Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.21.634141

Biophysical modeling reveals the transcriptional regulatory mechanism of Spo0A, the master regulator in starving Bacillus subtilis

Zhang, Y.·Palma, C. S. D.·Chen, Z.·Zarazua-Osorio, B.·Fujita, M.·Igoshin, O. A.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In starving Bacillus subtilis bacteria, the initiation of two survival programs - biofilm formation and sporulation - is both controlled by the same phosphorylated master regulator Spo0A[~]P. Its gene, spo0A, is transcribed from two promoters, Pv and Ps, that are respectively regulated by RNAP holoenzymes bearing {sigma}A and {sigma}H. Notably, transcription is directly autoregulated by Spo0A[~]P binding sites known as 0A1, 0A2, and 0A3 box, located in between the two promoters. It remains unclear whether, at the onset of starvation, these boxes activate or repress spo0A expression, and whether the Spo0A[~]P transcriptional feedback plays a role in the increase in spo0A expression. Based on the experimental data of the promoter activities under systematic perturbation of the promoter architecture, we developed a biophysical model of transcription regulation of spo0A by Spo0A[~]P binding to each of the 0A boxes. The model predicts that Spo0A[~]P binding to its boxes does not affect the RNA polymerase recruitment to the promoters but instead affects the transcriptional initiation rate. Moreover, the effects of Spo0A[~]P binding to 0A boxes are mainly repressive and saturated early at the onset of starvation. Therefore, the increase in spo0A expression is mainly driven by the increase in RNAP holoenzyme levels. Additionally, we reveal that Spo0A[~]P affinity to 0A boxes is strongest at 0A3 and weakest at 0A2 and that there are attractive forces between the occupied 0A boxes. Our findings, in addition to clarifying how the sporulation master regulator is controlled, offer a framework to predict regulatory outcomes of complex gene-regulatory mechanisms. ImportanceCell differentiation is often critical for survival. In bacteria, differentiation decisions are controlled by transcriptional master regulators under transcriptional feedback control. Therefore, understanding how master regulators are transcriptionally regulated is required to understand differentiation. However, in many cases, underlying regulation is complex with multiple transcription factor binding sites and multiple promoters, making it challenging to dissect the exact mechanisms. Here, we address this problem for the B. subtilis master regulator Spo0A. Using a biophysical model, we quantitatively characterize the effect of individual transcription factor binding sites on each spo0A promoter. Further, the model allows to identify the specific transcription step that is affected by transcription factor binding. Such model is promising for the quantitative study of a wide range of master regulators involved in transcriptional feedback.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

biophysicsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhang, Y., Palma, C. S. D., Chen, Z., Zarazua-Osorio, B., Fujita, M., Igoshin, O. A.. 2025-01-25. Biophysical modeling reveals the transcriptional regulatory mechanism of Spo0A, the master regulator in starving Bacillus subtilis. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.21.634141

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Mechanism of molecular recognition revealed through dynamic drug binding pathways to SARS-CoV-2 main protease

Characterization of drug-binding pathways remains experimentally limited by transient intermediates and computationally challenging due to long timescales intractable for conventional molecular dynamics. To address these challenges, we combined solution NMR titrations with weighted ensemble (WE) enhanced sampling simulations to resolve atomistic pathways of nirmatrelvir binding to the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. NMR titration revealed residue-dependent heterogeneity spanning fast, intermediate, and slow exchange regimes. WE simulations complement the NMR by providing insights into unassigned residues and adding time-resolved and three-dimensional structural context. We map key interactions along two distinct binding pathways, provide dynamic explanations for residues involved in resistance, and capture unique backbone conformations compared to those sampled in unbound or bound states. Our comprehensive binding model is consistent with a combined conformational selection and induced fit mechanism in which early transient contacts are made with residues E47 and L50 and allosteric motions are centered around residue V204 of the distal domain. This synergistic application of WE and titration NMR enables a more comprehensive characterization of drug binding than either method alone, providing an integrated framework that may have broader applicability to defining structure-kinetic relationships and guiding design of next-generation inhibitors.

biophysics↗
bioRxiv2026

Discriminating betacoronavirus receptor usage across subgenera using protein structure prediction and molecular dynamics

A critical step in the emergence of a virus is the ability of the viral protein to bind a host receptor and mediate cell entry. For many coronaviruses, this interaction occurs between the Spike S1 subunit and the human ACE2 receptor. Whether this binding interface can be computationally distinguished across unstudied viruses without experimentally resolved protein structures remains an open question. We predicted how 28 emerging coronaviruses may bind to human ACE2 using structural predictions, static interaction prediction programs, and molecular dynamics simulations. To screen the emerging coronaviruses, we predicted a library of S1 structures using AlphaFold. These predicted structures were then used to model the S1-ACE2 interaction with AlphaFold, ClusPro, and HADDOCK. We used known ACE2-binding sarbecoviruses as positive controls and coronaviruses that bind other receptors as negative controls to threshold predicted binding. Contact analysis quantified the predicted binding and revealed that these static interaction prediction methods varied in discriminative power. Less restrained static predictions separated binders from non-binders, whereas heavily restrained docking did not, potentially forcing an interaction where none should exist. This analysis highlighted an emerging coronavirus, Zhejiang2013, as a potential ACE2 binder. We used molecular dynamics simulations to further assess the static predictions and model the interaction over time. Overall, our results indicate that Zhejiang2013 exhibits dynamic interaction patterns consistent with ACE2 binding. Given that two ACE2-binding coronaviruses have caused global pandemics within the past two decades, identifying potential ACE2 binders is critical for early warning and pandemic preparedness.

biophysics↗
bioRxiv2026

De novo design of flexible protein interactions with GuideFlip

De novo design of protein binders requires a target structure. However, for flexible targets, such as intrinsically disordered proteins, this structure does not exist until the binder has stabilized the interaction. Such targets are therefore difficult for methods that separate structure generation from sequence design. We introduce GuideFlip, which co-designs structure and sequence through guided discrete flow matching: binder residues are assigned progressively while the complex is re-predicted at each step, allowing the evolving interface to affect the design process. GuideFlip reduces the hydrophobic bias of direct AlphaFold optimization and improves in silico success rates over existing approaches. We release a database of binder candidates for 177 human disordered proteins. Experimentally, we obtain de novo binders to the C-terminus of -synuclein and the disordered amino terminus of RBX1 with hit rates of 13.5% and 41.7%, respectively, and we confirm the epitopes of selected binders by NMR and mutagenesis. Applying GuideFlip to flexibility on the binder side, we design a nanobody that binds the agonist-bound {beta}1-adrenergic receptor in the active state, but not the receptor in its inactive state, with a 75% hit rate and cryo-EM structure confirming the design. GuideFlip enables protein design where bound structures emerge only upon binding.

biophysics↗