Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.24.666568

Centromeres in budding yeasts are conserved in chromosomal location but not in structure.

Abstract

The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has point centromeres, which are much smaller and simpler than centromeres of most other eukaryotes and have a defined DNA sequence. Other yeast taxa have different and highly diverse centromere structures, but a clear picture of how yeast centromeres have evolved is lacking. Here, we investigated nine yeast species in two taxonomic orders that are close outgroups to S. cerevisiae. We find that they have a wide diversity of centromere structures, indicating that multiple transitions of structure have occurred within the last 200 Myr. Some species have centromeres with defined sequence motifs (17 - 200 bp), others consist of Inverted Repeats (IRs), and others have Ty5-like retroelement clusters. Strikingly, the chromosomal locations of centromeres have largely been conserved across taxonomic orders, even as their structures have changed, which suggests that structure replacement occurs in situ. In some Barnettozyma species we find that a single genome can contain chromosomes with different centromere structures - some with IRs and some without - which suggests that a structural transition is underway in this genus. We identified only one example of a centromere moving by a long distance: a new centromere formed recently at the MAT locus of Barnettozyma californica, 250 kb from the previous centromere on that chromosome. Author summaryCentromeres are an evolutionary paradox. Their molecular function is highly conserved, but their structures vary tremendously among eukaryotes. The "point" centromeres of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are among the most unusual: they are tiny (< 200 bp) and non-repetitive, and unlike other centromeres they contain a single copy of a well-defined sequence motif. However, we have little knowledge about where these point centromeres came from, or more generally about how changes of centromere structure occur during evolution. Here, we characterized centromere structure and location in nine species of budding yeasts, spanning an evolutionary depth of approximately 200 million years. We find that the chromosomal locations of centromeres are extraordinarily well conserved, whereas their structures vary greatly. We show that sequence-defined centromeres are older and more widely distributed than previously realised. We identify some species in which the centromeres of different chromosomes have different structures, which suggests that they are in transition from one structure to another. The centromere variation observed makes it difficult to infer the ancestral structure.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hession, C., Byrne, K. P., Wolfe, K. H., Butler, G.. 2025-07-31. Centromeres in budding yeasts are conserved in chromosomal location but not in structure.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.24.666568

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

RELAX does not reproduce its own estimates at default settings, and its output does not show it

Selection-intensity estimates from RELAX are reported as a point value of K with a likelihood-ratio P. We report that, at default settings and on data of ordinary size, the program does not reproduce its own fits. Of 27 enzyme entries refitted under two optimiser configurations, none reproduced its log-likelihood to within 0.01 units; the median change was 103 units, the largest over 3,400, and four verdicts reversed. Eighty null orthologues reproduced none. A byte-identical command returned a distinct likelihood on every repetition, single-threaded, across three releases, and on alignments simulated under the fitted model, where 3.3 per cent of replicates reproduced. The documented random-number seed never reaches the generator when assigned on the command line, yet reads back as the value supplied. PAML localises the cause: its two-ratio model, without site classes, reproduced its log-likelihood for all 288 genes; its site-class models agreed for 27 to 67 per cent. The instability follows the mixture over sites, not the program. The output does not show it: 46 of 410 fits ended with a negative likelihood-ratio statistic, impossible under convergence, and 123 of 410 report a K re-estimated under a domain restriction rather than the unconstrained maximum. Of 234 published studies using RELAX, none reported a seed. Seeding while holding the thread count at one reproduced sixty of sixty runs on twenty genes under two releases; the seed alone reproduced none of five, and no documentation states the second condition. We recommend that fits be repeated and their dispersion published.

evolutionary biology↗

Sequential accumulation of adaptive alleles forms an inversion supergene in deer mice

Supergenes are clusters of co-inherited loci that affect multiple or complex phenotypes. Despite the growing number of chromosomal inversions identified as supergenes in natural populations, their molecular basis and evolutionary history often remain obscure. Here, we identified two candidate genes, Slc45a2 and Npr3, within a 41-Mb inversion supergene in the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) that respectively drive darker coats and longer tails - two traits associated with forest adaptation. Mice homozygous for the inversion (inv/inv) exhibit elevated Slc45a2 expression in melanocytes relative to the congenic standard genotype (std/std), disrupting pheomelanin production. In parallel, downregulation of Npr3 in inv/inv mouse growth plates prolongs postnatal growth of caudal vertebrae, resulting in tail elongation. Population-level analyses further implicate that this supergene arose through the subsequent accumulation of the Npr3 allele within the inversion, rather than by capturing all beneficial mutations at its origin.

evolutionary biology↗

Toxin structure shapes palatability in a chemically defended butterfly

The toxicity of chemical defences is well studied, but the potential contribution of compound structure to predator deterrence remains largely unexplored. Whether predation acts more strongly on toxicity or unpalatability remains largely untested, partly because few systems allow toxin structure to vary independently of quantity. Heliconius sara larvae provide such a system: those reared on Passiflora auriculata sequester cyclopentenyl cyanogenic glucosides (CGs), while those reared on P. biflora biosynthesise comparable quantities of aliphatic CGs. Using two invertebrate predators, Camponotus floridanus ants and Hierodula membranacea mantids, we tested whether this structural difference affects palatability independent of toxicity. Mantids rejected larvae with cyclopentenyl CGs more often than larvae with aliphatic CGs, despite no detectable difference in total CG content. This pattern was mirrored in extract-based assays with ants, independently of cyanide release: extracts with cyclopentenyl CGs remained deterrent, while extracts with aliphatic CGs did not differ in deterrence from water. Live larvae, by contrast, elicited similar responses from ants regardless of CG structure. These results show that variation in toxin structure can strongly affect palatability, with some compounds conferring greater protection than others. This demonstrates the importance of chemical structural diversity in the evolution of chemical defences.

evolutionary biology↗