Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.03.24.645024

Ser14-phosphorylated Rpn6 Limits Proteostasis Impairment and Pathology in Both Brain and Heart of Tauopathy Mice

Ejaz, S.·Sternburg, J. O.·Rezvani, K.·Ahammed, M. S.·Giri, S.·Liu, J.·Wang, H.·Wang, X.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Alzheimers disease (AD) patients often display neurobehavioral and cardiac impairments, but the underlying factors remain unclear. Ser14 phosphorylation in RPN6 (p-S14-RPN6) mediates the activation of 26S proteasomes by protein kinase A (PKA). Proteasome priming is implicated in protection by cAMP-PKA against AD, but this remains to be established. Hence, this study was conducted to interrogate homeostatic p-S14-RPN6 in AD. The recently validated Rpn6S14A knock-in (S14A) mice were crossbred with the PS19 tauopathy mice (RRID: IMSR_JAX:008169). The resultant wild type (WT), PS19, and PS19::S14A littermates were compared. Expedited declines in cognitive and motor functions as indicated respectively by significant decreases in object recognition and discrimination indexes and rotarod time were observed in PS19::S14A mice vs. PS19 mice, which is associated with more pronounced synaptic losses, microglial activation, and gliosis in the hippocampus. Compared with WT and PS19 mice, PS19::S14A mice showed exacerbated cardiac malfunction, cardiac hypertrophic responses and fibrosis, and greater increases of total and hyperphosphorylated tau proteins and ubiquitin conjugates in both hippocampi and hearts. These findings demonstrate that genetic blockade of p-S14-RPN6 exacerbates tauopathy in both the brain and heart, which for the first time establishes that homeostatic p-S14-RPN6 promotes proteostasis and protects against pathogenesis in AD.

Explore related subjects

cell biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ejaz, S., Sternburg, J. O., Rezvani, K., Ahammed, M. S., Giri, S., Liu, J., Wang, H., Wang, X.. 2025-03-25. Ser14-phosphorylated Rpn6 Limits Proteostasis Impairment and Pathology in Both Brain and Heart of Tauopathy Mice. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Differential requirement for the Ire1 luminal domain in Candida albicans drug susceptibility and pathogenicity

The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans depends on the unfolded protein response (UPR) for cell wall integrity, antifungal tolerance, filamentous growth, and virulence. The UPR is driven by the conserved transmembrane sensor Ire1, which is activated either by misfolded proteins through its luminal domain or by lipid bilayer stress (LBS) through its transmembrane domain. In budding yeast, these two activation modes deploy divergent transcriptional programs. Whether the requirement for these two input domains is separable in C. albicans, where the cell membrane and cell wall are themselves the targets of major antifungal drug classes, remains unknown. Here, we engineered a C. albicans strain expressing Ire1 lacking an intact luminal domain (ire1{Delta}LD), which no longer detects proteotoxic stress. The ire1{Delta}LD strain grew in the presence of the azole antifungals fluconazole and miconazole but was highly sensitive to heat shock, cell wall stress, and the echinocandin caspofungin. It was also unable to sustain filamentous growth and showed reduced virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RNA sequencing revealed only modest changes to the steady-state transcriptome of ire1{Delta}LD cells. Together, these findings define a differential requirement for the input domains of C. albicans Ire1, uncoupling growth under azole-induced membrane stress from the cell wall, thermal, and virulence-associated outputs that depend on proteotoxic sensing, a distinction that could inform antifungal strategies targeting the UPR.

cell biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Nucleosome Core Allostery Governs Chromatin Recognition and Cell Fate

Nucleosomes regulate chromatin folding, accessibility, and factor recruitment. Current models primarily attribute these functions to histone tail modifications, while the core is largely viewed as a structural scaffold. Yet subtle changes within the nucleosome core can produce profound functional consequences, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we describe nucleosome core allostery as a fundamental principle of chromatin regulation that amplifies the impact of minimal nucleosome variations. Leveraging natural differences between H2A.Z variants, we show that the nucleosome core encodes distinct conformational dynamics that propagate allosterically, thereby controlling nucleosome accessibility and recognition by chromatin factors. As a result, a single buried amino acid substitution alone is sufficient to reprogram nucleosome dynamics and bias cell identity. Our findings establish the nucleosome core as an allosteric regulatory module and provide a generalizable framework for how subtle variation within nucleosomes is amplified into diverse biological outcomes in development and disease.

cell biology↗
bioRxiv2026

YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics coordinate progenitor expansion and differentiation commitment

Progenitor cells must proliferate to expand the cell population, yet terminal differentiation requires this proliferative state to end. How signaling controls the duration of this proliferative window remains poorly understood. Using adipogenesis and live single-cell imaging of differentiation, cell-cycle, and ERK-activity reporters, we show that YAP and TAZ coordinate progenitor expansion with differentiation commitment by regulating ERK dynamics. YAP/TAZ maintain cells in a fluctuating high-ERK state that promotes proliferation while actively keeping the differentiation driver PPARG below the threshold for irreversible commitment. Crucially, this differentiation block is not explained by proliferation alone: inhibiting CDK4/6 or AKT suppressed proliferation without restoring differentiation, whereas MEK-ERK inhibition restored differentiation even when YAP/TAZ activity remained high. As YAP/TAZ activity decreases, dampened ERK fluctuations trigger PPARG activation. These findings support a self-limiting model in which YAP/TAZ-driven progenitor expansion progressively increases cell density and contact-dependent Hippo signaling, reducing YAP/TAZ activity and terminating the proliferative phase. Consequently, transient YAP/TAZ activation expands the progenitor pool while preserving subsequent differentiation, whereas sustained activation suppresses commitment. Together, these findings identify YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics as the nexus coordinating progenitor expansion with terminal differentiation and suggest that slower density-dependent Hippo feedback may set the duration of this proliferative window to regulate differentiated cell-number output.

cell biology↗