Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.10.28.620621

Rhythms and Background (RnB): The Spectroscopy of Sleep Recordings

Abstract

Non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep is characterized by the interaction of multiple coupled oscillations essential for various functions such as memory consolidation, alongside a pervasive and dynamic arrhythmic 1/f scale-free background that may also contribute to these functions. Although recent spectral parametrization methods such as FOOOF (Fitting-One-and-Over-f) allowed to dissociate rhythmic and arrhythmic components in the spectral domain, they fail to resolve these processes in the time domain, where instantaneous measures of frequency, amplitude, and phase-amplitude coupling are still confounded by arrhythmic activity. This limitation represents a significant pitfall for studies of NREM sleep, which often rely on phase-based analyses of specific oscillations. To address this limitation, we introduce Rhythms & Background (RnB), a novel wavelet-based methodology designed to dynamically denoise time-series data by correcting for arrhythmic interference. This enables the extraction of a purely rhythmic time-series suitable for enhanced time-domain analyses of sleep rhythms. We first validate RnB through simulations, demonstrating its robust performance in accurately estimating spectral profiles of individual and multiple oscillations across a range of arrhythmic conditions. We then apply RnB to publicly available intracranial EEG sleep recordings, showing that it provides an improved spectral and time-domain representation of hallmark NREM rhythms. Finally, we demonstrate that RnB significantly enhances the assessment of phase-amplitude coupling between cardinal NREM oscillations, outperforming traditional methods that conflate rhythmic and arrhythmic components. This methodological advance offers a substantial improvement in the analysis of sleep oscillations, providing greater precision in the study of rhythmic activity critical to NREM sleep functions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe Rhythms and Background (RnB) algorithm introduces a novel approach to signal processing in electrophysiology by isolating rhythmic activity from the arrhythmic background at the time-series level. Unlike existing spectral decomposition methods, RnB enables more precise analysis of brain rhythms in both the time and spectral domains, providing clearer insights into cerebral oscillatory processes. This breakthrough has direct applications in studying brain connectivity and oscillation dynamics during sleep. Additionally, its application in clinical populations where pathological changes in arrhythmic activity are common, such as neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders, will help to better understand abnormal oscillatory processes. By improving the accuracy of rhythmic signal analysis, RnB opens new avenues for understanding brain function and dysfunction in research and clinical settings.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dube, J., Foti, M., Jaffard, S., Latreille, V., Frauscher, B., Carrier, J., Lina, J. M.. 2024-10-28. Rhythms and Background (RnB): The Spectroscopy of Sleep Recordings. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.28.620621

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A Mechanistic Account of Dedifferentiation in the Aging Visual System

To uncover the mechanisms of age-related dedifferentiation, we simulated neural degradation in a computational model of the ventral visual stream. Severing connections or adding noise, whether in inferotemporal cortex (IT) or upstream, reduced IT differentiation, indicating that dedifferentiation need not originate locally. Degrading peripheral V1, which preferentially drove place-selective IT neurons, selectively reduced place differentiation, a candidate mechanism for the stronger place dedifferentiation reported in aging.

neuroscience↗

Reusing pipettes in Patch-seq: a foundation for automated multimodal profiling

Patch-seq is a technique for single-cell multimodal characterization. It combines whole-cell electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, and morphological reconstruction in single neurons. Patch-seq morphologies are a critical bridge among cell types, genes, physiology, and large-scale connectivity platforms such as EM connectomes and single-cell-resolution projectomes. However, patch-seq experimental complexity and operator dependence limit throughput. Automation could enable scalable Patch-seq but requires procedural adaptations, including detergent-based pipette cleaning, robotic nucleus extraction and collection. The impact of these automations on Patch-seq quality has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we show that each of these modifications preserves or improves key Patch-seq outcomes. Automated nucleus extraction performs comparably to, or better than, expert manual operation, preserving key RNA and morphological metrics. Detergent-cleaned, reused pipettes supported a viable sealing success rate across multiple cleaning cycles and preserved electrophysiological quality and transcriptomic yield without introducing excess contamination. Sonication effectively allows collection of nuclear material without damaging RNA and supports subsequent pipette cleaning and reuse. Enhanced automated sealing and break-in procedures increased throughput regardless of brain region, cell type or species. Together, these results validate the core procedural adaptations required for automated Patch-seq and establish a foundation for high-throughput, standardized multimodal single-cell characterization.

neuroscience↗

Development of direction selectivity in the Xenopus tadpole optic tectum and midbrain tegmentum

Detecting motion direction is a fundamental function performed by direction selective (DS) neurons. DS neurons in the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) enable the tracking of moving objects. DS neurons of the accessory optic system support reflexive eye / head movements that stabilize gaze during self-motion. By developmental stage 48 (10 days postfertilization), Xenopus tadpoles display visually guided behaviors that require both types of DS neurons. Our previous work has shown that these two regions are not only functionally distinct but also follow different developmental programs. Here we characterized and compared how direction selectivity develops in both visual processing centers. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings during moving bar visual stimulation, we measured DS synaptic inputs and spiking outputs in both regions across three key developmental stages of the retinotectal projection. Tegmental neurons were direction selective ab initio, and both input and output tuning remained stable across development. Tectal neurons were observed to receive DS inputs early, and their input selectivity also remained stable across development. However, their spiking output grew substantially more DS at the later developmental stage. This was due at least in part to a naturally occurring decrease in intrinsic excitability which preferentially dampened overall spike rates, but especially in response to the non-preferred direction of motion, thereby increasing direction selectivity. These results reveal distinct developmental trajectories in parallel visual pathways. Tegmental direction selectivity is established early and stays stable, whereas tectal output tuning sharpens during development through a decrease in intrinsic excitability.

neuroscience↗