Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.10.632251

The "value perspectives of nature" scale: A validated scale to measure plural value perspectives of future nature from a transformative angle.

Buijs, A.·Dressel, S.·Jacobsen, J.·de Kruiff, T.·Uribe, L. Q.·Smith, A.·Gamborg, C.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sustainability transformations critically depend on understanding, assessing and monitoring the plural values of nature held across societies. However, while conceptual frameworks increasingly acknowledge a plurality of values, empirical indicators to reliably assess these multiple value types and their sub-dimensions remain scarce. We introduce the Plural Values of Nature (PVN) scale, integrating intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values into one multi-dimensional scale. This psychometric scale consists of 11 items and is designed to capture both distinctiveness and overlap of values. Using a seven-step process that includes qualitative and cognitive interviews, expert evaluations, and quantitative pre-testing and validation the scale is refined and validated across five European countries (representative sample; n = 1028). The validation study shows moderate to high internal consistency, reliability, and validity of the scale across all countries. Based on the development and validation of the PVN, we discuss methodological and conceptual issues and unpack the plurality of values of nature. Initial results show that considering the plurality of values is important to understand peoples attitudes towards e.g., nature restoration: People that endorse multiple values show more positive attitudes towards nature restoration than people endorsing only one specific value type (either instrumental, intrinsic, or relational values), with people endorsing all three value types simultaneously showing the highest support for such policies. As a concise survey-based social indicator, the PVN scale can be used to take stock of the plural values that societies hold regarding the future development of nature and to monitor potential shifts over time.

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Buijs, A., Dressel, S., Jacobsen, J., de Kruiff, T., Uribe, L. Q., Smith, A., Gamborg, C.. 2025-01-14. The "value perspectives of nature" scale: A validated scale to measure plural value perspectives of future nature from a transformative angle.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.10.632251

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Internal Grant Review: A Pre-Submission Program for Early-Career Clinical and Translational Researchers

The iTHRIV Scholars Mentored Career Development Program initiated an Internal Grant Review (IGR) program in 2020 for current and recently graduated Scholars seeking funding through K and R awards from the NIH. The IGR program is designed to replicate the NIH review process and provide Scholars the opportunity to receive valuable feedback on their applications prior to NIH submission. A key characteristic of the program is the integration of REDCap, enabling automation and year-round offering while improving tracking and reporting efforts and capabilities. Results of the program have been overall positive, both in proposal development and participant feedback. IGR is a sustainable, valuable resource for early-career faculty competing for limited resources in the pursuit to become independently funded clinical translational scientists.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2026

Multi-Lab Testing of Early Preclinical Discoveries Identifies Promising Treatments

A fundamental challenge in drug development is the frequent failure of early laboratory research to translate into clinical benefit. One promising solution is to confirm findings from exploratory single-laboratory studies across multiple laboratories before clinical testing. We investigated this approach following the conduct of preclinical multi-laboratory studies across different fields of medicine. For this, we evaluated effect sizes, experimental rigor, and a set of criteria to identify determinants of confirmation success. When tested under increased rigor, only a fraction of multi-laboratory studies confirmed the initial results. The underlying effect size reduction was associated with outcome-relevant experimental differences between exploratory and confirmatory stages. In summary, multi-laboratory studies proved highly informative and served as an effective filter for promising treatments.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2026

Technology-enhanced learning in undergraduate neuroscience education: tractography-based virtual dissection in psychology

Background: Neuroanatomy poses a significant challenge for Psychology students due to its spatial and conceptual complexity. Educational approaches that enhance the relevance and visualization of neuroanatomical content may improve students learning experiences. This study implemented a tractography-based activity focused on the virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus, a major white matter pathway, in undergraduate Psychology students and examined the relationships between perceived learning and students perceptions of utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Methods: First-year undergraduate Psychology students participated in a two-session tractography-based activity combining instruction on white matter anatomy and diffusion tractography with a hands-on virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus using research-grade software routinely employed in neuroscience research. Following the activity, students completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing perceived learning, utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Pearson correlations, multiple regression analyses, and relative importance analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-eight students completed the questionnaire. Students reported generally positive perceptions of the activity across the evaluated dimensions, with perceived learning receiving the highest mean score (M = 3.44, SD = .85). Perceived utility showed the strongest association with perceived learning (r = .64, p < .001). The regression model explained 41% of the variance in perceived learning (R2 = .41, adjusted R2 = .38, p < .001). Perceived utility was the only significant predictor in the model ({beta} = .59, p = .001), accounting for 67.9% of the explained variance. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of integrating authentic neuroimaging tools into undergraduate neuroanatomy teaching. Students who perceived the activity as more useful also reported higher perceived learning outcomes, with perceived utility emerging as the strongest predictor of perceived learning. In contrast, perceived difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects did not make significant independent contributions. These results suggest that students perceptions of educational relevance may play an important role in technology-enhanced STEM learning experiences.

scientific communication and education↗