Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.10.24.620090

EpigeneticAgePipeline: an R package for comprehensive assessment of epigenetic age metrics from methylation microarrays

Abstract

Epigenetic age is a biological age estimate based on nuclear DNA methylation patterns. Epigenetic clocks measure biological age by analyzing predictable changes in DNA methylation sites associated with aging. This study introduces EpigeneticAgePipeline, an R package that streamlines the estimation of epigenetic age metrics including Horvath, Horvath skin and blood, Hannum, PhenoAge/Levine, GrimAge (V1, and V2), and DunedinPACE plus additional acceleration metrics based on all other clocks. Quality control includes detection p-value filtering (sample- and probe-level), bead-count thresholds, and Illumina quality control intensity checks. EpigeneticAgePipeline supports Illumina Infinium methylation microarrays (HumanMethylation27, HumanMethylation450, HumanMethylationEPIC/EPICv2, and Human Methylation Screening Array). It offers functionalities including data preprocessing, normalization, cell count imputation, residual generation accounting for principal components and batch effects, and extensive visualizations for improved interpretability. Validation was performed using GEO dataset GSE237561, confirming the accuracy of the pipeline. EpigeneticAgePipeline provides an integrated workflow from raw data to advanced statistical analyses and visualizations, improving usability over existing tools. In addition to the traditional clocks mentioned, the package also integrates a set of additional epigenetic age clocks (PedBE, Wu, TL, BLUP, and EN). Future updates will include emerging epigenetic age measures to maintain relevance in this evolving field.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rayevskiy, S., Le, Q., Nguyen, J., Chen, S. Q., Castellani, C. A.. 2024-10-25. EpigeneticAgePipeline: an R package for comprehensive assessment of epigenetic age metrics from methylation microarrays. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620090

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗