampen the LDG on islands.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brown, D., Frederickson, M. E.. 2025-08-20. Defensive mutualisms affect plant and ant island biogeography at a global scale. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.15.670609

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

PlanktonLake-CEREEP- A Freshwater Plankton Image Dataset with Semi-Automated Label Cleaning

Plankton plays a fundamental role in aquatic ecosystems, influencing biogeochemical cycles and serving as a key food source for many organisms. Recent high-throughput imaging technologies enable the rapid acquisition of large volumes of microscopic images, creating new opportunities for monitoring planktonic ecosystems. However, the manual processing and annotation of the vast amounts of data generated by these devices remain time-consuming tasks. In this context, machine learning-based classification models offer a promising solution. In this data paper, we introduce a new labeled freshwater plankton dataset comprising approximately 88,000 images distributed across 43 taxa. We also present the labeling assistance method we used to facilitate dataset annotation. Finally, we present a baseline based on a convolutional neural network (CNN), which achieves a classification accuracy of 93% on our dataset.

ecology↗

A training protocol for human classification of Asian elephant images from trail cameras

Trail cameras have become ubiquitous tools for ecological data collection over recent decades. Despite progress in the development of automated algorithms and artificial intelligence for image classification, our ability to process large volumes of data remain limited by the need for trained human observers to make refined judgements. We provide guidance on placement of trail cameras for observing Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) and outline a protocol for training and testing naive human observers in performing image classifications (age/sex class and group composition) that cannot yet be automated. This process can be used to develop a high-throughput workflow capable of extracting useful data from large volumes of images. Our training material consisted of 14,007 images collected from 6 trail cameras around Udawalawe National Park in Sri Lanka from 2017-2019. In the first stage, expert observers (n=3) trained a group of inexperienced participants (n=4), who engaged in an iterative process to develop a protocol document. The document was then tested on a second set of subjects (n=6) each of whom classified 350 test images in four separate sequential batches using quantitative measures of precision and accuracy. The test set was sampled from 54,435 images from an additional 25 cameras. When compared to expert observers, they achieved a fair level of precision (Fleiss' kappa = 0.247) and 82.6% accuracy. Our approach can usefully be extended to other species and contexts.

ecology↗

Forest belowground productivity and carbon allocation predominantly driven by soil properties rather than climate

Forests are threatened by a multitude of stressors, including anthropogenic disturbances and climate change. Assessing how forests will respond to these stressors requires a comprehensive understanding of net primary productivity (Npp), environmental constraints on growth, and adaptive capacity. A parameter of significant uncertainty is belowground Npp (bNpp), which can account for up to 80% of total Npp but is poorly estimated and rarely measured directly. We used a cross-biome dataset of direct, field-based measurements of aboveground and belowground primary productivity and 21 climatic and soil variables to identify potential constraints on bNpp and belowground carbon allocation in boreal and cold temperate forests. Soil variables, rather than climate variables, were the main drivers of bNpp and belowground allocation across biomes. The importance of soil variables suggests that soil nutrient dynamics, especially soil nutrient pool and flux variables, must be explicitly modeled to more accurately predict feedbacks between climate, productivity, and within-tree carbon allocation. Within biomes, environmental drivers of belowground allocation varied between low versus high allocation forests, indicating that environmental drivers are site-specific and the development of within-biome, site-scale classifications for forest ecosystems could be useful. Changes in soil variables, such as increasing soil nitrogen pools, caused abrupt and large decreases in bNpp for boreal, but not cold temperate forests. Threshold-like shifts indicate that boreal forests might have lower adaptive capacity and higher sensitivity to disturbances than cold temperate forests. With 70% of boreal forests characterized by low bNpp, disturbances such as anthropogenic nitrogen deposition could cause large-scale decreases in bNpp that could push these forests beyond their adaptive capacity.

ecology↗