Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.20.633311

Transcriptomic analysis of chronic chikungunya in the Reunionese CHIKGene cohort uncovers a shift in gene expression more than 10 years after infection

Abstract

AimIn 2005-2006, a chikungunya epidemic of unprecedented magnitude hit Reunion Island, which raised a public health concern through the substantial proportions of long-lasting manifestations. To understand the pathophysiology underlying chronic chikungunya (CC), we designed the CHIKGene cohort study and collected blood samples from 133 subjects diagnosed with CC and from 86 control individuals that had recovered within 3 months, 12-to-15 years after exposure. MethodsWe conducted bulk RNAseq analysis on peripheral blood mononuclear cells to find differentially expressed genes (DEGs), gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and gene ontologies to uncover top-level enriched terms associated with DEGs, and weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to elucidate underlying cellular processes. ResultsAmong 1549 DEGs, gene expression analysis identified 10 top genes including NR4A2 and TRIM58 (upregulated in CC), IGHG3 and IGHV3-49 (downregulated in CC) linked to immune regulation, OSBP2 (upregulated in CC) and SEMA6B (downregulated in CC) linked to neuronal homeostasis and axon guidance, respectively. GSEA and WGCNA unveiled cellular processes such as "Metabolism of RNA" and "Cell Cycle". ConclusionsThis study uncovers a shift in gene expression of CC subjects. IGHG3 and IGHV3-49 gene shut-offs spotlight the importance of neutralizing antibodies against chikungunya virus in the progression to chronic disease. Human diseases associations highlight connections to rheumatoid arthritis, nervous and cardiac systems. GSEA and WGCNA bounce the hypotheses of a persistent viral reservoir or an increased susceptibility to RNA viral pathogens with new onset infections. Together, our findings might offer potential targets for therapeutic options aimed at alleviating chronic chikungunya.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gerardin, P., Medina-Santos, R., Le Clerc, S., Bruneau, L., Maillot, A., Labib, T., Rahmouni, M., Spadoni, J.-L., Meyniel, J.-P., Cornet, C., Lefebvre, C., El Jahrani, N., Savara, J., Mathew, M. J., Fontaine, C., Payet, C., Ah-You, N., Chabert, C., Mussard, C., Porcherat, S., Medjane, S., Noirel, J., Marimoutou, C., Hocini, H., Zagury, J.-F.. 2025-01-22. Transcriptomic analysis of chronic chikungunya in the Reunionese CHIKGene cohort uncovers a shift in gene expression more than 10 years after infection. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.20.633311

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗