Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.02.21.639478

Differential AXL expression and regulation of Arf1 controls matrix stiffness-dependent Golgi organization and function in breast cancer cells

Abstract

Integrin-mediated cell-matrix adhesion regulates cell growth and survival and is often deregulated in transformed cancer cells, promoting anchorage independence. Integrins are essential regulators of cellular mechanotransduction, known to be altered in cancer cells. In breast cancers, tumour stiffening is a well-characterized feature of the disease progression. The Golgi apparatus, regulated by integrin-mediated adhesion in responding to mechanosensory cues, could support cancer progression. MDAMB231 and MCF7 cells with distinct Golgi organization and altered mechanosensing were evaluated. In MDAMB231 cells the organized Golgi in stable adherent cells becomes disorganised on loss of adhesion. This contrasts with MCF7 cells, where the Golgi remains disorganized regardless of the adhesion status. In MDAMB231 cells, increasing matrix stiffness promotes Golgi organization and regulates Golgi-dependent microtubule acetylation. In MCF7 cells, the Golgi stays disorganised despite increasing stiffness. Both cell types show stiffness-dependent cell spreading, with MCF7 cells spreading more efficiently than MDAMB231 cells - a difference that may be partially mediated by their differential Golgi organization. AXL, a receptor tyrosine kinase, is known to be involved in rigidity sensing and is differentially expressed in MDAMB231 (high) vs MCF7 (no expression) cells. AXL inhibition (by R428) and siRNA-mediated AXL knockdown disrupt stiffness-dependent Golgi organization in MDAMB231 cells, promoting cell spreading. Transient and stable AXL expression in MCF7 cells causes the Golgi to become predominantly organised and respond to higher matrix stiffness, affecting cell spreading. Stiffness-dependent AXL expression supports stiffness-dependent Arf1 expression and activation to drive Golgi organization. Thus, matrix mechanosensing through the AXL-Arf1-Golgi pathway could regulate vital cellular processes in breast cancer cells.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Saha, A., Sherkhane, T., Balasubramanian, N.. 2025-02-21. Differential AXL expression and regulation of Arf1 controls matrix stiffness-dependent Golgi organization and function in breast cancer cells. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.21.639478

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Differential requirement for the Ire1 luminal domain in Candida albicans drug susceptibility and pathogenicity

The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans depends on the unfolded protein response (UPR) for cell wall integrity, antifungal tolerance, filamentous growth, and virulence. The UPR is driven by the conserved transmembrane sensor Ire1, which is activated either by misfolded proteins through its luminal domain or by lipid bilayer stress (LBS) through its transmembrane domain. In budding yeast, these two activation modes deploy divergent transcriptional programs. Whether the requirement for these two input domains is separable in C. albicans, where the cell membrane and cell wall are themselves the targets of major antifungal drug classes, remains unknown. Here, we engineered a C. albicans strain expressing Ire1 lacking an intact luminal domain (ire1{Delta}LD), which no longer detects proteotoxic stress. The ire1{Delta}LD strain grew in the presence of the azole antifungals fluconazole and miconazole but was highly sensitive to heat shock, cell wall stress, and the echinocandin caspofungin. It was also unable to sustain filamentous growth and showed reduced virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RNA sequencing revealed only modest changes to the steady-state transcriptome of ire1{Delta}LD cells. Together, these findings define a differential requirement for the input domains of C. albicans Ire1, uncoupling growth under azole-induced membrane stress from the cell wall, thermal, and virulence-associated outputs that depend on proteotoxic sensing, a distinction that could inform antifungal strategies targeting the UPR.

cell biology↗

Nucleosome Core Allostery Governs Chromatin Recognition and Cell Fate

Nucleosomes regulate chromatin folding, accessibility, and factor recruitment. Current models primarily attribute these functions to histone tail modifications, while the core is largely viewed as a structural scaffold. Yet subtle changes within the nucleosome core can produce profound functional consequences, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we describe nucleosome core allostery as a fundamental principle of chromatin regulation that amplifies the impact of minimal nucleosome variations. Leveraging natural differences between H2A.Z variants, we show that the nucleosome core encodes distinct conformational dynamics that propagate allosterically, thereby controlling nucleosome accessibility and recognition by chromatin factors. As a result, a single buried amino acid substitution alone is sufficient to reprogram nucleosome dynamics and bias cell identity. Our findings establish the nucleosome core as an allosteric regulatory module and provide a generalizable framework for how subtle variation within nucleosomes is amplified into diverse biological outcomes in development and disease.

cell biology↗

YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics coordinate progenitor expansion and differentiation commitment

Progenitor cells must proliferate to expand the cell population, yet terminal differentiation requires this proliferative state to end. How signaling controls the duration of this proliferative window remains poorly understood. Using adipogenesis and live single-cell imaging of differentiation, cell-cycle, and ERK-activity reporters, we show that YAP and TAZ coordinate progenitor expansion with differentiation commitment by regulating ERK dynamics. YAP/TAZ maintain cells in a fluctuating high-ERK state that promotes proliferation while actively keeping the differentiation driver PPARG below the threshold for irreversible commitment. Crucially, this differentiation block is not explained by proliferation alone: inhibiting CDK4/6 or AKT suppressed proliferation without restoring differentiation, whereas MEK-ERK inhibition restored differentiation even when YAP/TAZ activity remained high. As YAP/TAZ activity decreases, dampened ERK fluctuations trigger PPARG activation. These findings support a self-limiting model in which YAP/TAZ-driven progenitor expansion progressively increases cell density and contact-dependent Hippo signaling, reducing YAP/TAZ activity and terminating the proliferative phase. Consequently, transient YAP/TAZ activation expands the progenitor pool while preserving subsequent differentiation, whereas sustained activation suppresses commitment. Together, these findings identify YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics as the nexus coordinating progenitor expansion with terminal differentiation and suggest that slower density-dependent Hippo feedback may set the duration of this proliferative window to regulate differentiated cell-number output.

cell biology↗