Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.08.663604

Light stimulation system for measuring pupillary light responses based on Maxwellian view optical system using a retina presentation type viewfinder

Abstract

BackgroundMelanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGC) contribute predominantly to non-image-forming effects of light, such as light-induced circadian phase shift, melatonin suppression, and pupillary light reflex. Post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) has been well-used for the evaluation of ipRGC sensitivity for humans since it is able to detect ipRGC function independently from conventional cones. However, pharmacological mydriasis or a specialized light stimulation system, such as the Maxwellian view (MV) optical system, is required to avoid dynamic pupil constriction in the stimulated eye for effective PIPR measurements, which makes these approaches less practical and difficult to implement in standard experimental settings. In this context, we propose the application of a retinal projection viewfinder based on the MV system as a practical approach for measuring PIPR, and evaluate the feasibility of this approach by comparing its performance with a typical LED-based optical system. MethodsTwenty-two healthy participants underwent pupillometry using both the MV-based viewfinder and a typical LED-based system. Monochromatic red and blue light stimuli were presented for durations of 1 and 10 seconds. Pupil responses, including maximum constriction, PIPR amplitude after 6 seconds from the light offset, area under the curve (AUC) values of PIPR, and sustained slopes, were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model to assess the differences between the two systems. ResultsThe MV-based viewfinder significantly enhanced net PIPR amplitude (p < 0.05) and sustained slope (p < 0.01) during 10-second light stimulation compared to the LED system, demonstrating its capability to effectively measure ipRGC-driven responses. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in the net AUC values. These results highlight that the MV-based viewfinder enables effective PIPR measurements by delivering constant and controlled light stimulation directly to the retina, minimizing the effects of dynamic pupil constriction during light stimulation. ConclusionsThe MV-based viewfinder showed feasibility as an effective method for measuring PIPR without requiring pharmacological dilation or complex optical instrumentation. This approach has strong potential for advancing the assessment of human ipRGC function using pupillary responses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eto, T., Yoshiike, T., Utsumi, T., Kawamura, A., Nagao, K., Kuriyama, K., Kitamura, S.. 2025-07-11. Light stimulation system for measuring pupillary light responses based on Maxwellian view optical system using a retina presentation type viewfinder. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.08.663604

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A Mechanistic Account of Dedifferentiation in the Aging Visual System

To uncover the mechanisms of age-related dedifferentiation, we simulated neural degradation in a computational model of the ventral visual stream. Severing connections or adding noise, whether in inferotemporal cortex (IT) or upstream, reduced IT differentiation, indicating that dedifferentiation need not originate locally. Degrading peripheral V1, which preferentially drove place-selective IT neurons, selectively reduced place differentiation, a candidate mechanism for the stronger place dedifferentiation reported in aging.

neuroscience↗

Reusing pipettes in Patch-seq: a foundation for automated multimodal profiling

Patch-seq is a technique for single-cell multimodal characterization. It combines whole-cell electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, and morphological reconstruction in single neurons. Patch-seq morphologies are a critical bridge among cell types, genes, physiology, and large-scale connectivity platforms such as EM connectomes and single-cell-resolution projectomes. However, patch-seq experimental complexity and operator dependence limit throughput. Automation could enable scalable Patch-seq but requires procedural adaptations, including detergent-based pipette cleaning, robotic nucleus extraction and collection. The impact of these automations on Patch-seq quality has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we show that each of these modifications preserves or improves key Patch-seq outcomes. Automated nucleus extraction performs comparably to, or better than, expert manual operation, preserving key RNA and morphological metrics. Detergent-cleaned, reused pipettes supported a viable sealing success rate across multiple cleaning cycles and preserved electrophysiological quality and transcriptomic yield without introducing excess contamination. Sonication effectively allows collection of nuclear material without damaging RNA and supports subsequent pipette cleaning and reuse. Enhanced automated sealing and break-in procedures increased throughput regardless of brain region, cell type or species. Together, these results validate the core procedural adaptations required for automated Patch-seq and establish a foundation for high-throughput, standardized multimodal single-cell characterization.

neuroscience↗

Development of direction selectivity in the Xenopus tadpole optic tectum and midbrain tegmentum

Detecting motion direction is a fundamental function performed by direction selective (DS) neurons. DS neurons in the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) enable the tracking of moving objects. DS neurons of the accessory optic system support reflexive eye / head movements that stabilize gaze during self-motion. By developmental stage 48 (10 days postfertilization), Xenopus tadpoles display visually guided behaviors that require both types of DS neurons. Our previous work has shown that these two regions are not only functionally distinct but also follow different developmental programs. Here we characterized and compared how direction selectivity develops in both visual processing centers. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings during moving bar visual stimulation, we measured DS synaptic inputs and spiking outputs in both regions across three key developmental stages of the retinotectal projection. Tegmental neurons were direction selective ab initio, and both input and output tuning remained stable across development. Tectal neurons were observed to receive DS inputs early, and their input selectivity also remained stable across development. However, their spiking output grew substantially more DS at the later developmental stage. This was due at least in part to a naturally occurring decrease in intrinsic excitability which preferentially dampened overall spike rates, but especially in response to the non-preferred direction of motion, thereby increasing direction selectivity. These results reveal distinct developmental trajectories in parallel visual pathways. Tegmental direction selectivity is established early and stays stable, whereas tectal output tuning sharpens during development through a decrease in intrinsic excitability.

neuroscience↗