Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.12.18.629103

The physiological impact of an N-terminal Halo-tag on GIPR function in mice

Abstract

AimsG protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) modified with self-labelling enzymatic tags (e.g. Halo, SNAP, CLIP) have enabled the in vitro study of receptor expression and trafficking. We developed a GiprHalo/Halo mouse model to gain insights into endogenous glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) signalling, an important modulator of glucose and appetite homeostasis. MethodsGiprHalo/Halo mice were generated through ES cell-based gene targeting and physiologically characterised via body weight, oral glucose tolerance test and intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test analysis. Live cell imaging was used to measure cAMP responses in dispersed pancreatic islets from GiprWt/Wt and GiprHalo/Halo littermates in response to GIP. cAMP accumulation and surface receptor expression were assessed in AD293 cells transiently transfected with mouse and human untagged GIPR and Halo-GIPR. Endogenous pancreatic islet expression of Halo-GIPR was determined by immunohistochemistry. ResultsGiprHalo/Halo mice displayed comparable body weights and responses to oral glucose administration as GiprHalo/Wt and GiprWt/Wt littermates. However, GiprHalo/Halo mice only responded to high dose human GIP during intraperitoneal glucose tolerance testing, and cAMP responses to GIP were impaired in GiprHalo/Halo islets. Despite unimpaired surface expression, in vitro cAMP responses were lessened in AD293 cells expressing Halo-GIPR compared to untagged GIPR. Anti-Halo staining in mouse GiprHalo/Wt pancreatic islets displayed detectable signal. ConclusionsWhile the GiprHalo/Halo mouse model could be used to study endogenous GIPR expression, due to reduced responses we advise against its use for endogenous GIPR trafficking and signalling. Our study highlights the importance of carefully phenotyping mouse models in which modifications to endogenous proteins have been introduced.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Davies, I., Manchanda, Y., Sloop, K. W., Bloom, S. R., Tan, T. M., Tomas, A., Jones, B.. 2024-12-18. The physiological impact of an N-terminal Halo-tag on GIPR function in mice. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.18.629103

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Differential requirement for the Ire1 luminal domain in Candida albicans drug susceptibility and pathogenicity

The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans depends on the unfolded protein response (UPR) for cell wall integrity, antifungal tolerance, filamentous growth, and virulence. The UPR is driven by the conserved transmembrane sensor Ire1, which is activated either by misfolded proteins through its luminal domain or by lipid bilayer stress (LBS) through its transmembrane domain. In budding yeast, these two activation modes deploy divergent transcriptional programs. Whether the requirement for these two input domains is separable in C. albicans, where the cell membrane and cell wall are themselves the targets of major antifungal drug classes, remains unknown. Here, we engineered a C. albicans strain expressing Ire1 lacking an intact luminal domain (ire1{Delta}LD), which no longer detects proteotoxic stress. The ire1{Delta}LD strain grew in the presence of the azole antifungals fluconazole and miconazole but was highly sensitive to heat shock, cell wall stress, and the echinocandin caspofungin. It was also unable to sustain filamentous growth and showed reduced virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RNA sequencing revealed only modest changes to the steady-state transcriptome of ire1{Delta}LD cells. Together, these findings define a differential requirement for the input domains of C. albicans Ire1, uncoupling growth under azole-induced membrane stress from the cell wall, thermal, and virulence-associated outputs that depend on proteotoxic sensing, a distinction that could inform antifungal strategies targeting the UPR.

cell biology↗

Nucleosome Core Allostery Governs Chromatin Recognition and Cell Fate

Nucleosomes regulate chromatin folding, accessibility, and factor recruitment. Current models primarily attribute these functions to histone tail modifications, while the core is largely viewed as a structural scaffold. Yet subtle changes within the nucleosome core can produce profound functional consequences, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we describe nucleosome core allostery as a fundamental principle of chromatin regulation that amplifies the impact of minimal nucleosome variations. Leveraging natural differences between H2A.Z variants, we show that the nucleosome core encodes distinct conformational dynamics that propagate allosterically, thereby controlling nucleosome accessibility and recognition by chromatin factors. As a result, a single buried amino acid substitution alone is sufficient to reprogram nucleosome dynamics and bias cell identity. Our findings establish the nucleosome core as an allosteric regulatory module and provide a generalizable framework for how subtle variation within nucleosomes is amplified into diverse biological outcomes in development and disease.

cell biology↗

YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics coordinate progenitor expansion and differentiation commitment

Progenitor cells must proliferate to expand the cell population, yet terminal differentiation requires this proliferative state to end. How signaling controls the duration of this proliferative window remains poorly understood. Using adipogenesis and live single-cell imaging of differentiation, cell-cycle, and ERK-activity reporters, we show that YAP and TAZ coordinate progenitor expansion with differentiation commitment by regulating ERK dynamics. YAP/TAZ maintain cells in a fluctuating high-ERK state that promotes proliferation while actively keeping the differentiation driver PPARG below the threshold for irreversible commitment. Crucially, this differentiation block is not explained by proliferation alone: inhibiting CDK4/6 or AKT suppressed proliferation without restoring differentiation, whereas MEK-ERK inhibition restored differentiation even when YAP/TAZ activity remained high. As YAP/TAZ activity decreases, dampened ERK fluctuations trigger PPARG activation. These findings support a self-limiting model in which YAP/TAZ-driven progenitor expansion progressively increases cell density and contact-dependent Hippo signaling, reducing YAP/TAZ activity and terminating the proliferative phase. Consequently, transient YAP/TAZ activation expands the progenitor pool while preserving subsequent differentiation, whereas sustained activation suppresses commitment. Together, these findings identify YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics as the nexus coordinating progenitor expansion with terminal differentiation and suggest that slower density-dependent Hippo feedback may set the duration of this proliferative window to regulate differentiated cell-number output.

cell biology↗