Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.12.13.628260

Reduced enteric BDNF-TrkB signaling drives glucocorticoid-mediated GI dysmotility

Abstract

Stress is a key contributor to gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility, particularly in patients with disorders of gut-brain interactions (DGBI). Since GI motility is governed by the enteric nervous system (ENS), stress may act by altering ENS function. While stress activates glucocorticoid signaling via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the impact of stress-mediated glucocorticoid signaling on ENS biology remains poorly understood. In the central nervous system, glucocorticoids reduce specific isoforms of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), impairing signaling through its receptor, TrkB, and contributing to behavioral dysfunction. However, the identity of ENS-specific Bdnf isoforms, their glucocorticoid sensitivity, and the effect of enhanced TrkB signaling on GI motility in stressed animals has not been characterized. Here, using male and female mice, we show that >85% of post-natal ENS Bdnf transcripts are glucocorticoid-responsive isoforms. We also demonstrate that both BDNF and its receptor TrkB (Ntrk2) are expressed by enteric neurons. In male mice, stress and administration of dexamethasone--a synthetic glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonist--cause GI dysmotility, which we demonstrate is associated with significantly reduced Bdnf transcripts in the longitudinal muscle - myenteric plexus (LM-MP) tissue in vivo. Dexamethasone exposure also represses Bdnf transcript and mature protein levels in LM-MP tissue in vitro. Notably, treatment with HIOC, a selective TrkB agonist, rescues GI transit defects in dexamethasone-treated animals. These findings identify BDNF-TrkB signaling as a key modulator of stress-induced ENS dysfunction and highlight TrkB as a promising therapeutic target for GI dysmotility in DGBI. Significance statementHow stress causes gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility is not well understood. GI motility is regulated by the enteric nervous system (ENS), which is responsive to brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which signals through its receptor tropomyosin related kinase B (TrkB). By altering glucocorticoid signaling, stress modulates brains BDNF levels to cause behavioral changes. However, if this pathway is similarly responsible for stresss effects on GI dysmotility is not well understood. Here, by identifying the nature of ENS-specific Bdnf isoforms, studying their response to stress and glucocorticoid signaling, and testing the effect of a TrkB agonist to improve gut motility in a model of glucocorticoid-driven dysmotility, we implicate altered BDNF-TrkB signaling as an important mechanism driving stress-associated dysmotility.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Slosberg, J. S., Puttapaka, S., Seika, P., Hong, S. M., Singh, A., Kulkarni, S.. 2024-12-17. Reduced enteric BDNF-TrkB signaling drives glucocorticoid-mediated GI dysmotility. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.13.628260

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A Mechanistic Account of Dedifferentiation in the Aging Visual System

To uncover the mechanisms of age-related dedifferentiation, we simulated neural degradation in a computational model of the ventral visual stream. Severing connections or adding noise, whether in inferotemporal cortex (IT) or upstream, reduced IT differentiation, indicating that dedifferentiation need not originate locally. Degrading peripheral V1, which preferentially drove place-selective IT neurons, selectively reduced place differentiation, a candidate mechanism for the stronger place dedifferentiation reported in aging.

neuroscience↗

Reusing pipettes in Patch-seq: a foundation for automated multimodal profiling

Patch-seq is a technique for single-cell multimodal characterization. It combines whole-cell electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, and morphological reconstruction in single neurons. Patch-seq morphologies are a critical bridge among cell types, genes, physiology, and large-scale connectivity platforms such as EM connectomes and single-cell-resolution projectomes. However, patch-seq experimental complexity and operator dependence limit throughput. Automation could enable scalable Patch-seq but requires procedural adaptations, including detergent-based pipette cleaning, robotic nucleus extraction and collection. The impact of these automations on Patch-seq quality has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we show that each of these modifications preserves or improves key Patch-seq outcomes. Automated nucleus extraction performs comparably to, or better than, expert manual operation, preserving key RNA and morphological metrics. Detergent-cleaned, reused pipettes supported a viable sealing success rate across multiple cleaning cycles and preserved electrophysiological quality and transcriptomic yield without introducing excess contamination. Sonication effectively allows collection of nuclear material without damaging RNA and supports subsequent pipette cleaning and reuse. Enhanced automated sealing and break-in procedures increased throughput regardless of brain region, cell type or species. Together, these results validate the core procedural adaptations required for automated Patch-seq and establish a foundation for high-throughput, standardized multimodal single-cell characterization.

neuroscience↗

Development of direction selectivity in the Xenopus tadpole optic tectum and midbrain tegmentum

Detecting motion direction is a fundamental function performed by direction selective (DS) neurons. DS neurons in the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) enable the tracking of moving objects. DS neurons of the accessory optic system support reflexive eye / head movements that stabilize gaze during self-motion. By developmental stage 48 (10 days postfertilization), Xenopus tadpoles display visually guided behaviors that require both types of DS neurons. Our previous work has shown that these two regions are not only functionally distinct but also follow different developmental programs. Here we characterized and compared how direction selectivity develops in both visual processing centers. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings during moving bar visual stimulation, we measured DS synaptic inputs and spiking outputs in both regions across three key developmental stages of the retinotectal projection. Tegmental neurons were direction selective ab initio, and both input and output tuning remained stable across development. Tectal neurons were observed to receive DS inputs early, and their input selectivity also remained stable across development. However, their spiking output grew substantially more DS at the later developmental stage. This was due at least in part to a naturally occurring decrease in intrinsic excitability which preferentially dampened overall spike rates, but especially in response to the non-preferred direction of motion, thereby increasing direction selectivity. These results reveal distinct developmental trajectories in parallel visual pathways. Tegmental direction selectivity is established early and stays stable, whereas tectal output tuning sharpens during development through a decrease in intrinsic excitability.

neuroscience↗