Reporting quality of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methods in scientific publications

Abstract

Reproducibility is a significant concern in scientific research and complex methods like quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) demand stringent reporting standards to ensure that the methods are reproducible, data are sound, and conclusions are trustworthy. Although the MIQE (Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments) guidelines were introduced in 2009 to improve qPCR reporting, a 2013 study identified ongoing deficiencies that hinder reproducibility. To further investigate the transparency and completeness of qPCR reporting, we systematically assessed articles published in the top 20 journals in genetics and heredity (n=186) and plant sciences (n=246) that used qPCR. Our analysis revealed frequent omissions and inadequate specification of critical information necessary for evaluating and replicating qPCR experiments. RNA integrity, along with assessment methods and instruments used to assess it, are seldom reported. Although primer sequences are often disclosed, names and accession numbers of housekeeping genes are frequently omitted. Additionally, essential details about RNA extraction, RNA-to-cDNA conversion, and qPCR, such as kit names, catalog numbers, and reagent information, are often missing. Our findings underscore the urgent need for improved reporting practices in qPCR experiments, emphasizing quality controls, detailed descriptions of reagents and materials, and greater analytical transparency. Addressing these reporting deficiencies is crucial for enhancing the reproducibility and evaluating the trustworthiness of qPCR research. Potential solutions include encouraging authors to cite protocols published in online repositories, providing reporting templates, or developing automated tools to check reporting compliance.