Attention robustly dissociates objective performance and subjective visibility reports

Abstract

Visual experience can sometimes depart from visual performance, providing a powerful lens into the mechanisms generating conscious perception. In one proposed dissociation--subjective inflation--unattended locations in the periphery appear stronger than attended ones despite equated performance. Subjective inflation has played a central role in motivating theories of consciousness that reject the sufficiency of sensory signals for conscious perception. Yet the empirical basis for subjective inflation is limited. Here, in a large-scale adversarial collaboration, we conducted four simultaneously-replicated experiments testing the strength, character, and extent of subjective inflation under inattention. We used a new analytic approach to quantify inattentional inflation over full psychometric functions, beyond single matched-performance levels. We found robust inattentional inflation for contrast-dependent and texture-based perception, at and above the visual threshold. However at suprathreshold, we found inattentional inflation for the overall stimulus but not the specific feature relevant for performance. Finally, we establish the unifying principle that inattentional inflation occurs if and only if attention reduces performance thresholds more than visibility thresholds. Thus what we think we see may regularly exceed what we can visually discriminate, placing constraints on theories of conscious perception.