Benefits of combining individual and small group assessments as an instructional strategy

Arini, G. S.; Almeida, I. d. S.; Torres, B. B.

doi:10.1101/2024.10.21.619510

Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.10.21.619510

Benefits of combining individual and small group assessments as an instructional strategy

Arini, G. S.·Almeida, I. d. S.·Torres, B. B.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Assessment is an essential curricular component despite being often seen only as a performance metric resource. However, its full potential can be harnessed if it is used as a formative instrument. The present study evaluated the benefits of combining individual and group assessments. Students perceptions of this type of strategy, assessed through a Likert scale questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, showed that students acknowledge the benefits of this procedure. We then carried out a dual assessment in an active learning environment. Students were given individual written tests and completed the same test immediately after, but now in a group. The average group scores were higher than the average individual scores, even for students who scored the highest within a group. Put together, these results indicate combining individual and group assessments can be an effective teaching tool in addition to simply measuring student performance.

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and education Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Arini, G. S., Almeida, I. d. S., Torres, B. B.. 2024-10-23. Benefits of combining individual and small group assessments as an instructional strategy. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.21.619510

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2024

Employing Microsoft Sway as a Repository for Data Generated in Pharmaceutics Experimental Courses: A Case study on Topical Formulation Characterization

Microsoft Sway is an easy-to-use online creative software developed by Microsoft. It has many advantages as follows: easy to operate and does not require long-term practice and learning; network links can be created and accessed by devices such as Personal Computer (PC) and mobile terminals; Educators and Learners are allowed to browse this repository at anytime to facilitate the application prospects of mining relevant data. Therefore, the author proposes that Microsoft Sway may be a very promising data repository for pharmaceutical experimental teaching courses, and is expected to be extended to undergraduate experimental teaching in other natural science fields.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2024

Bridging the Python Training Gap for Bioscientists in Brazil: Improvements and Challenges

The rapid evolution of high-throughput technologies in biosciences has generated diverse and voluminous datasets, requiring bioscientists to develop data manipulation and analysis skills. Python, known for its versatility and powerful libraries, has become a crucial tool for managing these datasets. However, there is a significant lack of programming training for bioscientists in many countries. To address this knowledge gap among scientists in Brazil, the Brazilian Python Workshop for Biological Data was introduced several years ago, focusing on basic programming concepts and data handling techniques using popular Python libraries. Despite the progress and positive feedback from earlier editions, challenges persisted, necessitating continuous adaptation and improvement to meet the evolving needs of bioscientists.This work describes the advancements made in the 2021 and 2022 editions of the workshop and discusses new suggestions for its ongoing enhancement. Key innovations were introduced in the workshop structure and coordination, including the creation of new committees and the establishment of a code of conduct. Feedback forms were updated to enable real-time adjustments during the event, improving its overall effectiveness. The workshop also expanded its reach by increasing geographical diversity among participants. New didactic strategies, such as pair-teaching, code clubs, and the integration of information and communication technologies (ICTs), were implemented to enhance learning outcomes. Programming best practices and scientific reproducibility were emphasized through talks and hands-on activities, guided by PEP8 conventions. Furthermore, efforts to enhance scientific dissemination were intensified, with an increased presence on social media and participation in international scientific events and communication networks. Finally, we present updated recommendations for students, researchers, and educators interested in organizing and promoting similar events, building on those previously described.

scientific communication and education↗