Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.05.14.654005

Cell-type-specific synaptic scaling mechanisms differentially contribute to associative learning

Abstract

Excitatory synaptic scaling regulates network dynamics by proportionally adjusting excitatory synaptic strengths after sensory perturbations. During associative learning, blocking excitatory scaling in conditioned taste aversion paradigms prolongs generalized aversive responses and delays memory specificity. Recent evidence also implicates inhibitory synaptic scaling in the regulation of network dynamics. Specifically, parvalbumin (PV)-expressing inhibitory neurons, targeting perisomatic regions of excitatory (E) pyramidal neurons, and somatostatin (SST)-expressing neurons, targeting distal dendrites, exhibit distinct scaling responses. This leaves open the question of how complex plasticity mechanisms regulate recurrent excitatory-inhibitory circuit dynamics in associative learning. Using computational approaches, we demonstrate that Hebbian plasticity drives memory generalization to novel stimuli not presented during conditioning. Following conditioning, diverse synaptic scaling mechanisms progressively induce memory specificity, which can be regulated by top-down inputs. Our results reveal that, in the absence of excitatory scaling, PV-to-E scaling can effectively compensate and rescue memory specificity, highlighting the presence of degenerate mechanisms in the brain. Notably, in the process of establishing memory specificity, excitatory scaling and PV-to-E scaling function synergistically, while concurrently opposing SST-to-E scaling. The synergistic and antagonistic plasticity mechanisms are orchestrated to shape the temporal evolution of memory representations, from generalized to precise. Significance statementAssociative learning is a fundamental brain function that allows us to link experiences, adapt behavior, and form lasting memories. During this process, memory representations are shaped by synaptic scaling, a homeostatic plasticity mechanism that provides slow, negative feedback to regulate synaptic strengths and adjust network excitability. Operating at the synapses of diverse excitatory and inhibitory cell types, multiple forms of homeostatic plasticity influence the dynamics of associative learning. Here, we demonstrate that synergistic and antagonistic cell-type-specific synaptic scaling mechanisms operate at different types of inhibitory synapses to jointly govern the temporal evolution of memory representations. Through their interaction, they guide the transition from generalized to precise memories.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Veneto, F., Kepce, A., Wu, Y. K., Gjorgjieva, J.. 2025-05-14. Cell-type-specific synaptic scaling mechanisms differentially contribute to associative learning. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.14.654005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗