Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.02.24.639824

Interactive electrical behaviour in mormyrid weakly electric fish: Jamming avoidance response or social interaction?

Abstract

Weakly electric fish emit electric organ discharges (EODs) for both active electrolocation and electrocommunication. In African mormyrids, pulse-type EODs are produced at highly variable inter-discharge intervals (IDIs), forming sequences that can convey contextual and behavioural information to conspecifics. Neighbouring fish frequently engage in time-locked interactive behaviours, such as fixed-latency echo responses and EOD synchronisation. These behaviours have been proposed to function either as a jamming avoidance response (JAR), preventing simultaneous discharges and interference with electrolocation, or as a form of social signal. To test these hypotheses, we analysed interactions between pairs of Mormyrus rume proboscirostris, quantifying EOD synchronisations, echo events, and instances of jamming. Our results show that jamming is rare in this species. We found no correlation between jamming frequency and echoing behaviour, nor evidence that synchronisation and echo events are direct responses to recent jams. Instead, these interactive behaviours were associated with specific movement patterns and social contexts. Synchronisations were mainly initiated by stationary hovering individuals, while echo responses were more frequent in smaller fish actively following a social partner, suggesting a role in leader-follower dynamics. Pairs with more frequent echoing also exhibited reduced inter-individual distances, indicating that interactive electrical signalling promotes social cohesion. Rather than mitigating jamming, interactive electrical behaviours in mormyrids likely serve as communicative strategies to maintain group coherence or allocate social attention. These findings highlight the role of electrocommunication in structuring social interactions. Investigating the rules of these behaviours could eventually decipher which specific IDI patterns signal social intent and help to understand the underlying mechanisms of electrocommunication. HighlightsO_LIMormyrid fish frequently perform interactive signalling during electrocommunication. C_LIO_LIInteractive electrical signalling is associated with specific locomotor behaviours. C_LIO_LIEcho responses and signal synchronisations are not linked to jamming. C_LIO_LISignal synchronisations may support mutual assessment upon encounters. C_LIO_LIInteractive signalling promotes social cohesion and leader-follower dynamics. C_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Weimar, N., Maxeiner, M., Wong, E. M., Rick, I. P., Hocke, M., Landgraf, T., von der Emde, G.. 2025-02-25. Interactive electrical behaviour in mormyrid weakly electric fish: Jamming avoidance response or social interaction?. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.24.639824

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Deconstructing Boldness: Latent behavioural structure across novelty, predation, and exploration in an endangered species translocation program

Risk-related behaviours including neophobia, exploration, and predator avoidance are often assumed to covary along a general boldness axis. Although some translocation studies have linked one or more of these behaviours with fitness, it is possible that the underlying behavioural structure varies under different selective environments. Conservation breeding programs provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the structure of behavioural correlations in a non-domestic species under artificial conditions. We tested whether risk-related behaviours represent a unified boldness syndrome in a captive population of the endangered Attwaters prairie chicken (APC; Tympanuchus cupido attwateri). We quantified the repeatable behaviours of 257 juveniles and compared 11 models of behavioural covariation structure using multivariate mixed models and confirmatory factor analysis. There was no support for a single risk-taking axis; instead, we found three dimensions representing responses to novelty and environmental stimuli (Engagement), predator avoidance (Threat Response), and maze exploration (Maze Progression). Our results indicate that these risk-related behaviours are not organized along a single axis in captive APCs, challenging assumptions that risk-taking represents a universal behavioural syndrome. To anticipate post-release success accurately, conservation managers should understand the exact behavioural architecture of the captive population rather than assume that the classical bold-shy structure occurs in all contexts.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Social costs of group life: Larger groups have less affiliative behavior and more social conflict

The costs and benefits of sociality depend in part upon the size of groups. Therefore, individual behavior should vary across groups of different sizes, reflecting group size-dependent costs and benefits. Here, we test this prediction using a long-term dataset on wild female baboons (Papio cynocephalus x P. anubis). We find that individuals who live in larger groups suffer social costs: compared to animals in smaller groups, they experience more agonistic interactions, fewer grooming interactions, and sparser social networks. These social costs arise, in part, from a pattern in which relationships within dyads become more agonistic as group size increases (i.e., a given dyad exhibits fewer grooming interactions relative to agonistic interactions when it is living in a larger group). While individuals in large groups generally maintain the same number of strong bonds as individuals in small groups, they tend to develop weak bonds with a greater number of social partners that results in, on average, weaker bonds overall. Our results demonstrate that, despite potential benefits to large groups in terms of predation risk and intergroup competition, the social lives of individuals in larger groups involve less affiliation and more conflict in this wild primate population.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Shared brain transcriptome signatures of social evolution and plasticity in shell-dwelling cichlid fishes

Inter-individual variability in phenotypic traits is widespread in nature both across and within species, with similar patterns of variation often occurring between and within species. Given that these two types of variation are generated by evolutionary and plasticity processes respectively, it raises the question to what extent the causal mechanisms underlying such variability at these two different levels are shared or not. To address this question, we studied the variation in brain transcriptomes in Tanganyikan cichlids that exhibit both intra- and interspecific variation in social behavior. We compared two facultatively social cichlid species, each containing naturally occurring solitary and social-living individuals, with a closely related obligatory solitary resembling the ancestral state. Differential gene expression and Gene Set Enrichment Analyses were performed in the telencephalon and diencephalon transcriptomes to investigate the molecular basis of both behavioral plasticity and the evolution of sociality. Behavioral plasticity involved few differentially expressed genes but extensive changes in biological pathways, supporting a highly polygenic architecture of social behavior. Across both species, social-living individuals consistently upregulated pathways involved in translation, protein homeostasis, and energy metabolism, whereas solitary individuals showed enrichment of neuronal morphogenesis, cell adhesion, and structural plasticity. Remarkably, these same functional programs were associated with the independent evolution of sociality, revealing a strong overlap between evolutionary and plastic transcriptional responses. This convergence was largely restricted to the telencephalon, while the diencephalon showed limited and inconsistent functional signatures. Together, our results support the repeated recruitment of gene regulatory programs during the evolution of sociality and demonstrate that behavioral plasticity and evolutionary transitions share common neurogenomic responses, consistent with a conserved genetic toolkit for social behavior.

animal behavior and cognition↗