Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.02.28.640836

Mate choice against gene drives leads to evolutionary rescue

Abstract

Artificial gene drives offer a promising approach for controlling populations of agricultural pests, invasive species and disease vectors, such as malaria-carrying mosquitoes. Gene-drive alleles induce a transmission bias, meaning there is a greater than 50% probability that they will be inherited by offspring, facilitating their rapid propagation through populations. When these alleles induce high fitness costs, their spread can lead to the eradication of target populations. While gene drives hold great potential, there are various barriers that can hinder their effectiveness. One such barrier, precopulatory mate choice, has been suggested to impact the spread of gene drives, yet it remains underexplored. Here, we use individual-based simulations to investigate the spread of gene drives while allowing female mating preferences to evolve. In our model, gene-drive alleles exhibit transmission bias but also incur survival costs. Crucially, females are assumed to be able to distinguish between drive carriers and wild-type males based on drive-associated phenotypic differences. Consequently, females can evolve to prefer wild- type or drive-carrying males as mates. Our simulations show that under certain parameter settings, mating preferences against drive carriers can evolve during the spread of a gene drive. This can result in the eradication of the drive alleles and the evolutionary rescue of the population. The impact of mate choice was most pronounced when the gene drive spread relatively slowly, as this allowed more time for preferences against drives to evolve. In addition, evolutionary rescue occurred less frequently for recessive drives than for dominant ones. Our results demonstrate that mate choice can indeed impair the effectives of gene drive as a mechanism of population control and should therefore be seen as a potential risk. We further consider the implications for scientists developing gene drives as a population control technology. Lay summaryMost genes exist in multiple versions called alleles, with each having a 50% chance of being passed on by parents during sexual reproduction. However, some alleles, known as gene drives, manipulate inheritance to spread more widely across populations, even if they reduce the fitness of individuals carrying them. Gene drives occur naturally but can also be engineered in the laboratory. Recent technological advancements have led scientists to explore gene drives as a promising tool for controlling pests, invasive species, and disease vectors like malaria-carrying mosquitoes. However, before releasing any gene drives into the wild, it is crucial to assess their feasibility and potential risks. Here, we used computer simulations to explore how artificial gene drives spread when mate choice is allowed to evolve, assuming females can differentiate between males carrying gene drives and those without them. While gene drives have a transmission advantage, they also reduce the survival of carriers. Our results show that evolution can act rapidly after a gene drive is released. Females evolve to discriminate against drive-carrying males, which can sometimes result in the eradication of the gene drive. When gene drives have high survival costs, this evolutionary response can prevent population extinction, potentially undermining the drives purpose. The impact of mate choice is greatest when gene drives spread slowly, giving more time for evolution to act. These findings highlight the importance of considering mate choice dynamics when developing gene drives for population control.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Almeida, M. D., Henshaw, J. M., Jones, A. G., Long, X.. 2025-03-06. Mate choice against gene drives leads to evolutionary rescue. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.28.640836

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

RELAX does not reproduce its own estimates at default settings, and its output does not show it

Selection-intensity estimates from RELAX are reported as a point value of K with a likelihood-ratio P. We report that, at default settings and on data of ordinary size, the program does not reproduce its own fits. Of 27 enzyme entries refitted under two optimiser configurations, none reproduced its log-likelihood to within 0.01 units; the median change was 103 units, the largest over 3,400, and four verdicts reversed. Eighty null orthologues reproduced none. A byte-identical command returned a distinct likelihood on every repetition, single-threaded, across three releases, and on alignments simulated under the fitted model, where 3.3 per cent of replicates reproduced. The documented random-number seed never reaches the generator when assigned on the command line, yet reads back as the value supplied. PAML localises the cause: its two-ratio model, without site classes, reproduced its log-likelihood for all 288 genes; its site-class models agreed for 27 to 67 per cent. The instability follows the mixture over sites, not the program. The output does not show it: 46 of 410 fits ended with a negative likelihood-ratio statistic, impossible under convergence, and 123 of 410 report a K re-estimated under a domain restriction rather than the unconstrained maximum. Of 234 published studies using RELAX, none reported a seed. Seeding while holding the thread count at one reproduced sixty of sixty runs on twenty genes under two releases; the seed alone reproduced none of five, and no documentation states the second condition. We recommend that fits be repeated and their dispersion published.

evolutionary biology↗

Sequential accumulation of adaptive alleles forms an inversion supergene in deer mice

Supergenes are clusters of co-inherited loci that affect multiple or complex phenotypes. Despite the growing number of chromosomal inversions identified as supergenes in natural populations, their molecular basis and evolutionary history often remain obscure. Here, we identified two candidate genes, Slc45a2 and Npr3, within a 41-Mb inversion supergene in the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) that respectively drive darker coats and longer tails - two traits associated with forest adaptation. Mice homozygous for the inversion (inv/inv) exhibit elevated Slc45a2 expression in melanocytes relative to the congenic standard genotype (std/std), disrupting pheomelanin production. In parallel, downregulation of Npr3 in inv/inv mouse growth plates prolongs postnatal growth of caudal vertebrae, resulting in tail elongation. Population-level analyses further implicate that this supergene arose through the subsequent accumulation of the Npr3 allele within the inversion, rather than by capturing all beneficial mutations at its origin.

evolutionary biology↗

Toxin structure shapes palatability in a chemically defended butterfly

The toxicity of chemical defences is well studied, but the potential contribution of compound structure to predator deterrence remains largely unexplored. Whether predation acts more strongly on toxicity or unpalatability remains largely untested, partly because few systems allow toxin structure to vary independently of quantity. Heliconius sara larvae provide such a system: those reared on Passiflora auriculata sequester cyclopentenyl cyanogenic glucosides (CGs), while those reared on P. biflora biosynthesise comparable quantities of aliphatic CGs. Using two invertebrate predators, Camponotus floridanus ants and Hierodula membranacea mantids, we tested whether this structural difference affects palatability independent of toxicity. Mantids rejected larvae with cyclopentenyl CGs more often than larvae with aliphatic CGs, despite no detectable difference in total CG content. This pattern was mirrored in extract-based assays with ants, independently of cyanide release: extracts with cyclopentenyl CGs remained deterrent, while extracts with aliphatic CGs did not differ in deterrence from water. Live larvae, by contrast, elicited similar responses from ants regardless of CG structure. These results show that variation in toxin structure can strongly affect palatability, with some compounds conferring greater protection than others. This demonstrates the importance of chemical structural diversity in the evolution of chemical defences.

evolutionary biology↗