Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.08.28.610133

Handy divisions: Hand-specific specialization of prehensile control in bimanual tasks

Abstract

When hammering a nail, why do right-handers wield the hammer in the right hand? The dynamic dominance theory suggests a somewhat surprising answer. The two hands are specialized for different types of tasks: the dominant for manipulating objects, and the non-dominant for stabilizing objects. Right-handers wield the moving object with their right hand to leverage the skills of both hands. Functional specialization in hand use is often illustrated using examples of object manipulation. However, the dynamic dominance theory is supported by wrist kinematics rather than object manipulation data. Therefore, our goal was to determine whether this theory extends to object manipulation. We hypothesized that hand-specific differences will be evident in the kinematics of hand-held objects and in the control of grip forces. Right-handed individuals held two instrumented objects that were coupled by a spring. They moved one object while stabilizing the other object in various bimanual tasks. They performed motions of varying difficulty by tracking predictable or unpredictable targets. The two hands switched roles (stabilization vs movement) in various experimental blocks. The changing spring length perturbed both objects. We quantified the movement performance by measuring the objects positions, and grip force control by measuring grip-load coupling in the moving hand and mean grip force in the stabilizing hand. The right hand produced more accurate object movement, along with stronger grip-load coupling, indicating superior predictive control of the right hand. In contrast, the left hand stabilized the object better and exerted a higher grip force, indicating superior impedance control of the left hand. Task difficulty had a weak effect on grip-load coupling during object movement and no effect on mean grip force during object stabilization. These results suggest that dynamic dominance extends to object manipulation, though the weak effect of task difficulty on grip characteristics warrants further investigation.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Naik, A., Ambike, S.. 2024-08-29. Handy divisions: Hand-specific specialization of prehensile control in bimanual tasks. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.610133

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Different hippocampal subfield volumes predict source memory performance and general cognitive ability in an adult lifespan sample

Modest positive associations between episodic memory performance and whole hippocampal and hippocampal subfield volumes have been reported in numerous prior studies. A smaller number of studies have reported associations between hippocampal volume and performance on tests of non-mnemonic cognition. The present study examined whether these associations were evident in a lifespan sample of cognitively healthy adults. Of particular interest was whether any identified associations were sensitive to age, and whether associations between subfield volumes and mnemonic and non-mnemonic performance were subfield dependent. We acquired high-resolution T1- and T2-weighted structural images from 163 adults (18-87 years of age). Participants also undertook a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and an in-scanner test of source memory. Principal components analysis was employed to reduce the neuropsychological test scores to 5 cognitive components. Two components reflected memory performance while the other three reflected different aspects of non-mnemonic cognition. Hippocampal subfields (Cornu Ammonis (CA)1, CA2-3, dentate gyrus (DG) and subiculum) were segmented and measured with the Automated Segmentation of Hippocampus Subfields (ASHS) package. Source memory performance was selectively associated across participants with CA2-3 volume. By contrast, both mnemonic and non-mnemonic component scores derived from the test battery were associated exclusively with the volume of the DG. All associations were age-invariant. The findings indicate that different cognitive domains can be dissociated by virtue of their associations with different hippocampal subfields. Of importance, these associations appear to be life-long and hence are unlikely to reflect individual differences in age-related decline in structural integrity.

neuroscience↗

Cell type specific astrocytic feedback regulates excitation inhibition balance and cortical network dynamics

Astrocytes actively regulate synaptic transmission and neuronal excitability, yet their role in orchestrating macroscopic cortical network regimes and slow-wave oscillations remains an active area of reasearch. This study investigates how bidirectional neuron astrocyte interactions shape emergent population dynamics using a computational network model of excitatory and inhibitory neurons coupled to an astrocyte. The results identify astrocytic feedback topology, rather than astrocytic coupling strength alone, as a key determinant of emergent cortical network dynamics. By systematically dissecting pathway-specific connectivity, it has been shown that the neuronal population driving astrocytic activation and the neuronal population receiving gliotransmission jointly determine whether the network occupies asynchronous irregular (AI), synchronous irregular (SI), synchronous regular(SR), asynchronous regular(AR) or quiescent regimes.Directing gliotransmission selectively onto excitatory neurons consistently promotes population synchrony regardless of the population influencing astrocytic dynamics, whereas selective modulation of inhibitory interneurons induces network quiescence via strong suppression. Under dual-target gliotransmission, network synchrony is dictated by the population driving astrocytic dynamics: excitatory-only drive promotes synchrony, while combined or inhibitory-specific drive preserves asynchronous states. Furthermore, the model reveals that astrocytic signaling kinetics provide an additional temporal control mechanism that regulates the frequency and persistence of self sustained up states.

neuroscience↗

VCP inhibition prevents cone photoreceptor degeneration in the cpfl1 mouse model of achromatopsia

Achromatopsia (ACHM) is a rare autosomal recessive retinal disorder characterized by absent cone photoreceptor function from early life, leading to severe visual impairment. Mutations in genes involved in the cone phototransduction cascade frequently result in elevated cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels and activation of stress pathways, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response. Targeting common downstream mechanisms rather than individual mutations may provide a broadly applicable therapeutic strategy. Here, we investigated whether pharmacological inhibition of valosin-containing protein (VCP), a key regulator of ER and protein homeostasis, can prevent cone degeneration in the spontaneous cone photoreceptor function loss 1 (cpfl1) mouse model of ACHM. Organotypic culture of retinal explants from cpfl1 mice were treated with the selective VCP inhibitor ML240. Cone survival, cell death, opsin expression and localization were assessed by TUNEL assay, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative image analysis. ML240 treatment significantly increased cone density and improved cone opsin expression and trafficking to the outer segments (OSs) in cpfl1 explants compared to controls. Importantly, rhodopsin trafficking in rod photoreceptors was unaffected, indicating that VCP inhibition did not impair normal rod phototransduction. These findings demonstrate that VCP inhibition by ML240 effectively preserves cone photoreceptors and improves cone-specific functional markers in the cpfl1 model. Targeting VCP may represent a mutation-independent therapeutic strategy for preventing cone death in ACHM.

neuroscience↗