Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.02.07.637072

Exploring ID4 as a Driver of Aggression and a Therapeutic Target in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract

Basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) is characterized by an aggressive clinical course, high genomic instability, and limited therapeutic options. The Inhibitor of Differentiation 4 (ID4) protein has been identified as a critical regulator of BLBC, where its overexpression correlates with poor prognosis. However, the mechanistic contributions of ID4 to BLBC tumorigenesis remain incompletely understood. In this study, we employed an integrative approach combining CRISPR-Cas9-mediated ID4 knockout, small-molecule inhibition, in vivo tumor modeling, and in silico transcriptional analyses to investigate the functional role of ID4 in BLBC. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout of ID4 in MDA-MB-231 cells resulted in significant reductions in proliferation, colony formation, and Ki67 expression, indicating a loss of aggressive phenotypic traits. In vivo xenograft studies further revealed that ID4-silenced cells exhibited markedly delayed tumor formation and a significant reduction in metastatic potential compared to controls. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of basal-like tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset demonstrated that patients with low ID4 expression had improved relapse-free survival. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of BLBC tumors stratified by ID4 expression revealed a shift toward luminal-like transcriptional programs in the ID4-low subgroup, including increased estrogen response and inflammatory signaling pathways. Furthermore, transcription factor activity analysis identified the activation of MYC, JUN, and STAT in ID4-low tumors, suggesting a transition toward a more differentiated phenotype. Finally, pharmacological inhibition of ID4 using the small-molecule degrader AGX51 effectively reduced proliferation in TNBC cells, highlighting ID4 as a potential therapeutic target. Together, these findings establish ID4 as a key driver of BLBC aggressiveness and suggest that its inhibition may represent a viable therapeutic strategy. This study provides compelling evidence supporting the development of ID4-targeted therapies for TNBC patients, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes in this challenging disease subset.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Toro, C. D., Real, S. M., Laurito, S. R., Branham, M. T.. 2025-02-08. Exploring ID4 as a Driver of Aggression and a Therapeutic Target in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.07.637072

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

m6A-Driven Intratumoral Cholesterol Biosynthesis Fuels Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Progression

Both nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) machinery are indispensable for proper cellular function. Although their collaborative roles in the nuclear export of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) have been reported, it remains ambiguous whether and how this collaboration may contribute to cancer progression. Here we identify a functional cooperation between NPCs and m6A signaling that promotes the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We showed that nuclear export of m6A-modified mRNAs, mediated by the interaction between RNA methyltransferase METTL3 and the nucleoporin NUP93, is functionally coupled to cholesterol biosynthesis. Given that cholesterol-fueled intratumoral androgen production is one of the mechanisms driving CRPC, we demonstrated that overexpression of the wild-type METTL3 or NUP93, but neither the enzymatically dead METTL3 nor the mutant NUP93 that loses METTL3-interacting capability, elevates intracellular levels of androgens, activates AR signaling under castrate condition, and promotes androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of METTL3 or targeted demethylation on mRNAs encoding key cholesterol biosynthesis enzymes effectively suppressed CRPC malignancy. Together, these findings uncover a therapeutically targetable m6A-METTL3-NUP93 axis that links nuclear mRNA export and metabolic reprogramming to fuel CRPC progression, providing a conceptually new strategy for the treatment of this lethal disease.

cancer biology↗

ST6Gal2 promotes α2,6-sialylation and aggressive phenotypes in neuroblastoma cells

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. Its clinical behavior ranges from spontaneous regression to lethal, treatment-refractory disease. Aberrant 2,6-sialylation contributes to aggressive phenotypes in many cancers, but the role of ST6Gal2, a neural-enriched 2,6-sialyltransferase, in neuroblastoma is largely unexplored. Here, we examine the clinical and functional significance of ST6Gal2 in neuroblastoma. In two independent public cohorts (SEQC, n=498; Kocak, n=649), high ST6GAL2 expression was associated with significantly worse overall and event-free survival. In the SEQC cohort, ST6GAL2 expression was higher in high-risk and MYCN-amplified tumors, varied across International Neuroblastoma Staging System stages, and correlated positively with a mesenchymal transcriptional signature (Spearman {rho}=0.181). The mesenchymal correlation was reproduced in the Kocak cohort ({rho}=0.204). Stable shRNA-mediated knockdown of ST6GAL2 in SK-N-AS and SK-N-BE(2) cells reduced proliferation and viability, impaired wound closure, and decreased migration and invasion. In preliminary experiments in SK-N-AS cells, ST6GAL2 knockdown reduced binding of Sambucus nigra agglutinin, consistent with a role for ST6Gal2 in 2,6-sialylation. Together, these findings link ST6Gal2 expression to aggressive clinical and transcriptional features and pro-tumorigenic phenotypes in neuroblastoma and nominate ST6Gal2-mediated sialylation as a candidate pathway for mechanistic study.

cancer biology↗

Unsupervised transcriptomic analysis of paired pre- and post-treatment specimens reveals divergent chemoimmunomodulatory induction trajectories in breast cancer

The immunomodulatory effects of chemotherapy (chemoimmunomodulation; CIM) are clinically consequential and heterogeneous, yet no systematic framework exists for classifying the immunomodulatory trajectory a tumor follows in response to treatment (CIM trajectory). Here, we present the CIM Induction Classifier (CIMIC), an unsupervised clustering pipeline leveraging delta gene expression across 3,189 CIM-related genes to classify specimens chemoimmunomodulatory trajectory. Applied to two pre- and post-chemotherapy breast cancer (BC) datasets (NKI/SMC, N = 36; NEO, N = 19) and nine epirubicin-perturbed triple-negative BC (TNBC) cell lines, CIMIC identified two divergent CIM trajectories: a functional CIM (Fun-CIM) trajectory, broadly conserved across tumors and cell lines and characterized by induction of inflammatory cell death, antigen presentation, viral mimicry, and adaptive immune activation programs, and a dysfunctional CIM (Dys-CIM) trajectory, characterized by induction of proteostatic and metabolic stress-adaptation programs, reduced immune cell abundances and cytotoxic activity, and enrichment of aggressive BC subtypes. Using survival and longitudinal transcriptomic data in NKI/SMC (N = 20), treatment-induced increases in Fun-CIM-associated genes and ssGSEA scores were associated with reduced recurrence, whereas Dys-CIM-associated genes and scores were associated with increased recurrence. In multivariable analyses within independent chemotherapy-treated BC cohorts (METABRIC, N = 412; SCAN-B, N = 2,462), higher baseline Fun-CIM ssGSEA scores were associated with better outcomes, whereas higher baseline Dys-CIM ssGSEA scores were associated with worse outcomes. These findings establish CIM as a dynamic, trajectory-level process and position CIMIC as a framework for defining CIM trajectories and supporting future efforts to identify predictors, mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies that maximize beneficial CIM.

cancer biology↗