Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.28.666458

Superior batch alignment and hyper-dimensional cytometry representations allow ultra-sensitive classification of disease phenotypes

Abstract

Analysis of cytometry data predominantly relies on clustering and dimensionality reduction approaches for computational tractability. This is particularly relevant for modern spectral flow cytometers, which can simultaneously measure an increasingly large number of antibody marker channels. While dimensionality reduction provides for more efficient data processing, this comes at the expense of data loss that may miss subtle patterns among rare cell types that may be critical for disease detection. Maintaining analysis at full dimensions presents opportunities to preserve resolution and provides complete downstream data interpretability. However, a significant obstacle to analysis of cytometry data without dimensionality reduction is the significant batch effects observed in this data between experiment days, operators and equipment types. Here we show a new strategy to denoise batch variation from both flow- and mass-cytometry datasets using an autoencoder neural network architecture. We generated a benchmark flow cytometry dataset in mice to compare this approach to current toolsets and find our approach shows superior preservation of biological signals, whilst also performing batch correction equal to current best methodology. Our batch alignment approach works to such an extent that it becomes practically possible to project batch aligned data into multidimensional space to generate a novel representation of cellular phenotype for downstream model building. This hyperdimensional approach maintains original data resolution without requiring dimensionality reduction, and thus any resultant cell populations that differentiate phenotypes remain fully interpretable. We show with two large clinical datasets that our batch-alignment approach coupled with the multi-dimensional representation successfully detects meaningful patterns in cases where the original analysis methods struggled. This new framework removes some of the inherent technical limitations encountered in the integration of large, multi-batch cytometry datasets and provides a framework for machine learning model building from this modality. An implementation of this framework and an associated web application accompanies this manuscript at http://voxelcoder.cloud. Significance StatementThis work addresses a critical bottleneck in cytometry analysis by introducing a neural network-based approach that effectively removes technical batch variation while preserving biological signals. The novel hyperdimensional representation maintains full data resolution without dimensionality reduction, enabling more sensitive detection of disease-associated cellular signatures than current methods. Importantly, this framework enables reliable batch normalization of fresh samples processed at different times and locations, overcoming the practical constraints of clinical sample collection where simultaneous processing is often impossible. The enhanced sensitivity for identifying pathogenic cellular patterns has immediate implications for biomarker discovery and personalized medicine applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mashford, B. S., Hewitt, T., May, M., Zhuang, Z., Jain, A., Diamand, K. E., Li, F.-J., Kwong, K., Read, S. H., Davies, A. R., Hammill, D., Andrews, T. D.. 2025-07-31. Superior batch alignment and hyper-dimensional cytometry representations allow ultra-sensitive classification of disease phenotypes. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.28.666458

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Homogeneous network inference for subtype-stratified master regulator analysis in cancer

Master-regulator analysis of 34 TCGA tumour cohorts (cancer x molecular subtype; n between 27 and 562 tumours) requires one regulatory network per cohort. Mutual-information (MI) networks inferred with ARACNe3 are the usual choice, but they are not available for the smallest cohorts; filling the gap with correlation networks would mix two methods inside the very comparison between subtypes that the analysis is meant to make. We therefore infer every network with a single procedure, fixed-size Spearman regulons (FSR): rank correlation between regulator and target, a fixed effect-size threshold rho >= 0.2, the per-target data-processing-inequality (DPI) pruning implemented in corto, bootstrap support, and truncation to the 100 best-supported targets per regulator. We quantify what this choice concedes and what it provides, labelling each claim as a standard result, a heuristic, or an empirical result. Rank correlation is more powerful than the MI estimators we simulated for n < 200 but cannot see non-monotone dependence, which in a synthetic worst case costs at most about 0.05-0.10 of the master regulators recovered; the per-target DPI is a heuristic with a measurable disagreement rate with the MI-based one; and pairwise dependence is not direct interaction, for MI and correlation alike. Where both methods are feasible (n >= 95) they overlap in 0.7 of the top-20 regulators, the same as two filterings of the same ARACNe3 network, although the rank correlation of the full score vector shows a measurable method effect in the tail. Subsampling large real cohorts indicates that networks inferred from fewer than 60 tumours do not reliably reproduce their own cohort's master regulators, that 60-100 is a grey zone, and that a cancer-wide network does not rescue small subtypes. We present FSR as an adequate and uniform choice for multi-cohort analysis, not as a statistically superior one.

systems biology↗

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗

Calibrating developmental dynamics from single-cell atlases: lineage paths outrun least-action routes

Single-cell atlases infer developmental dynamics from destructive snapshots, yet how far realized lineage paths depart from such inferred dynamics has never been measured with controls. We introduce LADD (Least-Action Developmental Dynamics), a measurement framework that learns a stochastic developmental vector field from time-series single-cell RNA-seq and computes minimum-action and minimum-time paths, together with a three-layer calibration protocol that separates genuine path deviation from the generic cost of centroid measurement, and we compare its forecasting component with optimal-transport and flow-matching methods. In the lineage-resolved Caenorhabditis elegans atlas, the raw action ratio of observed lineage-centroid trajectories to optimal paths is 3.79, yet forward-simulated ensembles of the learned model itself score 2.07, leaving a genuine excess of about two-fold. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), the observed ratio sits entirely at the model's floor. Three mechanisms that could explain the residual deviation (detours, flow-opposition, and fate-map complexity) are each excluded; what remains is speed, with lineages moving 30-43% faster along the learned flow. We report validity boundaries for temporal resolution, cross-species comparison, and energetic interpretation, delimiting where action-based trajectory comparisons are meaningful.

systems biology↗