Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.11.27.625611

The Influence of Divergent Thinking and Creative Personality on the Quality of Scientific Production and Innovation in a Dominican University

Montano Medina, G. A.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This study analyzed how the dimensions of divergent thinking (PD)--fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration--impacted quality and innovation in scientific production at a university in the Dominican Republic. Using a quantitative approach based on a Structural Equation Model (SEM), the relationships between the DP, the creative personality (PC) and the indicators of quality and scientific innovation were examined. The sample included 296 participants, composed of graduate students, researchers, and administrative staff, who completed structured questionnaires adapted to the Dominican context. The findings demonstrated that flexibility and originality were the most influential factors within the DP, positioning them as key predictors of academic creativity and scientific output (coefficient = 1.98, p < 0.001). In addition, it was identified that the CP acted as a significant mediator in the relationship between the PD and the quality of the research (coefficient = 0.495, p < 0.001). The analysis of social networks (SRA) showed that individuals with high creativity occupied central positions in collaborative networks, improving knowledge transfer and fostering interdisciplinary environments. This study underscored the importance of promoting educational strategies that stimulate creativity and innovation in academic contexts. It was recommended to implement integrative programs of divergent thinking skills, collaborative spaces for researchers and students, and policies that encourage creativity in scientific projects. The limitations of the cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reports highlighted the need for future research with longitudinal methods and qualitative techniques. These findings contributed to the understanding of how to optimize creativity and PD in academic institutions, reinforcing their impact on knowledge generation and scientific advancement in Latin American contexts. Author summaryCreativity and innovation are key factors for progress in all disciplines, particularly in academic and scientific research. This study examines the impact of divergent thinking (a cognitive process characterized by generating multiple solutions to a problem) on the quality and novelty of scientific research. The research, conducted at a Dominican university, focused on four key dimensions of divergent thinking: fluency (the number of ideas generated), flexibility (the ability to adapt ideas to diverse contexts), originality (the generation of unique ideas), and elaboration (the depth and detail applied to ideas). By using structured surveys and advanced statistical models, the results reveal that originality and flexibility are the most influential factors in fostering creativity and improving the quality of research. In addition, people with pronounced creative personalities, marked by openness to new experiences and the assumption of intellectual risks, were identified as central figures in collaborative academic networks. These individuals not only improved the quality of their own work, but also contributed to fostering innovation within their professional communities. The study highlights the need to implement institutional strategies that foster creativity in academic settings. Recommendations include promoting interdisciplinary collaboration, offering specific training programs for creative problem-solving, and providing institutional support for innovative research initiatives. Such efforts can significantly improve the ability of universities to generate breakthrough discoveries and equip students and researchers with the capabilities needed to address complex global challenges. By highlighting the vital role of creativity and divergent thinking in academic research, this study provides useful information for higher education institutions seeking to advance scientific knowledge and innovation in the twenty-first century.

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Montano Medina, G. A.. 2024-12-02. The Influence of Divergent Thinking and Creative Personality on the Quality of Scientific Production and Innovation in a Dominican University. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.27.625611

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Internal Grant Review: A Pre-Submission Program for Early-Career Clinical and Translational Researchers

The iTHRIV Scholars Mentored Career Development Program initiated an Internal Grant Review (IGR) program in 2020 for current and recently graduated Scholars seeking funding through K and R awards from the NIH. The IGR program is designed to replicate the NIH review process and provide Scholars the opportunity to receive valuable feedback on their applications prior to NIH submission. A key characteristic of the program is the integration of REDCap, enabling automation and year-round offering while improving tracking and reporting efforts and capabilities. Results of the program have been overall positive, both in proposal development and participant feedback. IGR is a sustainable, valuable resource for early-career faculty competing for limited resources in the pursuit to become independently funded clinical translational scientists.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2026

Multi-Lab Testing of Early Preclinical Discoveries Identifies Promising Treatments

A fundamental challenge in drug development is the frequent failure of early laboratory research to translate into clinical benefit. One promising solution is to confirm findings from exploratory single-laboratory studies across multiple laboratories before clinical testing. We investigated this approach following the conduct of preclinical multi-laboratory studies across different fields of medicine. For this, we evaluated effect sizes, experimental rigor, and a set of criteria to identify determinants of confirmation success. When tested under increased rigor, only a fraction of multi-laboratory studies confirmed the initial results. The underlying effect size reduction was associated with outcome-relevant experimental differences between exploratory and confirmatory stages. In summary, multi-laboratory studies proved highly informative and served as an effective filter for promising treatments.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2026

Technology-enhanced learning in undergraduate neuroscience education: tractography-based virtual dissection in psychology

Background: Neuroanatomy poses a significant challenge for Psychology students due to its spatial and conceptual complexity. Educational approaches that enhance the relevance and visualization of neuroanatomical content may improve students learning experiences. This study implemented a tractography-based activity focused on the virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus, a major white matter pathway, in undergraduate Psychology students and examined the relationships between perceived learning and students perceptions of utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Methods: First-year undergraduate Psychology students participated in a two-session tractography-based activity combining instruction on white matter anatomy and diffusion tractography with a hands-on virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus using research-grade software routinely employed in neuroscience research. Following the activity, students completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing perceived learning, utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Pearson correlations, multiple regression analyses, and relative importance analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-eight students completed the questionnaire. Students reported generally positive perceptions of the activity across the evaluated dimensions, with perceived learning receiving the highest mean score (M = 3.44, SD = .85). Perceived utility showed the strongest association with perceived learning (r = .64, p < .001). The regression model explained 41% of the variance in perceived learning (R2 = .41, adjusted R2 = .38, p < .001). Perceived utility was the only significant predictor in the model ({beta} = .59, p = .001), accounting for 67.9% of the explained variance. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of integrating authentic neuroimaging tools into undergraduate neuroanatomy teaching. Students who perceived the activity as more useful also reported higher perceived learning outcomes, with perceived utility emerging as the strongest predictor of perceived learning. In contrast, perceived difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects did not make significant independent contributions. These results suggest that students perceptions of educational relevance may play an important role in technology-enhanced STEM learning experiences.

scientific communication and education↗