Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.08.21.608694

BioLP-bench: Measuring understanding of AI models of biological lab protocols

Ivanov, I.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Language models rapidly become more capable in many domains, including biology. Both AI developers and policy makers [1] [2] [3] are in need of benchmarks that evaluate their proficiency in conducting biological research. However, there are only a handful of such benchmarks[4, 5], and all of them have their limitations. This paper introduces the Biological Lab Protocol benchmark (BioLP-bench) that evaluates the ability of language models to find and correct mistakes in a diverse set of laboratory protocols commonly used in biological research. To evaluate understanding of the protocols by AI models, we introduced in these protocols numerous mistakes that would still allow them to function correctly. After that we introduced in each protocol a single mistake that would cause it to fail. We then presented these modified protocols to an LLM, prompting it to identify the mistake that would cause it to fail, and measured the accuracy of a model in identifying such mistakes across many test cases. Only OpenAI o1-preview scored similarly to the performance of human experts, while other language models demonstrated substantially worse performance, and in most cases couldnt correctly identify the mistake. Code and dataset are published at https://github.com/baceolus/BioLP-bench

Explore related subjects

bioinformaticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ivanov, I.. 2024-08-26. BioLP-bench: Measuring understanding of AI models of biological lab protocols. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.21.608694

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Senescence-associated KRAS upregulation in peripheral T cells links to premature coronary artery disease

Aims: Premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) lacks specific molecular drivers, and the role of immunosenescence is unclear. We investigated whether aging-related gene dysregulation in T cells contributes to PCAD. Methods: We combined bulk transcriptomics of PBMCs from 12 PCAD patients and 21 controls, single-cell RNA sequencing of PBMCs and human atherosclerotic plaques, weighted gene co-expression network analysis, gene perturbation network analysis, and molecular docking. Results: KRAS was identified as a hub gene intersecting PCAD-associated genes and aging-related genes. Single-cell analysis showed KRAS upregulation predominantly in effector CD8+ T cells, which exhibited the highest senescence scores that were further elevated in disease. Network perturbation of KRAS strongly impacted the cell killing pathway. KRAS-high effector CD8+ T cells were detected in coronary and carotid plaques, displaying enhanced cytotoxicity, exhaustion, and senescence features. Additionally, a candidate small molecule was computationally predicted to bind inactive KRAS. Conclusions: Elevated KRAS expression in senescent, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells is associated with PCAD, bridging immunosenescence and premature atherosclerosis. This finding provides a novel biomarker candidate and potential therapeutic entry point, awaiting further functional validation.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Targeted finetuning enables co-folding models to learn ligand-induced protein conformational states

Advances in protein structure prediction have enabled all-atom protein-ligand co-folding models that predict bound conformations directly from sequence and small-molecule structure. However, these models often fail to generalize to novel binding sites or alternative protein conformational states, limiting their utility for chemical biology and drug discovery. Here we show this limitation reflects training data bias rather than architectural constraints and can be overcome through targeted finetuning. Using ten previously unseen X-ray structures of Werner (WRN) helicase from a drug discovery program, we finetune Boltz-1 to learn both an allosteric binding site and a large conformational change locking the enzyme in an inactive state, while preserving accuracy on the ATP-bound state. The finetuned model generalizes to different chemical series and transfers the conformational logic across RecQ-family helicases in a binding-site sequence-dependent manner. This approach provides a blueprint for adapting foundation models as new structural and mechanistic data emerge, enabling co-folding networks to capture ligand-induced conformational switches and binding poses absent from their training data but central to biological regulation and therapeutic intervention.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Benchmarking single-cell foundation models for aging biology

Single cell foundation models (scFMs) provide representations of cellular states, but their utility across biological questions in aging research remains unclear. We established a benchmark of cellular representations for aging research, evaluating ten general-purpose scFMs, three aging-specific models and conventional methods across five biological questions using more than 2.5 million single cell transcriptomes. Using frozen pretrained representations, Geneformer performed best among scFMs for chronological age prediction and age pseudotime concordance, although 2,000 highly variable genes achieved higher mean performance. Several scFMs captured positive molecular age shifts across three disease contexts, consistent with reported aging-associated changes. SCimilarity performed well for rare cellular state identification across out-of-distribution datasets, exceeding aging specific models and conventional baselines. At the gene level, scGPT showed the highest recovery of reference TF target interactions, including aging-related regulatory hubs. Overall, scFMs supported diverse aging analyses, but performance depended on the biological question, highlighting their utility for rare cellular state identification and regulatory analysis.

bioinformatics↗