Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.07.01.601523

Deep genetic substructure within bonobos

Abstract

Establishing the genetic and geographic structure of populations is fundamental both to understand their evolutionary past and preserve their future, especially for endangered species. Nevertheless, the patterns of genetic population structure are unknown for most endangered species, including some of our closest living relatives. This is the case of bonobos (Pan paniscus) which together with chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) are humans closest living relatives. Chimpanzees live across equatorial Africa and are classified into four subspecies (Groves, 2001), with some genetic population substructure even within subspecies. Conversely, bonobos live exclusively in the Democratic Republic of Congo and are considered a homogeneous group with low genetic diversity (Fischer et al. 2011) despite some population structure inferred from mtDNA. Nevertheless, mtDNA aside, their genetic structure remains unknown, hampering our understanding of the species and conservation efforts. Placing bonobos genetics in space is however challenging because, being endangered, only non-invasive sampling is possible for wild individuals. Here, we jointly analyse the exomes and mtDNA from 20 wild-born bonobos, the whole-genomes of 10 captive bonobos and the mtDNA of 61 wild individuals. We identify three genetically distinct bonobo groups of inferred Central, Western and Far-Western geographic origin within the bonobo range. We estimate the split time between the central and western populations to [~]145,000 years ago, and genetic differentiation to be in the order of that of the closest chimpanzee subspecies. We identify putative signatures of differential genetic adaptation among populations for genes associated with homeostasis, metabolism and the nervous system. Furthermore, our estimated long-term Ne for Far-West ([~]3,000) is among the lowest estimated for any great ape lineage. Our results highlight the need of attention to bonobo substructure, both in terms of research and conservation. Highlights- We identified three genetically distinct populations of bonobos, inferred as having Central, Western and Far-Western geographic origin within the species range. The estimated split time is [~]145,000 years ago for the Central and Western populations, and [~]60,000 years ago for the two Western populations. - The genetic differentiation between the Central and Far-Western bonobo populations is in the order of that between Central and Eastern chimpanzee subspecies, while the genetic differentiation among Western bonobo populations is similar to that among human groups. - Once substructure is accounted for, we infer a long-term effective population size (Ne) of only [~]3,000 for Far-Western bonobos, genetic isolation and inbreeding.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Han, S., de Filippo, C., Parra, G., Meneu, J. R., Laurent, R., Frandsen, P., Hvilsom, C., Gronau, I., Marques-Bonet, T., Kuhlwilm, M., Andres, A. M.. 2024-07-01. Deep genetic substructure within bonobos. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.01.601523

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗

TaxaAudit: A statistical model of consensus in phylogenetics identifies non-monophyletic taxa

Interpreting variation in genes and traits across species requires understanding their evolutionary relationships. Taxonomic hierarchies provide a practical approximation of the tree of life, with the NCBI taxonomy linking this framework directly to public sequence data. Some named groups, however, are not evolutionary clades, and recognizing these exceptions requires knowledge scattered across the phylogenetics literature. Here we introduce TaxaAudit, a statistical model that identifies taxonomic groups whose monophyly is repeatedly contradicted by published phylogenies. The model accounts for background taxonomic conflict and the ability of each study's species sampling to expose non-monophyly. Applied to 5,865 molecular phylogenies from TimeTree, TaxaAudit flagged 516 NCBI taxa at family rank and below for significant recurrent contradiction of monophyly. Excluding these taxa's monophyly requirements improved the taxonomy's agreement with independent phylogenomic reference trees and phylogenies withheld from discovery. Flagged taxa were also 3.61 times as likely as matched controls to have their monophyly challenged in publications outside the discovery set. In tree-inference experiments, excluding these monophyly constraints improved agreement with reference phylogenies relative to enforcing the unmodified taxonomy. By identifying groups whose monophyly should not be assumed, TaxaAudit lets researchers draw on published phylogenetic knowledge without reviewing the specialist literature for every taxon. This supports broader use of the NCBI taxonomy as an evolutionary framework for biological comparisons.

evolutionary biology↗

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗