Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.23.666409

Spatial Dynamics in the Yeast Galactose Switch Revealed Through RDME-ODE Hybrid 4D Simulations

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells are spatially organized into functionally-distinct compartments. This three-dimensional(3D) organization generates intracellular heterogeneities that can modulate regulatory dynamics. Despite this knowledge of subcellular organization, most quantitative gene-regulation models still assume a well-mixed environment in which molecules can react regardless of their spatial positions. Here, we use the well-established galactose switch in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) to develop spatially-resolved models that integrate experimentally-derived intracellular architectures, including chromosome organization, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and spatially distinct ribosome populations. We implement a hybrid stochastic-deterministic framework in which gene expression is modeled using a reaction-diffusion master equation that enforces locality (i.e., reactions occur only when molecules are in physical proximity), while metabolic and transport processes are captured by ordinary differential equations. Guided by electron microscopy and biochemical constraints, we quantify how accounting for intracellular spatial organization alters regulatory predictions in the galactose switch. We show that chromosome geometry has little effect on Gal2p output, whereas ER-associated translation reduces Gal2p delivery to the plasma membrane; the largest decrease of Gal2p abundance occurs when translation of GAL2 mRNA is restricted to a population of ribosomes physically bound to the ER. Together, these results demonstrate that more realistic 3D cellular architectures and local reaction rules can qualitatively change regulatory predictions, motivating integration of intracellular organization in future whole-cell models. Author SummaryEukaryotic cells are highly organized spaces with distinct subcellular compartments and heterogeneous distributions of molecules which influence how cells function. Yet, most computational models of gene regulation assume a spatially homogeneous intracellular environment. To quantify how intracellular architecture influences regulatory predictions, we developed spatially resolved models of the galactose switch in budding yeast, a well-characterized gene regulatory system controlling the response to extracellular galactose. We compared conventional well-stirred simulations with models that explicitly incorporate experimentally informed intracellular organization, including chromosome positioning, endoplasmic reticulum geometry, and functionally distinct ribosome populations. Incorporating these spatial features substantially altered the dynamics of predicted gene activity, protein production, and intracellular sugar levels. Our results demonstrate that the three-dimensional organization of eukaryotic cells can significantly change regulatory outcomes of computational models, underscoring the need for integrating realistic spatial architectures in future models of eukaryotic gene regulation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wu, T., Spindler, M.-C., Earnest, E., Li, H., Thornburg, Z. R., Mahamid, J., Luthey-Shculten, Z.. 2025-07-28. Spatial Dynamics in the Yeast Galactose Switch Revealed Through RDME-ODE Hybrid 4D Simulations. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.23.666409

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Parsimonious Creatures: Building Gene Regulatory Networks Robust to Somatic Evolution

For early multicellular life to have formed and maintained cellular organization, preventing loss of controlled cell replication due to somatic evolution was of critical importance, and remains important to this day for control of cancer. We study how gene regulatory networks (GRNs) can be designed to slow the divergence of somatic clonal lineages in the context of early multicellular life. We model the mutation of GRNs within simplified 12-celled organisms we term "parsimonious creatures", who must replicate from a single cell to 12 cells and then prevent replication past 12 cells to maximize fitness. We found two minimal motifs can achieve these goals, but both are prone to breakdown through somatic evolution: The feedforward motif, which is loosely regulating but relatively robust, and the simple step motif, which uses strong interactions and feedback to form memoryless ultrasensitivity, but is fragile. These simple motifs may be duplicated to form redundant networks via one of two structures: averaging redundancy, which averages multiple sources of information, and min redundancy, which adopts the most conservative source. Averaging redundancy uniformly slows somatic evolution, while min redundancy stalls somatic evolution until neutral mutations accumulate. Either may be superior dependent on life history. However, averaging redundancy slowly increases fitness as the network becomes larger, but large min redundancy networks eventually become "paralyzed", increasing the probability of senescence and reducing fitness. These GRN designs are idealized, yet provide imperfect solutions with fundamental tradeoffs, offering insight as to why somatic evolution remains an incompletely solved problem for multicellular life.

systems biology↗

Homogeneous network inference for subtype-stratified master regulator analysis in cancer

Master-regulator analysis of 34 TCGA tumour cohorts (cancer x molecular subtype; n between 27 and 562 tumours) requires one regulatory network per cohort. Mutual-information (MI) networks inferred with ARACNe3 are the usual choice, but they are not available for the smallest cohorts; filling the gap with correlation networks would mix two methods inside the very comparison between subtypes that the analysis is meant to make. We therefore infer every network with a single procedure, fixed-size Spearman regulons (FSR): rank correlation between regulator and target, a fixed effect-size threshold rho >= 0.2, the per-target data-processing-inequality (DPI) pruning implemented in corto, bootstrap support, and truncation to the 100 best-supported targets per regulator. We quantify what this choice concedes and what it provides, labelling each claim as a standard result, a heuristic, or an empirical result. Rank correlation is more powerful than the MI estimators we simulated for n < 200 but cannot see non-monotone dependence, which in a synthetic worst case costs at most about 0.05-0.10 of the master regulators recovered; the per-target DPI is a heuristic with a measurable disagreement rate with the MI-based one; and pairwise dependence is not direct interaction, for MI and correlation alike. Where both methods are feasible (n >= 95) they overlap in 0.7 of the top-20 regulators, the same as two filterings of the same ARACNe3 network, although the rank correlation of the full score vector shows a measurable method effect in the tail. Subsampling large real cohorts indicates that networks inferred from fewer than 60 tumours do not reliably reproduce their own cohort's master regulators, that 60-100 is a grey zone, and that a cancer-wide network does not rescue small subtypes. We present FSR as an adequate and uniform choice for multi-cohort analysis, not as a statistically superior one.

systems biology↗

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗