Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.02.662726

A stress-NRF2 response axis polarises tumor macrophages and undermines immunotherapy

Schaer, D. J.·Schulthess-Lutz, N.·Baselgia, L.·Kunasingam, K.·Humar, R.·Hansen, K.·Vallelian, F.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) can switch between immune-activating and cancer-promoting states; yet, the stress pathways that lock them into pro-cancerous states remain obscure. In MC38 colon tumors, repeated anti-CD40 or radiotherapy created necrosis that split TAMs into peripheral Cxcl9+ and peri-necrotic Spp1+ subsets. Spatial transcriptomics, single-cell RNA-seq, and Keap1-deficient mice showed that the latter are NRF2high "stress-TAMs", with immunosuppressive and tumor-promoting activity. The same NRF2 activation gradient separates pro-inflammatory CXCL9+ and anti-inflammatory SPP1+ TAMs across diverse human cancers. NRF2high TAMs silence IFN-STAT1 programmes, lose MHC-II and chemokine expression, fail to expand T cells, drive tumor cell invasion in 3D co-cultures, and foster metastasis. Constitutive hematopoietic NRF2 activation accelerated the growth of therapy-naive MMTV-PyMT breast tumors and markedly impaired anti-CD40 efficacy in MC38 subcutaneous and lung-metastasis models. Conversely, macrophage-specific Nrf2 deletion restored immunogenic TAMs and potentiated anti-CD40 and anti-PD-1 treatments. Thus, NRF2 constitutes a stress-response axis that fixes TAMs in a pro-cancer, therapy-resistant state; inhibiting it could revive the macrophage-T-cell amplification loop and broaden immunotherapy responses. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=139 SRC="FIGDIR/small/662726v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (63K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@728b03org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4a473org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c8a209org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@60681_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

immunologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Schaer, D. J., Schulthess-Lutz, N., Baselgia, L., Kunasingam, K., Humar, R., Hansen, K., Vallelian, F.. 2025-07-07. A stress-NRF2 response axis polarises tumor macrophages and undermines immunotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.02.662726

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Common viral infections seed regionally distinct resident memory T cells in the human CNS

T cells persist in the central nervous system (CNS) and can drive both protection and neurological disease. How these cells are organized in humans and what they recognize is largely unknown. Here, we profiled CD8 T cells across anatomically distinct CNS regions, obtained through on-site autopsies and temporal lobe resection surgeries, using single-cell RNA sequencing, paired T cell receptor sequencing, and DNA-barcoded tetramers. Resident memory T cells (TRM) specific for Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2 were identified across CNS compartments. Anatomical location was the strongest correlate of TRM cell state, with leptomeningeal cells adopting a cytokine-poised TRM program, whereas brain TRM cells were transcriptionally restrained. Cells of the same clonotype spanned tissues yet adopted local transcriptional states. Viral specificity added another layer of TRM heterogeneity with GZMK/GZMA-expressing EBV-specific populations and interferon-stimulated gene signatures in SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A-specific cells. The human CNS thus harbors regionally distinct CD8+ TRM shaped by common viral exposures.

immunology↗
bioRxiv2026

A regulatory T cell signature provides a shared molecular basis for the therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatic disease

Rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and osteoarthritis (OA), show distinct phenotypes yet respond to overlapping therapies, implicating shared immune mechanisms. In the Transimmunom cohort, we profiled peripheral blood from 240 individuals (47 healthy, 44 OA, 91 RA, 58 SpA) across deep immunophenotyping, immunoproteomics and Treg-Teff transcriptomics. Single-layer analyses revealed broader Treg than Teff remodeling, along with a shared pattern of reduced activated Tregs and expanded Helios+ Tregs across all diseases, alongside a decrease in functional Treg subpopulations, including CTLA4+ and CD45RA- Tregs. In RA specifically, LAG3+ Tregs were also expanded. Combining omics layers outperformed single-layer approaches for disease classification. Among individual layers, Treg transcriptomes were most discriminative, and integration uncovered disease-specific programs. Unsupervised clustering identified a cross-disease cluster independent of activity, treatment and age, mapping to early disease (<= years) and dominated by a Treg dysfunction-associated program. These results provide a biological rationale for the therapeutic "window of opportunity" concept and duration-stratified Treg-directed trials.

immunology↗
bioRxiv2026

Inhibitory Fc Receptor sets a time limit on macrophage response to IgG

Antibodies engage both activating Fc Receptors and the inhibitory receptor Fc{gamma}RIIB. Why macrophages need a dedicated inhibitory receptor rather than simply tuning activating receptor signaling is unclear. Using DNA-based chimeric receptors and in silico modeling, we independently controlled activating and inhibitory Fc Receptors. We found that Fc{gamma}RIIB imposed a time limit on macrophage phagocytosis and ERK signaling. The time limit is due to activating Fc Receptors converting PI(4,5)P2 to PI(3,4,5)P3, which is subsequently converted to PI(3,4)P2 by Fc{gamma}RIIB. This leads to a pulse of active signaling, which is sufficient for phagocytosis of small bacteria-sized targets but not phagocytosis of large targets and TNF secretion. Unlike engaging Fc{gamma}RIIB, reducing activating Fc Receptor signaling decreased initiation of phagocytosis, the speed of PI(3,4,5)P3 generation, and the amplitude of ERK signaling. Our results demonstrate that Fc{gamma}RIIB controls the duration of IgG signaling, while the activating Fc Receptors control sensitivity.

immunology↗