Refinement Strategies for Tangram for Reliable Single-Cell to Spatial Mapping

Stahl, M.; Strasser, L. J.; Lio, C. T.; Bernett, J.; Röttger, R.; List, M.

doi:10.1101/2025.01.27.634996

Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.27.634996

Refinement Strategies for Tangram for Reliable Single-Cell to Spatial Mapping

Stahl, M.·Strasser, L. J.·Lio, C. T.·Bernett, J.·Röttger, R.·List, M.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

MotivationSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides comprehensive gene expression data at a single-cell level but lacks spatial context. In contrast, spatial transcriptomics captures both spatial and transcriptional information but is limited by resolution, sensitivity, or feasibility. No single technology combines both the high spatial resolution and deep transcriptomic profiling at the single-cell level without trade-offs. Spatial mapping tools that integrate scRNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics data are crucial to bridge this gap. However, we found that Tangram, one of the most prominent spatial mapping tools, provides inconsistent results over repeated runs. ResultsWe refine Tangram to achieve more consistent cell mappings and investigate the challenges that arise from data characteristics. We find that the mapping quality depends on the gene expression sparsity. To address this, we (1) train the model on an informative gene subset, (2) apply cell filtering, (3) introduce several forms of regularization, and (4) incorporate neighborhood information. Evaluations on real and simulated mouse datasets demonstrate that this approach improves both gene expression prediction and cell mapping. Consistent cell mapping strengthens the reliability of the projection of cell annotations and features into space, gene imputation, and correction of low-quality measurements. Our pipeline, which includes gene set and hyperparameter selection, can serve as guidance for applying Tangram on other datasets, while our benchmarking framework with data simulation and inconsistency metrics is useful for evaluating other tools or Tangram modifications. AvailabilityThe refinements for Tangram and our benchmarking pipeline are available in https://github.com/daisybio/Tangram_Refinement_Strategies. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=97 SRC="FIGDIR/small/634996v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5ef8a8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11707d7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@103e1f2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e713e9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

bioinformatics Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Stahl, M., Strasser, L. J., Lio, C. T., Bernett, J., Röttger, R., List, M.. 2025-01-28. Refinement Strategies for Tangram for Reliable Single-Cell to Spatial Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.27.634996

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Integrating Genomic Annotations and Traits Dependencies for single-nucleotide polymorphisms Prioritization with Causal Concept Bottleneck Models

Predicting common traits from single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) data is challenging due to polygenicity, small effect sizes, and the presence of potentially mediated or spurious cross-trait associations. We propose a modeling approach that combines genomic annotations with known cross-trait relations by leveraging Causally Reliable Concept Bottleneck Models (C2BM), a deep learning architecture that factors the joint trait distribution over a graph of interpretable concepts. This design allows trait predictions to leverage information from other observed traits in addition to genomic inputs. Furthermore, the interpretable architecture of the model enables us to investigate how specific trait-trait relationships influence SNP-level predictions. We evaluate the approach on a multi-trait GWAS dataset covering five traits and show that C2BM improves predictions when ground-truth labels for related traits are available. Moreover, by analyzing variations in how trait-trait relationships influence predictions, we postulate that such differences may reflect the presence or absence of shared genetic mechanisms or indirect effects. Accepted at the CIBB 2026 conference (https://cibb2026.teralab.ai/)

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2026

From Prompt to Pipeline: A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Model Coding Agents for Reproducible Bioinformatics Pipeline Construction

Agentic coding systems are increasingly presented as a way to reduce the engineering burden of scientific software development. Bioinformatics is a strong test case for this claim because useful pipelines must combine domain-specific analysis choices, command-line software, sample metadata, workflow orchestration, container or HPC execution, and interpretable quality-control reporting. We evaluated three agentic systems - Biomni, Claude Code, and Codex - on the same task: constructing a Nextflow DSL2 pipeline for paired-end CUT&Tag data that included read QC, trimming, alignment, filtering, duplicate removal, signal track generation, per-sample and group-level peak calling, control-aware group merging, annotation, FRiP calculation, deepTools visualizations, and final MultiQC reporting. Each system received the same detailed CRAFT-style prompt and was assessed against a hand-coded reference pipeline developed by the authors. All three systems produced pipeline implementations that appeared plausible at the level of documentation and file structure, but none fully satisfied the requested analysis. The most consequential failure was shared: the agent-generated pipelines performed some form of group-level merging but did not produce the requested merged-group reporting outputs. Sample-level MultiQC reports also disagreed with the reference report. Codex was closest to the reference for primary mapped-read counts, although its total-read accounting and report structure still differed. Claude Code produced the broadest final report, but its mapping summary mixed stages and therefore could not be treated as numerically correct. Biomni produced the strongest subjective documentation, but its read-count agreement with the reference report was poor and several failures required substantial Nextflow expertise to diagnose. These results suggest that current coding agents can accelerate scaffolding, documentation, and routine implementation, but they do not eliminate the need for expert review in bioinformatics workflow construction. For complex sequencing workflows, prompts must specify not only the biological intent, but also the exact stage semantics, acceptance tests, metadata contracts, expected report sections, resource propagation rules, and failure criteria needed to distinguish a plausible pipeline from a correct one.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2026

Cophylogeny simulators are not interchangeable: similarities, differences and structural biases in synthetic host-symbiont

Synthetic data are becoming increasingly important for computational studies of cophylogeny, including machine learning inference, benchmarking, and method testing. Several generators have been proposed to produce such data, but each relies on different assumptions about host-symbiont coevolution. These assumptions are often implicit and rarely examined, even though results can depend strongly on the synthetic model being used. In this article, we present a systematic structural analysis of representative cophylogeny generators under controlled scenarios. The goal is to make their assumptions explicit and to understand how these choices shape the synthetic data they produce as well as the conclusions that may be drawn from them.

bioinformatics↗