Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.06.27.600703

Same trait, different genes: pelvic spine loss in three brook stickleback populations in Alberta

Abstract

The genetic basis of phenotypic or adaptive parallelism can reveal much about constraints on evolution. This study investigated the genetic basis of a canonically parallel trait: pelvic spine reduction in sticklebacks. Pelvic reduction has a highly parallel genetic basis in threespine stickleback in populations around the world, always involving a deletion of the pel1 enhancer of Pitx1. We conducted a genome-wide association study to investigate the genetic basis of pelvic spine reduction in three populations of brook stickleback in Alberta, Canada. Pelvic reduction did not involve Pitx1 in any of the three populations. Instead, pelvic reduction in one population involved a mutation in an exon of Tbx4, and it involved a mutation in an intron of Lmbr1 in the other two populations. Hence, the parallel phenotypic evolution of pelvic spine reduction across stickleback genera, and among brook stickleback populations, has a non-parallel genetic basis. This suggests that there may be redundancy in the genetic basis of this adaptive polymorphism, but it is not clear whether a lack of parallelism indicates a lack of constraint on the evolution of this adaptive trait. Whether the different pleiotropic effects of different mutations have different fitness consequences, or whether certain pelvic reduction mutations confer specific benefits in certain environments, remains to be determined. Lay SummaryIn this study, we looked for the genetic basis of a well-studied trait in stickleback fish: the pelvic spines. This structure (i.e. the pelvic girdle and attached spines) has a shared developmental basis (and is homologous to) the pelvic bones and hind limbs of all tetrapods (including humans). We know from studying mice, fish, humans, and even manatees that there are several genes that could affect the development of pelvic spines and hind limbs. In one species of stickleback, the threespine stickleback, however, a single gene called Pitx1 is always involved in the loss of pelvic spines in populations that have adapted to freshwater lakes. This replicated evolution of the same trait in the same environmental conditions is called parallel evolution. Its remarkable that Pitx1 is always the gene underlying this adaptive loss of spines in freshwater threespine stickleback populations. We were interested in whether this "genetic parallelism" extended to other species of stickleback that have also evolved the loss of pelvic spines. We looked at three populations of brook stickleback (which are never found in the ocean), each of which contains individuals with and without pelvic spines. We found that the Pitx1 genetic parallelism does not extend to brook stickleback, and, in fact, the genetic basis of pelvic spine loss differs between populations. In Muir Lake and Astotoin Lake, pelvic spine loss results from a mutation in the Lmbr1 gene, and in Shunda Lake, pelvic spine loss results from a mutation in the Tbx4 gene.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mee, J. A.. 2024-06-29. Same trait, different genes: pelvic spine loss in three brook stickleback populations in Alberta. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.27.600703

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Geometry of antigenic evolution improves influenza vaccine selection

Anticipating antigenic evolution is essential for selecting effective seasonal influenza A/H3N2 vaccine strains. To this end, we integrated hemagglutination-inhibition and neutralization titers spanning 2002 to 2025 into a unified Bayesian antigenic map. The map resolves twelve antigenic clusters advancing in discrete steps, with several clusters co-circulating in most seasons. In 15 of 21 seasons, the WHO-recommended vaccine belonged to an earlier cluster than the dominant circulating cluster. The direction of each vaccine update relative to recent viral drift predicted vaccine effectiveness one season ahead in out-of-sample forecasts. Antigenic distance, the conventional measure of vaccine-virus match, was weakly associated with effectiveness until update direction was accounted for. Retrospectively ranking candidate strains by predicted effectiveness would have selected a strain predicted to outperform the WHO recommendation in every season, raising mean predicted effectiveness by 10 percentage points.

evolutionary biology↗

Evolutionary replay of duplicate-gene retention across independent whole-genome duplications

Whole-genome duplications repeatedly expose ancestral gene lineages to the same broad evolutionary outcome-retention or loss of duplicated copies-but it remains unclear whether this history replays similarly across evolutionary scales. We placed duplicate retention in shared hierarchical orthologous-group coordinates and compared percentile ranks defined within each event-wide mapped universe. Three independent angiosperm whole-genome duplications showed reproducible replay (global rank effect T-replay = 0.210, bootstrap 95% confidence interval 0.172-0.248; permutation P = 1/100,001). A plant reference-panel score specified before target outcomes were examined predicted retention after the Apple/Pear duplication ({rho} = 0.169, n = 373). Deep transfer was heterogeneous: the teleost-genome-duplication estimate was positive but unresolved ({rho} = 0.107, n = 151, 95% confidence interval -0.050 to 0.260), whereas transfer to the ancient budding-yeast whole-genome duplication (yeast WGD) was supported ({rho} = 0.280, n = 186). Independently reconstructed animal outcomes also replayed between teleost and Stylommatophora duplications (r = 0.226, n = 146, P = 0.00326), although the effect remained below a prespecified strong-effect threshold. A strict plant-animal comparison was limited to 25 deeply one-to-one lineages and was unresolved (r = 0.033, 95% confidence interval -0.303 to 0.340). Thus, ancestral gene-lineage identity contributes reproducibly to duplicate retention after independent whole-genome duplications, but replay is structured by evolutionary lineage and modified by event-specific history rather than governed by one universal gene-fate ranking.

evolutionary biology↗

A Hymenoptera-restricted gene mediating ant castes co-opts deeply conserved machinery to control organ size

Lineage-specific genes are widespread and have been implicated as phenotypic innovation inducers, but how they acquire complex developmental functions remains poorly understood. Ant queens and workers develop dramatically different organ sizes from identical genomes under juvenile hormone (JH) control, yet the molecular effectors translating JH signalling into caste-specific organ growth remain unknown. Here we identify torch, a Hymenoptera-restricted gene, as the most consistently gyne-biased and JH-responsive gene across 68 ant species. Knockdown of torch in virgin queens of Monomorium pharaonis produces a worker-like, multi-organ growth-restricted phenotype. Mechanistically, torch harbours an E-box-like motif activated by the JH receptor Gce-Tai and acts as a GA-repeat-binding transcription factor that regulates Hippo signalling, the deeply conserved organ-size control pathway in animals. Expressing torch heterologously in mice and a growth-restricted Drosophila background shows that the gene retained its general growth-promoting activity across more than 700 million years of animal evolution in lineages that lack the gene, establishing that its function is mediated through conserved rather than ant-specific machinery. A lineage-specific gene can therefore acquire complex morphogenetic function by co-opting ancient organ-size circuitry, providing a general route by which novel genes can drive phenotypic innovation.

evolutionary biology↗