Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.09.631990

Temporal Dynamics of Transcriptional Responses to Repeated mRNA Vaccination: Insights from Third Dose Profiling

Abstract

mRNA vaccines have played a crucial role in combating the COVID-19 pandemic, but the long-term dynamics of immune responses to repeated vaccination remain poorly understood. In this study, we extend our previous work on first and second dose responses by characterizing the immune signatures elicited by a third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines using high-resolution temporal profiling of blood transcriptomes collected daily for 9 days post-vaccination. We observed distinct patterns of gene expression related to interferon responses, inflammation, erythroid cell signatures, and plasmablast activity across the three doses. While the first dose elicited a modest response primarily characterized by interferon signaling, the second dose induced a robust, polyfunctional response. The third dose, administered approximately nine months later, maintained this polyfunctional character and matched the second dose in magnitude, though with distinct temporal dynamics. The interferon component peaked on day 2 (similar to the first dose) rather than day 1 (as seen in the second dose), while the erythroid signature showed a markedly different trajectory, with sustained elevation rather than decrease over the following week. Notably, we observed a progressive amplification of the plasmablast response across the three doses, with an earlier peak (day 4) compared to other vaccines, potentially a unique feature of mRNA vaccines. These findings demonstrate that the heightened, polyfunctional responsiveness induced by the second dose is robustly maintained even after a prolonged interval, suggesting effective immune memory. Our results contribute to understanding mRNA vaccine-induced immunity, with implications for optimizing booster strategies and developing next-generation vaccines.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rinchai, D., Deola, S., Kabeer, B. S. A., Gentilcore, G., Toufiq, M., Mathew, L. S., Liu, L., Vempalli, F., Mubarak, G., Lorenz, S., Augustine, T., van Panhuys, N., Bedognetti, D., Grivel, J.-C., Chaussabel, D.. 2025-01-11. Temporal Dynamics of Transcriptional Responses to Repeated mRNA Vaccination: Insights from Third Dose Profiling. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.09.631990

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Common viral infections seed regionally distinct resident memory T cells in the human CNS

T cells persist in the central nervous system (CNS) and can drive both protection and neurological disease. How these cells are organized in humans and what they recognize is largely unknown. Here, we profiled CD8 T cells across anatomically distinct CNS regions, obtained through on-site autopsies and temporal lobe resection surgeries, using single-cell RNA sequencing, paired T cell receptor sequencing, and DNA-barcoded tetramers. Resident memory T cells (TRM) specific for Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2 were identified across CNS compartments. Anatomical location was the strongest correlate of TRM cell state, with leptomeningeal cells adopting a cytokine-poised TRM program, whereas brain TRM cells were transcriptionally restrained. Cells of the same clonotype spanned tissues yet adopted local transcriptional states. Viral specificity added another layer of TRM heterogeneity with GZMK/GZMA-expressing EBV-specific populations and interferon-stimulated gene signatures in SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A-specific cells. The human CNS thus harbors regionally distinct CD8+ TRM shaped by common viral exposures.

immunology↗

A regulatory T cell signature provides a shared molecular basis for the therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatic disease

Rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and osteoarthritis (OA), show distinct phenotypes yet respond to overlapping therapies, implicating shared immune mechanisms. In the Transimmunom cohort, we profiled peripheral blood from 240 individuals (47 healthy, 44 OA, 91 RA, 58 SpA) across deep immunophenotyping, immunoproteomics and Treg-Teff transcriptomics. Single-layer analyses revealed broader Treg than Teff remodeling, along with a shared pattern of reduced activated Tregs and expanded Helios+ Tregs across all diseases, alongside a decrease in functional Treg subpopulations, including CTLA4+ and CD45RA- Tregs. In RA specifically, LAG3+ Tregs were also expanded. Combining omics layers outperformed single-layer approaches for disease classification. Among individual layers, Treg transcriptomes were most discriminative, and integration uncovered disease-specific programs. Unsupervised clustering identified a cross-disease cluster independent of activity, treatment and age, mapping to early disease (<= years) and dominated by a Treg dysfunction-associated program. These results provide a biological rationale for the therapeutic "window of opportunity" concept and duration-stratified Treg-directed trials.

immunology↗

Inhibitory Fc Receptor sets a time limit on macrophage response to IgG

Antibodies engage both activating Fc Receptors and the inhibitory receptor Fc{gamma}RIIB. Why macrophages need a dedicated inhibitory receptor rather than simply tuning activating receptor signaling is unclear. Using DNA-based chimeric receptors and in silico modeling, we independently controlled activating and inhibitory Fc Receptors. We found that Fc{gamma}RIIB imposed a time limit on macrophage phagocytosis and ERK signaling. The time limit is due to activating Fc Receptors converting PI(4,5)P2 to PI(3,4,5)P3, which is subsequently converted to PI(3,4)P2 by Fc{gamma}RIIB. This leads to a pulse of active signaling, which is sufficient for phagocytosis of small bacteria-sized targets but not phagocytosis of large targets and TNF secretion. Unlike engaging Fc{gamma}RIIB, reducing activating Fc Receptor signaling decreased initiation of phagocytosis, the speed of PI(3,4,5)P3 generation, and the amplitude of ERK signaling. Our results demonstrate that Fc{gamma}RIIB controls the duration of IgG signaling, while the activating Fc Receptors control sensitivity.

immunology↗