Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.06.28.601224

Informing grassland ecosystem modeling with in-situ and remote sensing observations

Abstract

Historical grassland aboveground plant productivity (ANPP) was simulated by the DayCent-UV ecosystem model across the midwestern and western conterminous United States. For this study we developed a novel method for informing the DayCent-UV model and validating its plant productivity estimates for grasslands of the midwestern and western conterminous USA by utilizing a wide range of data sources at multiple scales, from field observations to remotely sensed satellite data. The model phenology was informed by the MODIS MCD12Q2 product, which showed good agreement with in-situ observations of growing season commencement and duration across different grassland ecosystems, and with observed historical trends. Model results from each simulated grid cell were compared to a remote-sensing ANPP modified version offered by the Analysis Rangeland Platform (RAP). This modified RAP ANPP calculation incorporated total annual precipitation, instead of mean annual temperature, as the control factor for the fraction of carbon allocated to roots. Strong temporal correlations were obtained between RAP and DayCent-UV, especially across the Great Plains. Good agreement was also found when the model results were compared with ANPP observations at the site and county level. The data produced by this study will serve as a valuable resource for validation or calibration of various models that aim to capture accurate productivity dynamics across diverse grassland ecosystems. Plain Language SummaryThis research used a computer model called DayCent-UV to simulate daily grassland growth across the central and western regions of the contiguous United States. To improve the agreement between the simulations and real-world conditions, we incorporated data from local field measurements and satellite imagery. This data helped determine the start and end dates of the growing season at each location. The simulated annual growth showed good agreement with satellite estimates from the Rangeland Analysis Platform (RAP), another computer application that monitors rangeland vegetation, and with local observations based on harvesting and weighing vegetation, particularly across the Great Plains. These results are valuable for validating and refining other computer models that aim to accurately simulate plant growth in grassland ecosystems; the predictions of these models are crucial for understanding the balance of carbon between plants, soils, and the atmosphere as the climate changes. Key PointsO_LIThe DayCent-UV model was used to simulate historical aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) for different grassland ecosystems across the midwestern and western United States. C_LIO_LIMODIS MCD12Q2 was used to provide the phenology for the model. C_LIO_LIThe Rangeland Analysis Platform (RAP) fraction of biomass production allocated to roots calculation was modified, resulting in a stronger agreement between its ANPP estimates and those from the DayCent-UV model. C_LIO_LISite- and county-level ANPP observations were used to validate the model. C_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arteaga, J., Hartman, M., Parton, W., Chen, M., Gao, W.. 2024-07-02. Informing grassland ecosystem modeling with in-situ and remote sensing observations. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.28.601224

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Beyond Single-Metric Assessments: Uncovering Masked Butterfly Declines via Multi-Scalar Analysis in Central Alberta

1. This study analyzed 21 years (2000-2025) of butterfly count data from Central Alberta, integrated with intensive 5-year (2021-2025) high-resolution intra-seasonal sampling. 2. Long-term macro-scale analysis revealed a significant decline in Shannon Diversity, a change that remained obscured when relying solely on traditional metrics of species richness and evenness. 3. This diversity decline was primarily driven by the severe, long-term collapse of the native Common Ringlet (Coenonympha tullia). 4. Four other dominant species--Cabbage White (Pieris rapae), Clouded Sulphur (Colias eriphyle), European Skipper (Thymelicus lineola), and Common Wood Nymph (Cercyonis pegala)--maintained long-term population stability, though their abundances were significantly constrained by extreme winter minimum temperatures and rapid spring warming. 5. High-resolution intra-seasonal analysis (2021-2025) demonstrated that community indices and species-specific abundances were strongly limited by daily weather, particularly wind velocity and temperature. 6. These findings illustrate that while traditional metrics like richness and evenness are fundamental to community ecology, they provide incomplete insights when applied in isolation; they are most effective when utilized as part of a complementary, multi-scalar framework. 7. This study highlights the necessity of coupling multi-decadal historical datasets with high-frequency, fine-scale sampling to accurately identify the mechanisms of community turnover that simpler metrics may overlook. 8. The results underscore the critical importance of standardized citizen science monitoring in quantifying environmental impacts and establishing conservation priorities for terrestrial insect groups.

ecology↗

From concentration to export: resource contrasts and bee traits shape pollinator spillover to crops

Floral plantings can either concentrate bees or export them to adjacent crops, yet the ecological conditions influencing these outcomes remain unclear. Here, we develop a mathematical model as proof of concept for our previous integrative hypothesis: concentrator and exporter outcomes can arise as alternative, context-dependent outcomes of the same underlying resource-selection process. Using bees as a model and focusing specifically on spillover from floral plantings to crops, we identified resource-specific thresholds separating concentration- and export-favoring conditions. Our model translates differences in relative patch attractiveness into context-dependent concentration and export outcomes and generates resource-specific, testable predictions about the conditions favoring pollinator movement into crops. In our simulations, the concentrator-exporter transition occurred at a lower flowering-intensity contrast than at pollen or nectar contrasts, which suggests that flowering intensity may provide an initial cue for bee movement, whereas nectar and pollen rewards refine or sustain bee responses once crops are perceived as attractive. Spillover thresholds differed among resource contrasts, whereas response steepness varied across bee-trait and community scenarios. Under the model's trait-sensitivity formulation, predicted spillover probability responded more strongly to flowering contrast for specialists than for generalists; colony size amplified this response, whereas bee richness dampened it. Together, these patterns show how flowering and resource contrasts interact with bee traits and community context to shape predicted spillover. Our results confirm that the concentrator and exporter hypotheses can be understood as context-dependent outcomes of the same ecological process rather than as mutually exclusive alternatives. Experimental tests of the predicted thresholds conducted in the field could reveal when and where floral plantings are most likely to promote bee spillover to crops, potentially supporting crop pollination.

ecology↗

A Computational Re-evaluation of Spatial Trials for Zoonotic Tuberculosis Control: Model Misspecification, Diagnostic Miss-classification, and the Illusion of Wildlife Culling Efficacy

1. Wildlife reservoir management frequently relies on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial's (RBCT) trade-off hypothesis, which posits that reductions in cattle herd infections are offset by a perturbation effect driven by disrupted host dispersal. This paper evaluates the computational and epidemiological robustness of this historical trial, which serves as the foundational empirical experiment guiding zoonotic tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) control policies. 2. Using generalized linear mixed models with a generalized Poisson error distribution to explicitly address historical data overdispersion, this study contrasts traditional parametric inference against exact cluster-constrained permutation tests across distinct operational definitions of disease incidence. 3. Non-parametric diagnostics reveal that previously reported treatment and perturbation effects render as statistical artifacts under exact non-parametric permutation. Inside culling zones, parametric significance fails to withstand exact permutation verification due to extreme data leverage in localized cluster blocks. 4. Crucially, when diagnostic misclassification biases are eliminated by analysing total reactor datasets, all apparent culling effects disappear, and information criteria overwhelmingly favour nested null architectures. Unconfirmed reactors likely represent true biological infections missed by low-sensitivity post-mortem macro-necropsy, proving that host removal tracks observation noise rather than genuine zoonotic transmission pathways. 5. Finally, empirical scaling conducted in this study identifies a novel mathematical saturation effect, demonstrating that this sub-linear scaling is an operational artifact of unmodelled herd-level disease recurrence over time. 6. Policy implications. Because current zoonotic tuberculosis intervention frameworks are built upon a structurally misspecified statistical model, they have driven large-scale veterinary policies resulting in substantial, unevidenced ecological and economic interventions while failing to provide genuine public health, animal health, or disease control benefits.

ecology↗