Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.12.632638

A novel citizen science-based wildlife monitoring and management tool for oil palm plantations

Abstract

Agricultural expansion is one of the greatest threats to global biodiversity. At the same time, many wildlife species survive or even thrive in agricultural landscapes that retain patches of natural ecosystems. This is especially true for tropical oil palm (Elaeis guineensis, Jacq.) plantations that have both replaced tropical forest and other species-rich ecosystems, but as perennial crops can also function as wildlife habitat, especially if fragments of natural ecosystems are retained. There is an urgent need to understand how to manage and monitor wildlife in these fragmented oil palm landscapes. Still, the lack of large, quantitative datasets on species abundance impedes learning. We piloted a novel citizen science-based biodiversity monitoring system in Austindo Nusantara Jayas seven Indonesian oil palm estates, across different biogeographical regions, over a 5-year period. The company-wide monitoring system called PENDAKI, the Indonesian acronym for Care for Biodiversity, is the first of its kind in the palm oil industry. Here we demonstrate that such unstructured and opportunistic data collected mainly by lay people can result in valuable information on temporal and spatial changes in species occupancy. Between September 2019 and June 2024, PENDAKI has resulted in 148,286 wildlife observations, that included 699 reliably identified faunal and 186 floral species, with contributions from 3,950 employee contributors. We estimate species-specific occupancy rates using Bayesian occupancy modeling, ideally suited for opportunistic data where survey effort is unknown. We show that these occupancy data can reliably show temporal and spatial changes in the distribution of iconic wildlife such as orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). We combined data from reliably identified species with at least 50 records to create the "Living Plantation Index", an estate-specific annual index of wildlife diversity based on occupancy estimates. We conclude that citizen science-based biodiversity monitoring works remarkably well in oil palm plantations because of the large number of people typically working there. In the process we discovered the emergence of co-benefits such as increasing environmental stewardship awareness across the workforce, raising the profile of the conservation department within the company. We also noted the benefits in terms of suitable data to meet regulatory and voluntary disclosure requirements.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maharani, N., Nardiyono, N., Swayanuar, P., Munthe, C. R., NiMatullah, S., Sueif, S., Zaini, S., Supriatna, J., Kusrini, M., Dennis, R., van Balen, B., van Strien, A., Meijaard, E.. 2025-01-13. A novel citizen science-based wildlife monitoring and management tool for oil palm plantations. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.12.632638

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Internal Grant Review: A Pre-Submission Program for Early-Career Clinical and Translational Researchers

The iTHRIV Scholars Mentored Career Development Program initiated an Internal Grant Review (IGR) program in 2020 for current and recently graduated Scholars seeking funding through K and R awards from the NIH. The IGR program is designed to replicate the NIH review process and provide Scholars the opportunity to receive valuable feedback on their applications prior to NIH submission. A key characteristic of the program is the integration of REDCap, enabling automation and year-round offering while improving tracking and reporting efforts and capabilities. Results of the program have been overall positive, both in proposal development and participant feedback. IGR is a sustainable, valuable resource for early-career faculty competing for limited resources in the pursuit to become independently funded clinical translational scientists.

scientific communication and education↗

Multi-Lab Testing of Early Preclinical Discoveries Identifies Promising Treatments

A fundamental challenge in drug development is the frequent failure of early laboratory research to translate into clinical benefit. One promising solution is to confirm findings from exploratory single-laboratory studies across multiple laboratories before clinical testing. We investigated this approach following the conduct of preclinical multi-laboratory studies across different fields of medicine. For this, we evaluated effect sizes, experimental rigor, and a set of criteria to identify determinants of confirmation success. When tested under increased rigor, only a fraction of multi-laboratory studies confirmed the initial results. The underlying effect size reduction was associated with outcome-relevant experimental differences between exploratory and confirmatory stages. In summary, multi-laboratory studies proved highly informative and served as an effective filter for promising treatments.

scientific communication and education↗

Technology-enhanced learning in undergraduate neuroscience education: tractography-based virtual dissection in psychology

Background: Neuroanatomy poses a significant challenge for Psychology students due to its spatial and conceptual complexity. Educational approaches that enhance the relevance and visualization of neuroanatomical content may improve students learning experiences. This study implemented a tractography-based activity focused on the virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus, a major white matter pathway, in undergraduate Psychology students and examined the relationships between perceived learning and students perceptions of utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Methods: First-year undergraduate Psychology students participated in a two-session tractography-based activity combining instruction on white matter anatomy and diffusion tractography with a hands-on virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus using research-grade software routinely employed in neuroscience research. Following the activity, students completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing perceived learning, utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Pearson correlations, multiple regression analyses, and relative importance analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-eight students completed the questionnaire. Students reported generally positive perceptions of the activity across the evaluated dimensions, with perceived learning receiving the highest mean score (M = 3.44, SD = .85). Perceived utility showed the strongest association with perceived learning (r = .64, p < .001). The regression model explained 41% of the variance in perceived learning (R2 = .41, adjusted R2 = .38, p < .001). Perceived utility was the only significant predictor in the model ({beta} = .59, p = .001), accounting for 67.9% of the explained variance. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of integrating authentic neuroimaging tools into undergraduate neuroanatomy teaching. Students who perceived the activity as more useful also reported higher perceived learning outcomes, with perceived utility emerging as the strongest predictor of perceived learning. In contrast, perceived difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects did not make significant independent contributions. These results suggest that students perceptions of educational relevance may play an important role in technology-enhanced STEM learning experiences.

scientific communication and education↗