Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.02.05.636755

Selecting a Window Size for the Analysis of Whole Genome Alignments using AIC

Ivan, J.·Frandsen, P. B.·Lanfear, R.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThe variation of evolutionary histories along the genome presents a challenge for phylogenomic methods to identify the non-recombining regions and reconstruct the phylogenetic tree for each region. To address this problem, many studies used the non-overlapping window approach, often with an arbitrary selection of fixed window sizes that potentially include intra-window recombination events. In this study, we proposed an information theoretic approach to select a window size that best reflects the underlying histories of the alignment. First, we simulated chromosome alignments that reflected the key characteristics of an empirical dataset and found that the AIC is a good predictor of window size accuracy in correctly recovering the tree topologies of the alignment. Due to the issue of missing data in empirical datasets, we then designed a stepwise non-overlapping window approach and applied this method to the genomes of erato-sara Heliconius butterflies and great apes. We found that the best window sizes for the butterflies chromosomes ranged from <125bp to 250bp, which are much shorter than those used in a previous study even though this difference in window size did not significantly change the most common topologies across the genome. On the other hand, the best window sizes for great apes chromosomes ranged from 500bp to 1kb with the proportion of the major topology (grouping human and chimpanzee) falling between 60% and 87%, consistent with previous findings. Additionally, we observed a notable impact of stochastic error and concatenation when using small and large windows, respectively. For instance, the proportion of the major topology for great apes was 50% when using 250bp windows, but reached almost 100% for 64kb windows. In conclusion, our study highlights the challenges associated with selecting a window size in non-overlapping window analyses and proposes the AIC as a more objective way to select the optimal window size for whole genome alignments.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

evolutionary biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ivan, J., Frandsen, P. B., Lanfear, R.. 2025-02-07. Selecting a Window Size for the Analysis of Whole Genome Alignments using AIC. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.05.636755

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

RELAX does not reproduce its own estimates at default settings, and its output does not show it

Selection-intensity estimates from RELAX are reported as a point value of K with a likelihood-ratio P. We report that, at default settings and on data of ordinary size, the program does not reproduce its own fits. Of 27 enzyme entries refitted under two optimiser configurations, none reproduced its log-likelihood to within 0.01 units; the median change was 103 units, the largest over 3,400, and four verdicts reversed. Eighty null orthologues reproduced none. A byte-identical command returned a distinct likelihood on every repetition, single-threaded, across three releases, and on alignments simulated under the fitted model, where 3.3 per cent of replicates reproduced. The documented random-number seed never reaches the generator when assigned on the command line, yet reads back as the value supplied. PAML localises the cause: its two-ratio model, without site classes, reproduced its log-likelihood for all 288 genes; its site-class models agreed for 27 to 67 per cent. The instability follows the mixture over sites, not the program. The output does not show it: 46 of 410 fits ended with a negative likelihood-ratio statistic, impossible under convergence, and 123 of 410 report a K re-estimated under a domain restriction rather than the unconstrained maximum. Of 234 published studies using RELAX, none reported a seed. Seeding while holding the thread count at one reproduced sixty of sixty runs on twenty genes under two releases; the seed alone reproduced none of five, and no documentation states the second condition. We recommend that fits be repeated and their dispersion published.

evolutionary biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Sequential accumulation of adaptive alleles forms an inversion supergene in deer mice

Supergenes are clusters of co-inherited loci that affect multiple or complex phenotypes. Despite the growing number of chromosomal inversions identified as supergenes in natural populations, their molecular basis and evolutionary history often remain obscure. Here, we identified two candidate genes, Slc45a2 and Npr3, within a 41-Mb inversion supergene in the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) that respectively drive darker coats and longer tails - two traits associated with forest adaptation. Mice homozygous for the inversion (inv/inv) exhibit elevated Slc45a2 expression in melanocytes relative to the congenic standard genotype (std/std), disrupting pheomelanin production. In parallel, downregulation of Npr3 in inv/inv mouse growth plates prolongs postnatal growth of caudal vertebrae, resulting in tail elongation. Population-level analyses further implicate that this supergene arose through the subsequent accumulation of the Npr3 allele within the inversion, rather than by capturing all beneficial mutations at its origin.

evolutionary biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Toxin structure shapes palatability in a chemically defended butterfly

The toxicity of chemical defences is well studied, but the potential contribution of compound structure to predator deterrence remains largely unexplored. Whether predation acts more strongly on toxicity or unpalatability remains largely untested, partly because few systems allow toxin structure to vary independently of quantity. Heliconius sara larvae provide such a system: those reared on Passiflora auriculata sequester cyclopentenyl cyanogenic glucosides (CGs), while those reared on P. biflora biosynthesise comparable quantities of aliphatic CGs. Using two invertebrate predators, Camponotus floridanus ants and Hierodula membranacea mantids, we tested whether this structural difference affects palatability independent of toxicity. Mantids rejected larvae with cyclopentenyl CGs more often than larvae with aliphatic CGs, despite no detectable difference in total CG content. This pattern was mirrored in extract-based assays with ants, independently of cyanide release: extracts with cyclopentenyl CGs remained deterrent, while extracts with aliphatic CGs did not differ in deterrence from water. Live larvae, by contrast, elicited similar responses from ants regardless of CG structure. These results show that variation in toxin structure can strongly affect palatability, with some compounds conferring greater protection than others. This demonstrates the importance of chemical structural diversity in the evolution of chemical defences.

evolutionary biology↗